These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15986946)

  • 1. Two-year clinical performance of occlusal and cervical giomer restorations.
    Sunico MC; Shinkai K; Katoh Y
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(3):282-9. PubMed ID: 15986946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Class II composite restorations with metallic and translucent matrices: 2-year follow-up findings.
    Demarco FF; Cenci MS; Lima FG; Donassollo TA; André Dde A; Leida FL
    J Dent; 2007 Mar; 35(3):231-7. PubMed ID: 17034926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A prospective randomised clinical trial of one bis-GMA-based and two ormocer-based composite restorative systems in class II cavities: three-year results.
    Bottenberg P; Alaerts M; Keulemans F
    J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):163-71. PubMed ID: 16963171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. One-year comparison of metallic and translucent matrices in Class II composite resin restorations.
    Cenci MS; Demarco FF; Pereira CL; Lund RG; de Carvalho RM
    Am J Dent; 2007 Feb; 20(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 17380807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Five-year clinical performance of two fluoride-releasing giomer resin materials in occlusal restorations.
    Ozer F; Patel R; Yip J; Yakymiv O; Saleh N; Blatz MB
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Dec; 34(8):1213-1220. PubMed ID: 35934807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 17-year findings.
    da Rosa Rodolpho PA; Cenci MS; Donassollo TA; Loguércio AD; Demarco FF
    J Dent; 2006 Aug; 34(7):427-35. PubMed ID: 16314023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Two-centre evaluation of a resin composite/ self-etching restorative system: three-year findings.
    Wilson NH; Gordan VV; Brunton PA; Wilson MA; Crisp RJ; Mjör IA
    J Adhes Dent; 2006 Feb; 8(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 16536345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. One-year clinical evaluation of two resin composites, two polymerization methods, and a resin-modified glass ionomer in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Koubi S; Raskin A; Bukiet F; Pignoly C; Toca E; Tassery H
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):42-53. PubMed ID: 17091139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Five-year clinical evaluation of One-Up Bond F in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Burrow MF; Tyas MJ
    Am J Dent; 2007 Dec; 20(6):361-4. PubMed ID: 18269125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance and wear of a nanocomposite versus a hybrid composite.
    Palaniappan S; Bharadwaj D; Mattar DL; Peumans M; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P
    Dent Mater; 2009 Nov; 25(11):1302-14. PubMed ID: 19577288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of layering techniques on the micro-tensile bond strength to dentin in resin composite restorations.
    Niu Y; Ma X; Fan M; Zhu S
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):129-34. PubMed ID: 18614225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical evaluation of a self-etch adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Abdalla AI; El Sayed HY
    Am J Dent; 2008 Oct; 21(5):327-30. PubMed ID: 19024260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Restorative treatment of cervical lesions with resin composites: 4-year results.
    Belluz M; Pedrocca M; Gagliani M
    Am J Dent; 2005 Dec; 18(6):307-10. PubMed ID: 16433396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite in class V carious lesions: 3-year results.
    Demirci M; Ersev H; Topçubaşi M; Uçok M
    Dent Mater J; 2005 Sep; 24(3):321-7. PubMed ID: 16279721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical performance of posterior compomer restorations over 4 years.
    Krämer N; García-Godoy F; Reinelt C; Frankenberger R
    Am J Dent; 2006 Feb; 19(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 16555660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. One year clinical evaluation of two different types of composite resins in posterior teeth.
    Gianordoli Neto R; Santiago SL; Mendonça JS; Passos VF; Lauris JR; Navarro MF
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 May; 9(4):26-33. PubMed ID: 18473024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nine-year evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite open sandwich technique in Class II cavities.
    Lindberg A; van Dijken JW; Lindberg M
    J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 16956709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical evaluation of self-etch adhesives in Class V non-carious lesions.
    Abdalla AI; García-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 2006 Oct; 19(5):289-92. PubMed ID: 17073206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A prospective randomized clinical trial of one bis-GMA-based and two ormocer-based composite restorative systems in class II cavities: Five-year results.
    Bottenberg P; Jacquet W; Alaerts M; Keulemans F
    J Dent; 2009 Mar; 37(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 19131153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A clinical evaluation of a resin composite and a compomer in non-carious Class V lesions. A 3-year follow-up.
    Pollington S; van Noort R
    Am J Dent; 2008 Feb; 21(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 18435377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.