These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15989691)

  • 1. Comparative modelling of protein structure and its impact on microbial cell factories.
    Centeno NB; Planas-Iglesias J; Oliva B
    Microb Cell Fact; 2005 Jun; 4():20. PubMed ID: 15989691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Basic Protein Comparative Three-Dimensional Modeling Methodological Workflow Theory and Practice.
    Bitar M; Franco GR
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2014; 11(6):1052-65. PubMed ID: 26357043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Strategies for high-throughput comparative modeling: applications to leverage analysis in structural genomics and protein family organization.
    Mirkovic N; Li Z; Parnassa A; Murray D
    Proteins; 2007 Mar; 66(4):766-77. PubMed ID: 17154423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Incorporating comparative genomics into the design-test-learn cycle of microbial strain engineering.
    Sardi M; Gasch AP
    FEMS Yeast Res; 2017 Aug; 17(5):. PubMed ID: 28637316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. 100,000 protein structures for the biologist.
    Sali A
    Nat Struct Biol; 1998 Dec; 5(12):1029-32. PubMed ID: 9846869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. NMR in structural genomics to increase structural coverage of the protein universe: Delivered by Prof. Kurt Wüthrich on 7 July 2013 at the 38th FEBS Congress in St. Petersburg, Russia.
    Serrano P; Dutta SK; Proudfoot A; Mohanty B; Susac L; Martin B; Geralt M; Jaroszewski L; Godzik A; Elsliger M; Wilson IA; Wüthrich K
    FEBS J; 2016 Nov; 283(21):3870-3881. PubMed ID: 27154589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Industrial systems biology and its impact on synthetic biology of yeast cell factories.
    Fletcher E; Krivoruchko A; Nielsen J
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2016 Jun; 113(6):1164-70. PubMed ID: 26524089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automated protein structure homology modeling: a progress report.
    Kopp J; Schwede T
    Pharmacogenomics; 2004 Jun; 5(4):405-16. PubMed ID: 15165176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative Protein Structure Modeling Using MODELLER.
    Webb B; Sali A
    Curr Protoc Bioinformatics; 2014 Sep; 47():5.6.1-32. PubMed ID: 25199792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Protein structure prediction and analysis as a tool for functional genomics.
    Baker EN; Arcus VL; Lott JS
    Appl Bioinformatics; 2003; 2(3 Suppl):S3-10. PubMed ID: 15130810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hybrid schemes based on quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics simulations goals to success, problems, and perspectives.
    Ferrer S; Ruiz-Pernía J; Martí S; Moliner V; Tuñón I; Bertrán J; Andrés J
    Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol; 2011; 85():81-142. PubMed ID: 21920322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Chapter 1. Target selection in structural genomics projects to increase knowledge of protein structure and function space.
    Carter P; Lee D; Orengo C
    Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol; 2008; 75():1-52. PubMed ID: 20731988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Current Challenges in Liquid and Glass Science, (The Cosener's House, Abingdon 10-12 January 2007).
    Hannon AC; Salmon PS; Soper AK
    J Phys Condens Matter; 2007 Oct; 19(41):410301. PubMed ID: 28192312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Integrative computational approach for genome-based study of microbial lipid-degrading enzymes.
    Vorapreeda T; Thammarongtham C; Laoteng K
    World J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2016 Jul; 32(7):122. PubMed ID: 27263017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative modeling of proteins.
    Lushington GH
    Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1215():309-30. PubMed ID: 25330969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative modeling for protein structure prediction.
    Ginalski K
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2006 Apr; 16(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 16510277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Utilization and control of ecological interactions in polymicrobial infections and community-based microbial cell factories.
    Wigneswaran V; Amador CI; Jelsbak L; Sternberg C; Jelsbak L
    F1000Res; 2016; 5():. PubMed ID: 27092245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rapid and high-throughput construction of microbial cell-factories with regulatory noncoding RNAs.
    Chaudhary AK; Na D; Lee EY
    Biotechnol Adv; 2015 Nov; 33(6 Pt 1):914-30. PubMed ID: 26027891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Application of X-ray Diffraction and Electron Crystallography for Solving Complex Structure Problems.
    Li J; Sun J
    Acc Chem Res; 2017 Nov; 50(11):2737-2745. PubMed ID: 29091406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Targeting novel folds for structural genomics.
    McGuffin LJ; Jones DT
    Proteins; 2002 Jul; 48(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 12012336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.