These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Designer genes: an ethical perspective on genetic manipulation. Dreeman CJ Rutgers Comput Technol Law J; 1989; 15(2):447-74. PubMed ID: 16100798 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Herd behavior in designer genes. Huang PH Wake Forest Law Rev; 1999; 34(3):639-69. PubMed ID: 12664907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Medical ethics and reproductive genetics in Swedish public discourse. Dekker C Biomed Ethics; 2000; 5(3):100-5. PubMed ID: 12755111 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Genetic enhancement, distributive justice, and the goals of medicine. Hall MA San Diego Law Rev; 2002; 39(3):669-81. PubMed ID: 15508227 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Procreative reasons-relevance: on the moral significance of why we have children. Lotz M Bioethics; 2009 Jun; 23(5):291-9. PubMed ID: 18445093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Equality and the treatment-enhancement distinction. Holtug N Bioethics; 2011 Mar; 25(3):137-44. PubMed ID: 19659850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Why genetic testing for genes for criminality is morally required. Savulescu J Princet J Bioeth; 2001; 4():79-97. PubMed ID: 12166468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The case against perfection: what's wrong with designer children, bionic athletes, and genetic engineering. Sandel MJ Atl Mon; 2004 Apr; 292(3):50-4, 56-60, 62. PubMed ID: 15468473 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Medical study: aspiring parents, genotypes and phenotypes: the unexamined myth of the perfect baby. Banger E; McGee G Albany Law Rev; 2005; 68(4):1097-111. PubMed ID: 16094768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Should we design our descendants? Chapman AR J Soc Christ Ethics; 2003; 23(2):199-223. PubMed ID: 16175718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The search for perfection. Harris J; Shakespeare T; Phillips K; Bruce D New Sci; 2002 May; 174(2342):52-4. PubMed ID: 12408144 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Human enhancement and sexual dimorphism. Sparrow R Bioethics; 2012 Nov; 26(9):464-75. PubMed ID: 21518376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The moral choice: prospective mothers should have the right to select embryos on the basis of knowing as much as possible about their future health. Harris J New Sci; 2006 Jun 17-23; 190(2556):24. PubMed ID: 16862722 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A not-so-new eugenics. Harris and Savulescu on human enhancement. Sparrow R Hastings Cent Rep; 2011; 41(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 21329104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does bioethics provide answers?: Secular and religious bioethics and our procreative future. Smolin DM Cumberland Law Rev; 2004-2005; 35(3):473-517. PubMed ID: 16715560 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Reprogenetics and the "parents have always done it" argument. Malmqvist E Hastings Cent Rep; 2011; 41(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 21329105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]