These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15989395)

  • 1. Application of psychometric theory to the measurement of voice quality using rating scales.
    Shrivastav R; Sapienza CM; Nandur V
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Apr; 48(2):323-35. PubMed ID: 15989395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multidimensional scaling of breathy voice quality: individual differences in perception.
    Shrivastav R
    J Voice; 2006 Jun; 20(2):211-22. PubMed ID: 16165342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability and confidence in using a paired comparison paradigm in perceptual voice quality evaluation.
    Yiu EM; Chan KM; Mok RS
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2007 Feb; 21(2):129-45. PubMed ID: 17364621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of perceptual training on inexperienced listeners' judgments of dysphonic voice.
    Eadie TL; Baylor CR
    J Voice; 2006 Dec; 20(4):527-44. PubMed ID: 16324823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auditory-perceptual evaluation of disordered voice quality: pros, cons and future directions.
    Oates J
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2009; 61(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 19204393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability of clinician-based (GRBAS and CAPE-V) and patient-based (V-RQOL and IPVI) documentation of voice disorders.
    Karnell MP; Melton SD; Childes JM; Coleman TC; Dailey SA; Hoffman HT
    J Voice; 2007 Sep; 21(5):576-90. PubMed ID: 16822648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validity of rating scale measures of voice quality.
    Kreiman J; Gerratt BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Sep; 104(3 Pt 1):1598-608. PubMed ID: 9745743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Listener agreement for auditory-perceptual ratings of dysarthria.
    Bunton K; Kent RD; Duffy JR; Rosenbek JC; Kent JF
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Dec; 50(6):1481-95. PubMed ID: 18055769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceptual analysis in different voice samples: agreement and reliability.
    Muñoz J; Mendoza E; Fresneda MD; Carballo G; Ramirez I
    Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Jun; 94(3 Pt 2):1187-95. PubMed ID: 12186240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability in perceptual analysis of voice quality.
    Bele IV
    J Voice; 2005 Dec; 19(4):555-73. PubMed ID: 16301102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The reliability and validity of patient self-rating of their own voice quality.
    Lee M; Drinnan M; Carding P
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2005 Aug; 30(4):357-61. PubMed ID: 16209679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of anchors and training on the reliability of perceptual voice evaluation.
    Chan KM; Yiu EM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Feb; 45(1):111-26. PubMed ID: 14748643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can we perceptually rate alaryngeal voice? Developing the Sunderland Tracheoesophageal Voice Perceptual Scale.
    Hurren A; Hildreth AJ; Carding PN
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2009 Dec; 34(6):533-8. PubMed ID: 20070762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of two perceptual voice evaluation training programs for naive listeners.
    Chan KM; Yiu EM
    J Voice; 2006 Jun; 20(2):229-41. PubMed ID: 16139475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of consensus training on the reliability of auditory perceptual ratings of voice quality.
    Iwarsson J; Reinholt Petersen N
    J Voice; 2012 May; 26(3):304-12. PubMed ID: 21840170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability of perceptions of voice quality: evidence from a problem asthma clinic population.
    Sellars C; Stanton AE; McConnachie A; Dunnet CP; Chapman LM; Bucknall CE; MacKenzie K
    J Laryngol Otol; 2009 Jul; 123(7):755-63. PubMed ID: 19250586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differentiated vocal tract control and the reliability of interpretations of nasendoscopic assessment.
    Madill C; Sheard C; Heard R
    J Voice; 2010 May; 24(3):337-45. PubMed ID: 19660904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The relationship between ratings of voice quality and quality of life measures.
    Murry T; Medrado R; Hogikyan ND; Aviv JE
    J Voice; 2004 Jun; 18(2):183-92. PubMed ID: 15193651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of visible speech in the perceptual rating of pathological voices.
    Martens JW; Versnel H; Dejonckere PH
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Feb; 133(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 17309988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scaling of voice pleasantness and acceptability in tracheoesophageal speakers.
    Eadie TL; Doyle PC
    J Voice; 2005 Sep; 19(3):373-83. PubMed ID: 16102664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.