BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1598987)

  • 1. Effects of sample size on the latency and amplitude of the auditory evoked response.
    Beattie RC; Zipp JA; Schaffer CA; Silzel KL
    Am J Otol; 1992 Jan; 13(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 1598987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Effect of stimulus rise time and high-pass masking on early auditory evoked potentials].
    Bunke D; von Specht H; Mühler R; Pethe J; Kevanishvili Z
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 Apr; 77(4):185-90. PubMed ID: 9592750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of auditory steady-state responses and auditory brainstem responses in audiometric assessment of adults with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Lin YH; Ho HC; Wu HP
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2009 Apr; 36(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 18620826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-term audiometric follow-up of click-evoked auditory brainstem response in hearing-impaired infants.
    Schoonhoven R; Lamoré PJ; de Laat JA; Grote JJ
    Audiology; 2000; 39(3):135-45. PubMed ID: 10905399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The pattern of auditory brainstem response wave V maturation in cochlear-implanted children.
    Thai-Van H; Cozma S; Boutitie F; Disant F; Truy E; Collet L
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Mar; 118(3):676-89. PubMed ID: 17223382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detection and differentiation of sensorineural hearing loss in mice using auditory steady-state responses and transient auditory brainstem responses.
    Pauli-Magnus D; Hoch G; Strenzke N; Anderson S; Jentsch TJ; Moser T
    Neuroscience; 2007 Nov; 149(3):673-84. PubMed ID: 17869440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory brainstem response audiometry in neonatal hydrocephalus.
    Edwards CG; Durieux-Smith A; Picton TW
    J Otolaryngol Suppl; 1985 Feb; 14():40-6. PubMed ID: 3864992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of electrode montage on the amplitude of wave V in the auditory brainstem response to maximum length sequence stimuli.
    Dzulkarnain AA; Wilson WJ; Bradley AP; Petoe M
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 17715464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Examination of reaction time--auditory brainstem responses--ABR in noise induced temporary and permanent threshold shift].
    Janczewski G; Kochanek K; Dawidowicz J; Tanzariello A; Dobrzyński P; Bardadin J
    Med Pr; 1991; 42(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 1921713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Auditory brainstem responses (ABR) in normal hearing adult subjects with Down's syndrome.
    Forti S; Amadeo C; Fagnani E; Filipponi E; Pignataro L; Cesarani A; Ambrosetti U
    Brain Res; 2008 Oct; 1233():58-62. PubMed ID: 18703027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory-evoked response in the clinically normal dog: early latency components.
    Sims MH; Moore RE
    Am J Vet Res; 1984 Oct; 45(10):2019-27. PubMed ID: 6497099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Evaluation of the effect of auditory fatigue on the human ear by auditory brain stem responses (ABR). I. Effect of auditory fatigue on temporary threshold shifts of ABR].
    Janczewski G; Kochanek K; Dawidowicz J; Dobrzyński P; Checiński P
    Med Pr; 1988; 39(2):108-14. PubMed ID: 3210960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Diagnosis of hearing disorders in premature infants].
    Begall K; Pethe J; von Specht H; Köditz H
    Padiatr Grenzgeb; 1993; 31(5):321-9. PubMed ID: 8202320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Brain stem auditory-evoked response of the nonanesthetized dog.
    Marshall AE
    Am J Vet Res; 1985 Apr; 46(4):966-73. PubMed ID: 4014849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Brainstem auditory evoked potential monitoring: when is change in wave V significant?
    James ML; Husain AM
    Neurology; 2005 Nov; 65(10):1551-5. PubMed ID: 16301480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions: hit and false-positive rates in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Musiek FE; Baran JA
    Am J Otol; 1997 Jul; 18(4):454-61. PubMed ID: 9233485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical interpretation of brainstem evoked response audiometry abnormalities in cochlear pathology.
    Lajtman Z; Borcić V; Markov D; Popović-Kovacić J; Vincelj J; Krpan D
    Acta Med Croatica; 1999; 53(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 10705632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of auditory brainstem response results in normal-hearing patients with and without tinnitus.
    Kehrle HM; Granjeiro RC; Sampaio AL; Bezerra R; Almeida VF; Oliveira CA
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Jun; 134(6):647-51. PubMed ID: 18559734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Determining the cause of hearing loss: differential diagnosis using a comparison of audiometric and otoacoustic emission responses.
    Mills DM
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):508-25. PubMed ID: 16957501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative analysis of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in implanted children with auditory neuropathy/dyssynchrony.
    Runge-Samuelson CL; Drake S; Wackym PA
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 18025997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.