168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15986548)
1. Patents and human genome research in developing countries: problems and proposals.
Thambisetty S
J World Intellect Prop; 2002 Sep; 5(5):685-723. PubMed ID: 15986548
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The inscription of life in law: genes, patents, and bio-politics.
Pottage A
Mod Law Rev; 1998 Sep; 61(5):740-65. PubMed ID: 14518448
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Consent, commodification and benefit-sharing in genetic research.
Dickenson D
Dev World Bioeth; 2004 Dec; 4(2):109-24. PubMed ID: 15516211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bioprospecting, genetic patenting and indigenous populations: challenges under a restructured information commons.
Faye DJ
J World Intellect Prop; 2004 May; 7(3):401-28. PubMed ID: 16755699
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Surpassing the material: the human rights implications of informed consent in bioprospecting cells derived from indigenous people groups.
Wu AO
Wash Univ Law Q; 2000; 78(3):979-1003. PubMed ID: 16273699
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Are DNA patents bad for medicine?
Resnik DB
Health Policy; 2003 Aug; 65(2):181-97. PubMed ID: 12849916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Genetics, commodification, and social justice in the globalization era.
Cahill LS
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2001 Sep; 11(3):221-38. PubMed ID: 11700680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The two meanings of how and the gene patenting debate.
Evans JH
Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(3):26-8. PubMed ID: 12230851
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Governing population genomics: law, bioethics, and biopolitics in three case studies.
Winickoff DE
Jurimetrics; 2003; 43(2):187-228. PubMed ID: 15156881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Gene patents: the need for bioethics scrutiny and legal change.
Andrews LB; Paradise J
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2005; 5(1):403-12. PubMed ID: 15742584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The ethics of the economics of patenting the human genome.
Martone M
J Bus Ethics; 1998 Nov; 17(15):1679-84. PubMed ID: 11660691
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The Human Genome Diversity Project: ethical problems and solutions.
Resnik DB
Politics Life Sci; 1999 Mar; 18(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 11660815
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The Harvard case of Xu Xiping: exploitation of the people, scientific advance, or genetic theft?
Sleeboom M
New Genet Soc; 2005 Apr; 24(1):57-78. PubMed ID: 16552917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Lockean argument against gene patenting.
Murray D
Bus Prof Ethics J; 2001; 20(3-4):129-43. PubMed ID: 15195649
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Property rights in genetic information.
Spinello RA
Ethics Inf Technol; 2004; 6(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 16969959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How should the benefits of bioprospecting be shared?
Millum J
Hastings Cent Rep; 2010; 40(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 20169653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Proprietary rights in body parts: the relevance of Moore's case in Australia.
Mortimer D
Monash Univ Law Rev; 1993; 19(1):217-25. PubMed ID: 17333577
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Toward global justice through benefit-sharing.
Chennells R
Hastings Cent Rep; 2010; 40(1):3. PubMed ID: 20166507
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. India fears patent and ethics abuses.
Schüklenk U
Nat Biotechnol; 1997 Jul; 15(7):613. PubMed ID: 11644986
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. DNA as taxable property - the elephant in the room or a red herring?
Hunter KG
Eur J Health Law; 2006 Sep; 13(3):263-75. PubMed ID: 17190351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
