181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15987970)
1. Cartilage MR imaging at 3.0 versus that at 1.5 T: preliminary results in a porcine model.
Masi JN; Sell CA; Phan C; Han E; Newitt D; Steinbach L; Majumdar S; Link TM
Radiology; 2005 Jul; 236(1):140-50. PubMed ID: 15987970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Volumetric cartilage measurements of porcine knee at 1.5-T and 3.0-T MR imaging: evaluation of precision and accuracy.
Bauer JS; Krause SJ; Ross CJ; Krug R; Carballido-Gamio J; Ozhinsky E; Majumdar S; Link TM
Radiology; 2006 Nov; 241(2):399-406. PubMed ID: 17057067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Isotropic 3-dimensional fast spin echo imaging versus standard 2-dimensional imaging at 3.0 T of the knee: artificial cartilage and meniscal lesions in a porcine model.
Ristow O; Stehling C; Krug R; Steinbach L; Sabo G; Ambekar A; Huber M; Link TM
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010; 34(2):260-9. PubMed ID: 20351518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. MR imaging of articular cartilage at 1.5T and 3.0T: comparison of IDEAL 2D FSE and 3D SPGR with fat-saturated 2D FSE and 3D SPGR in a porcine model.
Cha JG; Yoo JH; Rhee SJ; Hwang SS; Han JK
Acta Radiol; 2014 May; 55(4):462-9. PubMed ID: 23943628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Synthetic-echo time postprocessing technique for generating images with variable T2-weighted contrast: diagnosis of meniscal and cartilage abnormalities of the knee.
Andreisek G; White LM; Theodoropoulos JS; Naraghi A; Young N; Zhao CY; Mamisch TC; Sussman MS
Radiology; 2010 Jan; 254(1):188-99. PubMed ID: 20032152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 3.0-T evaluation of knee cartilage by using three-dimensional IDEAL GRASS imaging: comparison with fast spin-echo imaging.
Kijowski R; Blankenbaker DG; Woods MA; Shinki K; De Smet AA; Reeder SB
Radiology; 2010 Apr; 255(1):117-27. PubMed ID: 20173102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Knee derangements: comparison of isotropic 3D fast spin-echo, isotropic 3D balanced fast field-echo, and conventional 2D fast spin-echo MR imaging.
Jung JY; Yoon YC; Kim HR; Choe BK; Wang JH; Jung JY
Radiology; 2013 Sep; 268(3):802-13. PubMed ID: 23533289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fat suppression gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging of experimental articular cartilage lesions: comparison between phase-contrast method at 0.23T and chemical shift selective method at 1.5T.
Palosaari K; Ojala R; Blanco-Sequeiros R; Tervonen O
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Aug; 18(2):225-31. PubMed ID: 12884336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison between pig lumbar zypapophyseal joint cartilage acquired from multiple magnetic resonance image sequences and gross specimens].
Liao H; Yu W; Wang W; Liao Y
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2010 Oct; 35(10):1064-72. PubMed ID: 21051831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of 1.5- and 3.0-T MR imaging for evaluating the articular cartilage of the knee joint.
Kijowski R; Blankenbaker DG; Davis KW; Shinki K; Kaplan LD; De Smet AA
Radiology; 2009 Mar; 250(3):839-48. PubMed ID: 19164121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical usefulness of adding 3D cartilage imaging sequences to a routine knee MR protocol.
Kijowski R; Blankenbaker DG; Woods M; Del Rio AM; De Smet AA; Reeder SB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jan; 196(1):159-67. PubMed ID: 21178062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Articular cartilage of the knee: rapid three-dimensional MR imaging at 3.0 T with IDEAL balanced steady-state free precession--initial experience.
Gold GE; Reeder SB; Yu H; Kornaat P; Shimakawa AS; Johnson JW; Pelc NJ; Beaulieu CF; Brittain JH
Radiology; 2006 Aug; 240(2):546-51. PubMed ID: 16801369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score assessed with an isotropic three-dimensional true fast imaging with steady-state precession sequence at 3.0 Tesla.
Welsch GH; Zak L; Mamisch TC; Resinger C; Marlovits S; Trattnig S
Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):603-12. PubMed ID: 19692843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fast high-spatial-resolution MRI of the ankle with parallel imaging using GRAPPA at 3 T.
Bauer JS; Banerjee S; Henning TD; Krug R; Majumdar S; Link TM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Jul; 189(1):240-5. PubMed ID: 17579177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of 3D vs. 2D fast spin echo imaging for evaluation of articular cartilage in the knee on a 3T system scientific research.
Milewski MD; Smitaman E; Moukaddam H; Katz LD; Essig DA; Medvecky MJ; Haims AH
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1637-43. PubMed ID: 21683539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Articular cartilage of the knee: evaluation with fluctuating equilibrium MR imaging--initial experience in healthy volunteers.
Gold GE; Hargreaves BA; Vasanawala SS; Webb JD; Shimakawa AS; Brittain JH; Beaulieu CF
Radiology; 2006 Feb; 238(2):712-8. PubMed ID: 16436826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MRI findings in injured articular cartilage of the knee correlated with surgical findings.
Li XM; Peng WJ; Wu H; Kacher D; Xia LM; Ai F; Li F; Xiong W
Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Nov; 122(21):2624-30. PubMed ID: 19951582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnosis of acetabular labral tears: comparison of three-dimensional intermediate-weighted fast spin-echo MR arthrography with two-dimensional MR arthrography at 3.0 T.
Park SY; Park JS; Jin W; Rhyu KH; Ryu KN
Acta Radiol; 2013 Feb; 54(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 23093725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MR imaging of cartilage in cadaveric wrists: comparison between imaging at 1.5 and 3.0 T and gross pathologic inspection.
Saupe N; Pfirrmann CW; Schmid MR; Schertler T; Manestar M; Weishaupt D
Radiology; 2007 Apr; 243(1):180-7. PubMed ID: 17312277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR imaging with fat saturation in detecting cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with arthroscopy in 130 patients.
Bredella MA; Tirman PF; Peterfy CG; Zarlingo M; Feller JF; Bost FW; Belzer JP; Wischer TK; Genant HK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Apr; 172(4):1073-80. PubMed ID: 10587150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
