These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15988815)
1. Prostate-specific antigen, digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography: a meta-analysis for this diagnostic triad of prostate cancer in symptomatic korean men. Song JM; Kim CB; Chung HC; Kane RL Yonsei Med J; 2005 Jun; 46(3):414-24. PubMed ID: 15988815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Comparison between 2 techniques of screening for prostatic carcinoma. Rectal exploration and transrectal ultrasonography vs. prostate specific antigen]. Ciatto S; Bonardi R; Mazzotta A; Lombardi C; Santoni R; Cardini S; Zappa M Radiol Med; 1994 Oct; 88(4):453-7. PubMed ID: 7527916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Relative contribution of digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography in interpreting serum prostate-specific antigen values for screening prostate cancer in Arab men. Sheikh M; Sinan T; Kehinde EO; Hussein AY; Anim JT; Al-Hunayan AA Ann Saudi Med; 2007; 27(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 17356323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) including digital rectal examination (DRE) of the prostate on the level of prostate specific antigen (PSA). Klomp ML; Hendrikx AJ; Keyzer JJ Br J Urol; 1994 Jan; 73(1):71-4. PubMed ID: 7507784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stratification of prostate-specific antigen level and results of transrectal ultrasonography and digital rectal examination as predictors of positive prostate biopsy. Clark TW; Goldenberg L; Cooperberg PL; Wong AD; Singer J Can Assoc Radiol J; 1997 Aug; 48(4):252-8. PubMed ID: 9282157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Experience with an assay for prostate-specific antigen and transrectal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Heman-Ackah CA; Festenstein JB; Hibbert P; Harvey DJ; Bunce CJ; Gelister JS Br J Urol; 1997 Mar; 79(3):439-44. PubMed ID: 9117228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic significance of digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography in men with prostate-specific antigen levels of 4 NG/ML or less. Yamamoto T; Ito K; Ohi M; Kubota Y; Suzuki K; Fukabori Y; Kurokawa K; Yamanaka H Urology; 2001 Dec; 58(6):994-8. PubMed ID: 11744475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The value of screening tests in the detection of prostate cancer. Part II: Retrospective analysis of free/total prostate-specific analysis ratio, age-specific reference ranges, and PSA density. Bangma CH; Kranse R; Blijenberg BG; Schröder FH Urology; 1995 Dec; 46(6):779-84. PubMed ID: 7502415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Yield of ultrasonography-guided transrectal biopsy in the diagnosis of carcinoma of the prostate]. Fernández González I; Ruiz Rubio JL; Llorente Abarca C; Aramburu González JA; Montes Díaz MJ; Herrero Payo A; Sánchez Sánchez E; Berenguer Sánchez A Arch Esp Urol; 1995; 48(6):587-94. PubMed ID: 7544968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of prostate specific antigen density and transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsies in 100 consecutive patients with a negative digital rectal examination and intermediate serum prostate specific antigen levels. Tarcan T; Ozveri H; Biren T; Türkeri L; Akdas A Int J Urol; 1997 Jul; 4(4):362-7. PubMed ID: 9256325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Examination for indication of systematic biopsy for diagnosis of prostate cancer]. Muraoka K; Takahashi C; Yamamoto Y; Watanabe T; Hirakawa S; Miyagawa I Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi; 1999 Jul; 90(7):657-62. PubMed ID: 10481471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multiple vesico-urethral biopsies following radical prostatectomy: the predictive roles of TRUS, DRE, PSA and the pathological stage. Scattoni V; Roscigno M; Raber M; Montorsi F; Da Pozzo L; Guazzoni G; Freschi M; Rigatti P Eur Urol; 2003 Oct; 44(4):407-14. PubMed ID: 14499673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Usefulness of digital rectal examination, serum prostate-specific antigen, transrectal ultrasonography and systematic prostate biopsy for the detection of organ-confined prostate cancer. Gohji K; Okamoto M; Morisue K; Fujii A Int J Urol; 1995 May; 2(2):116-20. PubMed ID: 7553283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Meta-analysis of prostate-specific antigen and digital rectal examination as screening tests for prostate carcinoma. Mistry K; Cable G J Am Board Fam Pract; 2003; 16(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 12665174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of additional sampling in the TRUS-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Stamatiou K; Alevizos A; Karanasiou V; Mariolis A; Mihas C; Papathanasiou M; Bovis K; Sofras F Urol Int; 2007; 78(4):313-7. PubMed ID: 17495488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Evaluation of methods of detection for prostate neoplasm]. Zhong C; Chen M; Wan B Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2001 Jan; 23(1):64-6. PubMed ID: 11783074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prediction of prostate cancer risk: the role of prostate volume and digital rectal examination in the ERSPC risk calculators. Roobol MJ; van Vugt HA; Loeb S; Zhu X; Bul M; Bangma CH; van Leenders AG; Steyerberg EW; Schröder FH Eur Urol; 2012 Mar; 61(3):577-83. PubMed ID: 22104592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The digital rectal exam, prostate-specific antigen and transrectal echography in the diagnosis of prostatic cancer]. Martínez de Hurtado J; Chéchile Toniolo G; Villavicencio Mavrich H Arch Esp Urol; 1995 Apr; 48(3):247-59. PubMed ID: 7538749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic testing for prostate cancer detection: less is best. Babaian RJ; Dinney CP; Ramirez EI; Evans RB Urology; 1993 May; 41(5):421-5. PubMed ID: 7683834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Clinical utility of available diagnostic tests in prostatic carcinoma. Results of 500 biopsies. II. Rectal palpation, PSA, and transrectal echography]. Rodríguez Rodríguez R; Mayayo Dehesa T; Galbis Sanjuan F; Jiménez Cidre M; Burgos Revilla FJ; Gómez dos Santos V; García González R Arch Esp Urol; 1997 May; 50(4):339-45. PubMed ID: 9313042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]