119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15988815)
21. Prostate cancer risk assessment by the primary care physician and urologist: transabdominal- versus transrectal ultrasound prostate volume-based use of the Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator.
de Vos II; Drost FH; Bokhorst LP; Alberts AR; van Gelder M; Herman EM; Boswinkel WD; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ
Transl Androl Urol; 2023 Feb; 12(2):241-248. PubMed ID: 36915892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Age as one of the important criteria of prostate cancer diagnostic.].
Ponkratov SV; Oleksjuk AV; Oleksjuk IB; Kozlov KL
Adv Gerontol; 2021; 34(3):404-408. PubMed ID: 34409819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The Risk Factors and Screening Uptake for Prostate Cancer: A Scoping Review.
Mumuni S; O'Donnell C; Doody O
Healthcare (Basel); 2023 Oct; 11(20):. PubMed ID: 37893854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Diagnostic advantages of transrectal ultrasound with gastrointestinal agent instillation for rectal adenoma and early-stage rectal cancer: comparison of conventional transrectal ultrasound techniques.
Li X; Huang K; Liu Y; Zhang Z; Bian D
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2024 Mar; 14(3):2455-2465. PubMed ID: 38545046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The management of rectal bleeding following transrectal prostate biopsy: A review of the current literature.
Quinlan MR; Bolton D; Casey RG
Can Urol Assoc J; 2018 Mar; 12(3):E146-E153. PubMed ID: 29283091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. To Determine the Diagnostic Accuracy of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in the Diagnosis of Prostate Carcinoma Taking Histopathology As the Gold Standard.
Siddiqui K; Magsi K; Iqbal J; Ahmed A; Fazal A; Siddiqui I; Khan S
Cureus; 2021 Nov; 13(11):e19508. PubMed ID: 34912645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Primary care use by men with symptoms of possible prostate cancer: A multi-method study with an ethnically diverse sample in London.
Martins T; Walter FM; Penfold C; Abel G; Hamilton W
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2021 Nov; 30(6):e13482. PubMed ID: 34152656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Carcinoma of prostate masquerading as retroperitoneal lymphoma.
Kale S; Rashid T
Urol Case Rep; 2020 Nov; 33():101323. PubMed ID: 33102025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Diagnostic performance of prostate cancer antigen 3 and the Prostate Health Index in detecting overall and clinically significant prostate cancer in men at first biopsy: A meta-analysis.
Jia W; Wu B; Shao Y; Cao X; Wang D
Int J Urol; 2021 Mar; 28(3):315-325. PubMed ID: 33336418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The times they are a-changin': The evolution of prostate cancer screening practices and beliefs among primary care physicians in Victoria, British Columbia.
Spooner J; Birk M; Espinosa V; Hoag N
Can Urol Assoc J; 2021 Jun; 15(6):192-196. PubMed ID: 33212001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Digital Rectal Examination in Gastric Cancer Patients with Peritoneal Metastasis.
Guo J; Chen Y; Liu Z; Guan Y; Wang W; Sun X; Li W; Xu D
J Cancer; 2019; 10(6):1489-1495. PubMed ID: 31031858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Value of free/total prostate-specific antigen (f/t PSA) ratios for prostate cancer detection in patients with total serum prostate-specific antigen between 4 and 10 ng/mL: A meta-analysis.
Huang Y; Li ZZ; Huang YL; Song HJ; Wang YJ
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Mar; 97(13):e0249. PubMed ID: 29595681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Research progress on deep learning in magnetic resonance imaging-based diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer: a review on the current status and perspectives.
He M; Cao Y; Chi C; Yang X; Ramin R; Wang S; Yang G; Mukhtorov O; Zhang L; Kazantsev A; Enikeev M; Hu K
Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1189370. PubMed ID: 37546423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The Diagnostic Accuracy of Prostate-Specific Antigen and Digital Rectal Examination in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer at the University of Benin Teaching Hospital.
Ozah E; Imasogie DE
J West Afr Coll Surg; 2023; 13(3):91-95. PubMed ID: 37538216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Not Available].
Lass E; Raveendran L
Can Fam Physician; 2019 Nov; 65(11):e497-e499. PubMed ID: 31722931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Educational implications of changing the guidelines for the digital rectal examination.
Lass E; Raveendran L
Can Fam Physician; 2019 Nov; 65(11):838-840. PubMed ID: 31722918
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Detecting Prostate Cancer.
Brock M; von Bodman C; Palisaar J; Becker W; Martin-Seidel P; Noldus J
Dtsch Arztebl Int; 2015 Sep; 112(37):605-11. PubMed ID: 26396046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Accuracy of a high prostate-specific antigen level for prostate cancer diagnosis upon initial biopsy in Korean men.
Shim HB; Lee SE; Park HK; Ku JH
Yonsei Med J; 2007 Aug; 48(4):678-83. PubMed ID: 17722242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Imaging procedures to diagnose prostate cancer].
Seitz M; Scher B; Scherr M; Tilki D; Schlenker B; Gratzke C; Schipf A; Stanislaus P; Müller-Lisse U; Reich O; Stief C
Urologe A; 2007 Oct; 46(10):W1435-46; quiz W1447-8. PubMed ID: 17665166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Prostate-specific antigen, digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography: a meta-analysis for this diagnostic triad of prostate cancer in symptomatic korean men.
Song JM; Kim CB; Chung HC; Kane RL
Yonsei Med J; 2005 Jun; 46(3):414-24. PubMed ID: 15988815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
