These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15991725)

  • 21. Purification of oily wastewater by hybrid UF/MD.
    Gryta M; Karakulski K; Morawski AW
    Water Res; 2001 Oct; 35(15):3665-9. PubMed ID: 11561628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The removal of disinfection by-product precursors from water with ceramic membranes.
    Harman BI; Koseoglu H; Yigit NO; Sayilgan E; Beyhan M; Kitis M
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(3):547-55. PubMed ID: 20706002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Technical feasibility study of a low-cost hybrid PAC-UF system for wastewater reclamation and reuse: a focus on feedwater production for low-pressure boilers.
    Amosa MK; Jami MS; Alkhatib MF; Majozi T
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2016 Nov; 23(22):22554-22567. PubMed ID: 27557958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reverse osmosis membrane rejection for ersatz space mission wastewaters.
    Yoon Y; Lueptow RM
    Water Res; 2005 Sep; 39(14):3298-308. PubMed ID: 16005043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Treatment of laundry wastewater using polyethersulfone/polyvinylpyrollidone ultrafiltration membranes.
    Sumisha A; Arthanareeswaran G; Lukka Thuyavan Y; Ismail AF; Chakraborty S
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2015 Nov; 121():174-9. PubMed ID: 25890841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Magnetic field on fouling control of ultrafiltration membranes applied in treatment of a synthetic textile effluent.
    Carlesso F; Zin G; de Souza SM; Luccio MD; de Souza AA; Oliveira JV
    Environ Technol; 2016; 37(8):952-9. PubMed ID: 26496410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of filtration mode and backwash water on hydraulically irreversible fouling of ultrafiltration membrane.
    Chang H; Liu B; Liang H; Yu H; Shao S; Li G
    Chemosphere; 2017 Jul; 179():254-264. PubMed ID: 28371709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparative study on the treatment of raw and biologically treated textile effluents through submerged nanofiltration.
    Chen Q; Yang Y; Zhou M; Liu M; Yu S; Gao C
    J Hazard Mater; 2015 Mar; 284():121-9. PubMed ID: 25463225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Metal ions removal from wastewater or washing water from contaminated soil by ultrafiltration-complexation.
    Molinari R; Gallo S; Argurio P
    Water Res; 2004 Feb; 38(3):593-600. PubMed ID: 14723928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Intermittent operation of low pressure UF membranes for sewage reuse at household level.
    Diamantis VI; Anagnostopoulos K; Melidis P; Ntougias S; Aivasidis A
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 68(4):799-806. PubMed ID: 23985509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Optimization of operating conditions for the valorization of olive mill wastewater using membrane processes.
    De Almeida MS; Martins RC; Quinta-Ferreira RM; Gando-Ferreira LM
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Aug; 25(22):21968-21981. PubMed ID: 29797198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Removal of EDCs(BPA) by ultrafiltration and impact factors].
    Wang L; Dong BZ; Gao NY
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2007 Feb; 28(2):329-34. PubMed ID: 17489192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Oil industry wastewater treatment with fouling resistant membranes containing amphiphilic comb copolymers.
    Asatekin A; Mayes AM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Jun; 43(12):4487-92. PubMed ID: 19603666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Removal of phenyl-urea herbicides in ultrapure water by ultrafiltration and nanofiltration processes.
    Benitez FJ; Acero JL; Real FJ; Garcia C
    Water Res; 2009 Feb; 43(2):267-76. PubMed ID: 18947854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Removal of humic acid foulant from ultrafiltration membrane surface using photocatalytic oxidation process.
    Fang H; Sun DD; Wu M; Phay W; Tay JH
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):373-80. PubMed ID: 16003999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Membrane process for emulsified waste containing mineral oils and nonionic surfactants (alkylphenolethoxylate).
    Miyagi A; Nakajima M
    Water Res; 2002 Sep; 36(15):3889-97. PubMed ID: 12369534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of flux (transmembrane pressure) and membrane properties on fouling and rejection of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes treating perfluorooctane sulfonate containing wastewater.
    Tang CY; Fu QS; Criddle CS; Leckie JO
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Mar; 41(6):2008-14. PubMed ID: 17410798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Removal of phenol from coke-oven wastewater by cross-flow nanofiltration membranes.
    Kumar R; Pal P
    Water Environ Res; 2013 May; 85(5):447-55. PubMed ID: 23789574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Effect of charged ultrafiltration membrane on natural organic matter removal and membrane fouling].
    Hou J; Shao JH; He YL
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2010 Jun; 31(6):1525-31. PubMed ID: 20698267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Coupling Ultrafiltration-Based Processes to Concentrate Phenolic Compounds from Aqueous Goji Berry Extracts.
    Conidi C; Drioli E; Cassano A
    Molecules; 2020 Aug; 25(16):. PubMed ID: 32824751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.