218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15987335)
1. The use of life expectancy in cancer screening guidelines. Moving with caution from model-based evidence to evidence-based guidelines.
Lantz PM; Ubel PA
J Gen Intern Med; 2005 Jun; 20(6):552-3. PubMed ID: 15987335
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comments and response on the USPSTF recommendation on screening for breast cancer.
Begg CB
Ann Intern Med; 2010 Apr; 152(8):540-1; author reply 543-4. PubMed ID: 20157101
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Cost-effectiveness analysis of breast cancer screening with mammography].
Iinuma T
Nihon Rinsho; 2007 Jun; 65 Suppl 6():226-8. PubMed ID: 17682158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Breast cancer screening methods: a review of the evidence.
Vahabi M
Health Care Women Int; 2003 Nov; 24(9):773-93. PubMed ID: 14742116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Screening for breast cancer after the age of 70: effect on breast cancer mortality].
van Dijck JA; Verbeek AL; Hendriks JH; Holland R
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1995 Mar; 139(9):428-33. PubMed ID: 7891764
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comments and response on the USPSTF recommendation on screening for breast cancer.
Braithwaite RS
Ann Intern Med; 2010 Apr; 152(8):539-40; author reply 543-4. PubMed ID: 20157104
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of costs and benefits of breast cancer screening with mammography, ultrasonography, and MRI.
Feig S
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2011 Mar; 38(1):179-96, ix. PubMed ID: 21419333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening mammography in women 40 to 49 years of age.
Lisby MD
Am Fam Physician; 2004 Nov; 70(9):1750-2. PubMed ID: 15554494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact of alternative practices on the cost and quality of mammographic screening in the United States.
Burnside E; Belkora J; Esserman L
Clin Breast Cancer; 2001 Jul; 2(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 11899786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast cancer screening: from science to recommendation.
Petitti DB; Calonge N; LeFevre ML; Melnyk BM; Wilt TJ; Schwartz JS;
Radiology; 2010 Jul; 256(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 20574080
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. United States Preventive Services Task Force screening mammography recommendations: science ignored.
Hendrick RE; Helvie MA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Feb; 196(2):W112-6. PubMed ID: 21257850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Screening for breast cancer in India--is it an appropriate strategy?
Moss S
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Sep; 100(18):1270-1. PubMed ID: 18780862
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Revolution follows the breast cancer epidemic.
Evans N
Revolution; 1996; 6(2):30-1. PubMed ID: 9043377
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Mammoscam.
Randal J
N C Med J; 1993 May; 54(5):194-5; discussion 196-9. PubMed ID: 8510774
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The muddle over screening breast Ca.
Thomas P
Med World News; 1988 May; 29(9):34-6, 42, 47-8. PubMed ID: 10312486
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Screening for cancer: when to stop?: A practical guide and review of the evidence.
Soung MC
Med Clin North Am; 2015 Mar; 99(2):249-62. PubMed ID: 25700582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The breast carcinoma screening interval is important.
Michaelson JS; Kopans DB; Cady B
Cancer; 2000 Mar; 88(6):1282-4. PubMed ID: 10717607
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical inquiries. When should we stop mammography screening for breast cancer in elderly women?
Parnes BL; Smith PC; Conry CM; Domke H
J Fam Pract; 2001 Feb; 50(2):110-1. PubMed ID: 11219555
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-effectiveness of mammography for older women.
Finucane TE
Ann Intern Med; 2004 May; 140(10):844; author reply 844. PubMed ID: 15148077
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. New guidelines, research add to mammography controversy.
Levenson D
Rep Med Guidel Outcomes Res; 2002 Sep; 13(18):1-2, 5. PubMed ID: 12577912
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
