330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15991405)
1. Why Ashcroft is wrong on assisted suicide.
Lund N
Commentary; 2002 Feb; 113(2):50-5. PubMed ID: 15991405
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Who defines "legitimate medical practice?" Lessons learned from the Controlled Substances Act, physician-assisted suicide, and Oregon v. Ashcroft.
Gast S
Va J Soc Policy Law; 2002; 10(2):261-91. PubMed ID: 16493846
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Physician-assisted suicide in Oregon--an uncertain future.
Steinbrook R
N Engl J Med; 2002 Feb; 346(6):460-4. PubMed ID: 11832544
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Justices reject U.S. bid to block assisted suicide; Court, 6-3, says attorney general was wrong in Oregon case.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 2006 Jan; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 16432926
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The Supreme Court and the purposes of medicine.
Bloche MG
N Engl J Med; 2006 Mar; 354(10):993-5. PubMed ID: 16525134
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Physician-assisted suicide, medical ethics, and the future of the medical profession.
Kass LR; Lund N
Duquesne Law Rev; 1996; 35(1):395-425. PubMed ID: 12385315
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Conclusion: shaky foundations and slippery slopes.
Doerflinger RM
Duquesne Law Rev; 1996; 35(1):523-31. PubMed ID: 12385320
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Congress, controlled substances, and physician-assisted suicide--elephants in mouseholes.
Annas GJ
N Engl J Med; 2006 Mar; 354(10):1079-84. PubMed ID: 16525147
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Oregon v. Ashcroft: the battle over the soul of medicine.
Rich BA
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2003; 12(3):310-21. PubMed ID: 12889338
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The U.S. Attorney General's intrusion into medical practice.
Lowenstein E; Wanzer SH
N Engl J Med; 2002 Feb; 346(6):447-8. PubMed ID: 11832536
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The assisted-suicide decision.
N Y Times Web; 2006 Jan; ():A22. PubMed ID: 16429626
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. "Out, out brief candle": constitutionally prescribed suicide for the terminally ill.
Marzen TJ
Hastings Constit Law Q; 1994; 21(3):799-826. PubMed ID: 11863028
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Why involve physicians in assisted suicide?
Paris JJ
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Mar; 9(3):32-4. PubMed ID: 19247886
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Oregon v. Ashcroft.
United States. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Wests Fed Rep; 2004; 368():1118-49. PubMed ID: 16477722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Pain Relief Promotion Act: will it spell death to "death with dignity" or is it unconstitutional?
Fallek J
Fordham Urban Law J; 2000 Aug; 27(6):1739-92. PubMed ID: 12452153
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Pain Relief Promotion Act: Congress's misguided intervention into end-of-life care.
Buzzee SE
Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 2001; 70(1):217-49. PubMed ID: 16389683
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. U.S. acts to stop assisted suicides.
Verhovek SH
N Y Times Web; 2001 Nov; ():A1, A20. PubMed ID: 12159883
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Court rejects Ashcroft, backs suicide law.
Weinstein H
Los Angeles Times; 2004 May; ():A1, A23. PubMed ID: 15457627
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Euthanasia: orchestrating "the last syllable of...time".
Newman SA
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1991; 53(1):153-91. PubMed ID: 16145828
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Physician-assisted suicide and federalism.
Bix BH
Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 2003; 17(1):53-69. PubMed ID: 14986646
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
