These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15991032)
1. Differences in visuomotor control between the upper and lower visual fields. Khan MA; Lawrence GP Exp Brain Res; 2005 Jul; 164(3):395-8. PubMed ID: 15991032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. No evidence of a lower visual field specialization for visuomotor control. Binsted G; Heath M Exp Brain Res; 2005 Mar; 162(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 15517212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does perception asymmetrically influence motor production in upper and lower visual fields? Brownell K; Rolheiser T; Heath M; Binsted G Motor Control; 2010 Jan; 14(1):44-58. PubMed ID: 20237402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Perceptual processing time differences owing to visual field asymmetries. Carlsen AN; Maslovat D; Chua R; Franks IM Neuroreport; 2007 Jul; 18(10):1067-70. PubMed ID: 17558298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A lower visual field advantage for endpoint stability but no advantage for online movement precision. Krigolson O; Heath M Exp Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 170(1):127-35. PubMed ID: 16501960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Visual regulation of manual aiming: a comparison of methods. Elliott D; Hansen S Behav Res Methods; 2010 Nov; 42(4):1087-95. PubMed ID: 21139176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The use of online control: a developmental perspective. McKay SM; Weir PL Dev Neuropsychol; 2004; 25(3):299-320. PubMed ID: 15148001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Difference in stimulus-response compatibility effect in premotor and motor time between upper and lower limbs. Kato Y; Asami T Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Dec; 87(3 Pt 1):939-46. PubMed ID: 9885062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The contribution of peripheral and central vision in the control of movement amplitude. Lawrence GP; Khan MA; Buckolz E; Oldham AR Hum Mov Sci; 2006 Jun; 25(3):326-38. PubMed ID: 16616964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of movement kinematics on visuomotor adaptation. Simon A; Bock O Exp Brain Res; 2016 Nov; 234(11):3083-3090. PubMed ID: 27349994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reaction times for allocentric movements are 35 ms slower than reaction times for target-directed movements. Thaler L; Goodale MA Exp Brain Res; 2011 Jun; 211(2):313-28. PubMed ID: 21516448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Role of vision in aperture closure control during reach-to-grasp movements. Rand MK; Lemay M; Squire LM; Shimansky YP; Stelmach GE Exp Brain Res; 2007 Aug; 181(3):447-60. PubMed ID: 17476491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Ebbinghaus illusion affects on-line movement control. Handlovsky I; Hansen S; Lee TD; Elliott D Neurosci Lett; 2004 Aug; 366(3):308-11. PubMed ID: 15288440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The utilization of visual feedback from peripheral and central vision in the control of direction. Khan MA; Lawrence GP; Franks IM; Buckolz E Exp Brain Res; 2004 Sep; 158(2):241-51. PubMed ID: 15127170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Different mechanisms involved in interhemispheric transfer of visuomotor information. Omura K; Tsukamoto T; Kotani Y; Ohgami Y; Minami M; Inoue Y Neuroreport; 2004 Dec; 15(18):2707-11. PubMed ID: 15597039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Visuomotor coordination and motor representation by human temporal lobe neurons. Tankus A; Fried I J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Mar; 24(3):600-10. PubMed ID: 22066588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]