These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15989167)

  • 21. Gender differences in use of hearing protection devices among farm operators.
    McCullagh MC; Banerjee T; Yang JJ; Bernick J; Duffy S; Redman R
    Noise Health; 2016; 18(85):368-375. PubMed ID: 27991469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Hearing protection field attenuation estimation systems and associated training for reducing workers' exposure to noise.
    Morata TC; Gong W; Tikka C; Samelli AG; Verbeek JH
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2024 May; 5(5):CD015066. PubMed ID: 38757544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effectiveness of an intervention to increase construction workers' use of hearing protection.
    Lusk SL; Hong OS; Ronis DL; Eakin BL; Kerr MJ; Early MR
    Hum Factors; 1999 Sep; 41(3):487-94. PubMed ID: 10665215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [The hearing self-protection behavior and internal factors of workers exposured to occupational noise].
    Yang J; Liu C; Lan YJ; Ta H; Wang YW
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2019 Oct; 37(10):773-777. PubMed ID: 31726510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Testing decisional balance and self-efficacy applied to workers' use of hearing protection.
    Raymond DM; Lusk SL
    Nurs Res; 2006; 55(5):328-35. PubMed ID: 16980833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Comparison of knowledge and behavior toward hearing protection among workers in different workplaces and its influence factors].
    Yang M; Ou ZZ; Yang M; He P; He DK; Chen HQ; Liao XQ
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2018 Jun; 36(6):413-415. PubMed ID: 30248733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Applying the health promotion model to development of a worksite intervention.
    Lusk SL; Kerr MJ; Ronis DL; Eakin BL
    Am J Health Promot; 1999; 13(4):219-27. PubMed ID: 10351852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Determinants of use of hearing protection devices in Canadian lumber mill workers.
    Sbihi H; Teschke K; MacNab YC; Davies HW
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Apr; 54(3):319-28. PubMed ID: 19570944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Predictors of hearing protection use among workers: implications for training programs.
    Lusk SL; Ronis DL; Kerr MJ
    Hum Factors; 1995 Sep; 37(3):635-40. PubMed ID: 8566999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Gender differences in blue collar workers' use of hearing protection.
    Lusk SL; Ronis DL; Baer LM
    Women Health; 1997; 25(4):69-89. PubMed ID: 9302730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Using the extended parallel process model to prevent noise-induced hearing loss among coal miners in Appalachia.
    Murray-Johnson L; Witte K; Patel D; Orrego V; Zuckerman C; Maxfield AM; Thimons ED
    Health Educ Behav; 2004 Dec; 31(6):741-55. PubMed ID: 15539545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Interventions to prevent occupational noise-induced hearing loss.
    Verbeek JH; Kateman E; Morata TC; Dreschler WA; Mischke C
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Oct; 10():CD006396. PubMed ID: 23076923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Noise and hearing protection: Latino construction workers' experiences.
    Robertson C; Kerr M; Garcia C; Halterman E
    AAOHN J; 2007 Apr; 55(4):153-60. PubMed ID: 17472130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Change of stages and related factors for wearing of hearing protection device among noisy workplace-workers].
    Kim YM; Jeong IS
    J Korean Acad Nurs; 2010 Oct; 40(5):736-46. PubMed ID: 21157175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A multi-component intervention to promote hearing protector use among construction workers.
    Seixas NS; Neitzel R; Stover B; Sheppard L; Daniell B; Edelson J; Meischke H
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Mar; 50 Suppl 1(0 1):S46-56. PubMed ID: 21091403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Gender and other factors associated with the use of hearing protection devices at work.
    Meira TC; Santana VS; Ferrite S
    Rev Saude Publica; 2015; 49():. PubMed ID: 26487294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An examination of ethnic differences in cigarette smoking intention among female teenagers.
    Hanson MJ
    J Am Acad Nurse Pract; 2005 Apr; 17(4):149-55. PubMed ID: 15819640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. What is the significance of black-white differences in risky sexual behavior?
    Johnson EH; Jackson LA; Hinkle Y; Gilbert D; Hoopwood T; Lollis CM; Willis C; Gant L
    J Natl Med Assoc; 1994 Oct; 86(10):745-59. PubMed ID: 7807559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A systematic review of the interventions to promote the wearing of hearing protection.
    El Dib RP; Atallah AN; Andriolo RB; Soares BG; Verbeek J
    Sao Paulo Med J; 2007 Nov; 125(6):362-9. PubMed ID: 18317609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Predictive factors of occupational noise-induced hearing loss in Spanish workers: A prospective study.
    Pelegrin AC; Canuet L; Rodríguez ÁA; Morales MP
    Noise Health; 2015; 17(78):343-9. PubMed ID: 26356377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.