191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15986547)
1. Some reflections on an international convention on the banning of human cloning and related patents.
Eugui DV; Spennemann C
J World Intellect Prop; 2003 May; 6(3):485-505. PubMed ID: 15986547
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Governing genetics: reifying choice and progress.
Kerr A
New Genet Soc; 2003 Aug; 22(2):143-58. PubMed ID: 15282910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patents on parts of the human body: salient issues under EC and WTO law.
Herdegen M
J World Intellect Prop; 2002 Mar; 5(2):145-55. PubMed ID: 15986546
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Science policy and the law: reproductive and therapeutic cloning.
Knowles LP
N Y Univ J Legis Public Policy; 2000-2001; 4(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 15011709
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The prodigal son: the relationship between patent law and health care.
Bostyn SJ
Med Law Rev; 2003; 11(1):67-120. PubMed ID: 14606473
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Regulation as facilitation: negotiating the genetic revolution.
Black J
Mod Law Rev; 1998 Sep; 61(5):621-60. PubMed ID: 14518446
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Harmonizing the international regulation of embryonic stem cell research: possibilities, promises and potential pitfalls.
Campbell A; Nycum G
Med Law Int; 2005; 7(2):113-48. PubMed ID: 16622976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. U.S. panel about to weigh in on rules for assisted fertility.
Hall SS
N Y Times Web; 2004 Mar; ():F1, F4. PubMed ID: 15250081
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The attack of the clones: patent law and stem cell research.
Rimmer M
J Law Med; 2003 May; 10(4):488-505. PubMed ID: 12852321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stem cell technologies: regulation, patents and problems.
Then SN
J Law Med; 2004 Nov; 12(2):188-204. PubMed ID: 15575321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Human Cloning Prohibition Act: did Congress go too far?
Cannon J; Haas M
Harvard J Legis; 1998; 35(2):637-45. PubMed ID: 11660809
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Patenting and ethics--a dubious connection.
Crespi RS
J Pat Trademark Off Soc; 2003 Jan; 85(1):31-47. PubMed ID: 15212036
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Washington Insider: Congressional impasse on human cloning.
Doerflinger RM
Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2004; 4(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 15192847
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Arbitrage, bioethics, and cloning: the ABCs of gestating a United Nations Cloning Convention.
Isasi RM; Annas GJ
Case West Reserve J Int Law; 2003; 35(3):397-414. PubMed ID: 16184672
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Patents. Company gets rights to cloned human embryos.
Vogel G
Science; 2000 Jan; 287(5453):559. PubMed ID: 10691527
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A triumph of hope.
New Sci; 1997 May; 154(2084):3. PubMed ID: 11656657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Creating a clone in ninety days: in search of a cloning policy.
Bonnicksen AL
Politics Life Sci; 1997 Sep; 16(2):304-8. PubMed ID: 11902213
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Human cloning.
Nader C; Newman SA
Science; 1998 Dec; 282(5395):1824-5. PubMed ID: 9874632
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Challenges to human embryonic stem cell patents.
Plomer A; Taymor KS; Scott CT
Cell Stem Cell; 2008 Jan; 2(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 18371416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. From human genes to stem cells: new challenges for patent law?
Caulfield TA
Trends Biotechnol; 2003 Mar; 21(3):101-3. PubMed ID: 12628363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
