These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15989400)

  • 1. The incidence of error in young children's Wh-questions.
    Rowland CF; Pine JM; Lieven EV; Theakston AL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Apr; 48(2):384-404. PubMed ID: 15989400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Explaining errors in children's questions.
    Rowland CF
    Cognition; 2007 Jul; 104(1):106-34. PubMed ID: 16839536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The acquisition of auxiliary syntax: a longitudinal elicitation study. Part 1: auxiliary BE.
    Theakston AL; Rowland CF
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Dec; 52(6):1449-70. PubMed ID: 19951924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The acquisition of auxiliary syntax: a longitudinal elicitation study. Part 2: the modals and auxiliary DO.
    Rowland CF; Theakston AL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Dec; 52(6):1471-92. PubMed ID: 19951925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determinants of acquisition order in wh-questions: re-evaluating the role of caregiver speech.
    Rowland CF; Pine JM; Lieven EV; Theakston AL
    J Child Lang; 2003 Aug; 30(3):609-35. PubMed ID: 14513470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Usage-based vs. rule-based learning: the acquisition of word order in wh-questions in English and Norwegian.
    Westergaard M
    J Child Lang; 2009 Nov; 36(5):1023-51. PubMed ID: 19272194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Children's questions: a mechanism for cognitive development.
    Chouinard MM
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2007; 72(1):vii-ix, 1-112; discussion 113-26. PubMed ID: 17394580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An evaluation of the facilitative effects of inverted yes-no questions on the acquisition of auxiliary verbs.
    Fey ME; Loeb DF
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Feb; 45(1):160-74. PubMed ID: 14748646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Phonological constraints on children's production of English third person singular -s.
    Yung Song J; Sundara M; Demuth K
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Jun; 52(3):623-42. PubMed ID: 18952857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The prosodic (re)organization of children's early English articles.
    Demuth K; McCullough E
    J Child Lang; 2009 Jan; 36(1):173-200. PubMed ID: 18778531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can input explain children's me-for-I errors?
    Kirjavainen M; Theakston A; Lieven E
    J Child Lang; 2009 Nov; 36(5):1091-114. PubMed ID: 19220924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Subject-auxiliary inversion errors and wh-question acquisition: 'what children do know'?
    Rowland CF; Pine JM
    J Child Lang; 2000 Feb; 27(1):157-81. PubMed ID: 10740971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Early acquisition of gender agreement in the Spanish noun phrase: starting small.
    Mariscal S
    J Child Lang; 2009 Jan; 36(1):143-71. PubMed ID: 18761756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing different accounts of inversion errors in children's non-subject wh-questions: 'What experimental data can tell us?'.
    Ambridge B; Rowland CF; Theakston AL; Tomasello M
    J Child Lang; 2006 Aug; 33(3):519-57. PubMed ID: 17017278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of developmental levels in examining the effect of subject types on the production of auxiliary is in young english-speaking children.
    Guo LY; Owen Van Horne AJ; Tomblin JB
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 54(6):1658-66. PubMed ID: 22180021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Abstract categories or limited-scope formulae? The case of children's determiners.
    Valian V; Solt S; Stewart J
    J Child Lang; 2009 Sep; 36(4):743-78. PubMed ID: 19123961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Explaining quantitative variation in the rate of Optional Infinitive errors across languages: a comparison of MOSAIC and the Variational Learning Model.
    Freudenthal D; Pine J; Gobet F
    J Child Lang; 2010 Jun; 37(3):643-69. PubMed ID: 20334719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Language-specific effects of task demands on the manifestation of specific language impairment: a comparison of English and Icelandic.
    Thordardottir E
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Aug; 51(4):922-37. PubMed ID: 18658062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Individual differences in the onset of tense marking: a growth-curve analysis.
    Hadley PA; Holt JK
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Oct; 49(5):984-1000. PubMed ID: 17077210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Error patterns in young German children's wh-questions.
    Schmerse D; Lieven E; Tomasello M
    J Child Lang; 2013 Jun; 40(3):656-71. PubMed ID: 22631447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.