These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15989749)

  • 1. Estimating the extent of parameter bias in the classical twin design: a comparison of parameter estimates from extended twin-family and classical twin designs.
    Coventry WL; Keller MC
    Twin Res Hum Genet; 2005 Jun; 8(3):214-23. PubMed ID: 15989749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantifying and addressing parameter indeterminacy in the classical twin design.
    Keller MC; Coventry WL
    Twin Res Hum Genet; 2005 Jun; 8(3):201-13. PubMed ID: 15989748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Are extended twin family designs worth the trouble? A comparison of the bias, precision, and accuracy of parameters estimated in four twin family models.
    Keller MC; Medland SE; Duncan LE
    Behav Genet; 2010 May; 40(3):377-93. PubMed ID: 20013306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Twin and Extended Pedigree Designs for Obtaining Heritability Estimates.
    Docherty AR; Kremen WS; Panizzon MS; Prom-Wormley EC; Franz CE; Lyons MJ; Eaves LJ; Neale MC
    Behav Genet; 2015 Jul; 45(4):461-6. PubMed ID: 25894926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A note on the statistical power in extended twin designs.
    Posthuma D; Boomsma DI
    Behav Genet; 2000 Mar; 30(2):147-58. PubMed ID: 10979605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimating Heritability from Nuclear Family and Pedigree Data.
    Bochud M
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1666():195-210. PubMed ID: 28980247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Type I Error Rates and Parameter Bias in Multivariate Behavioral Genetic Models.
    Verhulst B; Prom-Wormley E; Keller M; Medland S; Neale MC
    Behav Genet; 2019 Jan; 49(1):99-111. PubMed ID: 30569348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using non-normal SEM to resolve the ACDE model in the classical twin design.
    Ozaki K; Toyoda H; Iwama N; Kubo S; Ando J
    Behav Genet; 2011 Mar; 41(2):329-39. PubMed ID: 20703791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating heritability from nuclear family and pedigree data.
    Bochud M
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 850():171-86. PubMed ID: 22307699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Classical twin design in modern pharmacogenomics studies.
    Rahmioğlu N; Ahmadi KR
    Pharmacogenomics; 2010 Feb; 11(2):215-26. PubMed ID: 20136360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How meaningful are heritability estimates of liability?
    Benchek PH; Morris NJ
    Hum Genet; 2013 Dec; 132(12):1351-60. PubMed ID: 23867980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Widespread evidence for non-additive genetic variation in Cloninger's and Eysenck's personality dimensions using a twin plus sibling design.
    Keller MC; Coventry WL; Heath AC; Martin NG
    Behav Genet; 2005 Nov; 35(6):707-21. PubMed ID: 16273321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of censoring on parameter estimates and power in genetic modeling.
    Derks EM; Dolan CV; Boomsma DI
    Twin Res; 2004 Dec; 7(6):659-69. PubMed ID: 15607017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Familial resemblance and heritability.
    Rice TK
    Adv Genet; 2008; 60():35-49. PubMed ID: 18358315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the covariance between parameter estimates in models of twin data.
    Williams CJ
    Biometrics; 1993 Jun; 49(2):557-68. PubMed ID: 8369388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Power of the classical twin design revisited.
    Visscher PM
    Twin Res; 2004 Oct; 7(5):505-12. PubMed ID: 15527666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Incorporating heterogeneous parent-child environmental effects in biometrical genetic models.
    Guo X; Liu D; Wen C; He M; Wang X
    Stat Med; 2013 Sep; 32(20):3501-8. PubMed ID: 23564662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of analysis of variance and maximum likelihood based path analysis of twin data: partitioning genetic and environmental sources of covariance.
    Christian JC; Norton JA; Sorbel J; Williams CJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 1995; 12(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 7713398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A model of gene-gene and gene-environment interactions and its implications for targeting environmental interventions by genotype.
    Wallace HM
    Theor Biol Med Model; 2006 Oct; 3():35. PubMed ID: 17029623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The latent class twin method.
    Baker SG
    Biometrics; 2016 Sep; 72(3):827-34. PubMed ID: 26753781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.