255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1598889)
1. Mixed-dentition treatment.
Dugoni SA; Chee SO; Harnick DJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Jun; 101(6):501-8. PubMed ID: 1598889
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Mixed dentition treatment with cervical traction and lower lingual arch.
Odom WM
Angle Orthod; 1983 Oct; 53(4):329-42. PubMed ID: 6580833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The use of the bionator appliance in the treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusion in the late mixed dentition.
Tsamtsouris A; Vedrenne D
J Pedod; 1983; 8(1):78-104. PubMed ID: 6584584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The twin block traction technique.
Clark WJ
Eur J Orthod; 1982 May; 4(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 6955177
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. An alternative approach to distalizing a maxillary molar: case report.
Segura A; Full CA
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1997; 21(2):105-7. PubMed ID: 9484100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Early edgewise and interceptive treatment in Angle Class II division 1 in the mixed dentition].
Aknin JJ
Rev Orthop Dento Faciale; 1985 Oct; 19(4):479-504. PubMed ID: 3869860
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Is it possible to move molars distally with removable appliances?].
Vienne G
Rev Orthop Dento Faciale; 1975 Apr; 9(2):143-56. PubMed ID: 1078104
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative analysis of the orthodontic and orthopedic effects of maxillary traction.
Baumrind S; Korn EL; Isaacson RJ; West EE; Molthen R
Am J Orthod; 1983 Nov; 84(5):384-98. PubMed ID: 6579840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Translational distal shifting of the upper molars using headgear].
Poje Z
Acta Stomatol Croat; 1984; 18(3):169-74. PubMed ID: 6598282
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Distal movement without headgear: the use of an upper removable appliance for the retraction of upper first molars.
Lewis DH; Fox NA
Br J Orthod; 1996 Nov; 23(4):305-12. PubMed ID: 8985566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Control of anchorage in the antero-posterior and vertical planes in edgewise technics].
Bourriau G; Horn A
Rev Orthop Dento Faciale; 1985 Apr; 19(2):205-17. PubMed ID: 3865325
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Treatment effects of Fränkel, activator and extraoral traction appliances.
Righellis EG
Angle Orthod; 1983 Apr; 53(2):107-21. PubMed ID: 6576650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Biprotrusive Class II malocclusion treated with extra-oral directional force without posterior anchorage].
Bertele GP
Mondo Ortod; 1984; 9(3):41-7. PubMed ID: 6599298
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Utilizing a directional force system in class II mechanics.
Ríos SA
World J Orthod; 2005; 6(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 15794044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical application of the ACCO appliance. Part II.
Warren DW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Mar; 101(3):199-209. PubMed ID: 1539545
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [A new approach to the orthodontic treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion with a removable appliance (the J. A. Cervera C-Modeler)].
Albanese S
Arch Stomatol (Napoli); 1983; 24(3):425-33. PubMed ID: 6593021
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Two stage treatment of a Class II division I malocclusion. A case report.
Stewart TR
J Charles H. Tweed Int Found; 1985 Apr; 13():98-110. PubMed ID: 3861703
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Orthodontic case report: Class II, division II malocclusion.
Spencer CA
Tex Dent J; 1987 Mar; 104(3):19-21. PubMed ID: 3470969
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Intensive treatment in severe distal bite using the headgear-Herbst appliance in mixed dentition].
Wieslander L
Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed (1984); 1984 Nov; 94(11):1189-206. PubMed ID: 6595787
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The B.S.S.O. M. Orth. Prize of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 1996.
Spencer RJ
Br J Orthod; 1997 Nov; 24(4):285-91. PubMed ID: 9459026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
