126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15991727)
1. The efficiency of a sequencing batch biofilm reactor in organic carbon and phosphorus removal.
Prendergast J; Rodgers M; Healy MG
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2005; 40(8):1619-26. PubMed ID: 15991727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Nutrient removal in a sequencing batch biofilm reactor (SBBR) using a vertically moving biofilm system.
Rodgers M; Zhan XM; Burke MD
Environ Technol; 2004 Feb; 25(2):211-8. PubMed ID: 15116879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biological removal of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in a sequencing batch reactor.
Akin BS; Ugurlu A
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2003 Aug; 38(8):1479-88. PubMed ID: 12929802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Performance of nitrogen and phosphorus removal from municipal wastewater of different C/N ratios using intelligent controlled systems sequencing batch biofilm reactor ( SBBR)].
Jin YX; Feng CP; Ding DH; Hao CB; Song L
Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2011 Mar; 32(3):729-35. PubMed ID: 21634171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of sequencing batch reactor (SBR) and sequencing batch biofilm reactor (SBBR) for biological nutrient removal from simulated wastewater containing glucose as carbon source.
Kumar BM; Chaudhari S
Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(3):73-9. PubMed ID: 14518857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Nitrogen and phosphorus removal from domestic strength synthetic wastewater using an alternating pumped flow sequencing batch biofilm reactor.
Rodgers M; Wu G; Zhan X
J Environ Qual; 2008; 37(3):977-82. PubMed ID: 18453421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biofilm growth and characteristics in an alternating pumped sequencing batch biofilm reactor (APSBBR).
Zhan XM; Rodgers M; O'Reilly E
Water Res; 2006 Feb; 40(4):817-25. PubMed ID: 16436289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Biological nitrogen and phosphorus removal in the anaerobic-aerobic-anoxic-aerobic-anoxic-aerobic sequencing batch reactors].
Lü J; Chen YG; Gu GW
Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2008 Apr; 29(4):937-41. PubMed ID: 18637342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Behavior of total phosphorus removal in an intelligent controlled sequencing batch biofilm reactor for municipal wastewater treatment.
Cai W; Zhang B; Jin Y; Lei Z; Feng C; Ding D; Hu W; Chen N; Suemura T
Bioresour Technol; 2013 Mar; 132():190-6. PubMed ID: 23411447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Kinetic effects of anaerobic staging and aeration rates on sequencing batch moving bed biofilm reactors: Carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus treatment of cheese production wastewater.
Tsitouras A; Basu O; Al-Ghussain N; Delatolla R
Chemosphere; 2020 Aug; 252():126407. PubMed ID: 32182506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An evaluation of the performance and optimization of a new wastewater treatment technology: the air suction flow-biofilm reactor.
Forde P; Kennelly C; Gerrity S; Collins G; Clifford E
Environ Technol; 2015; 36(9-12):1188-204. PubMed ID: 25413003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Low-biodegradable composite chemical wastewater treatment by biofilm configured sequencing batch reactor (SBBR).
Mohan SV; Rao NC; Sarma PN
J Hazard Mater; 2007 Jun; 144(1-2):108-17. PubMed ID: 17097228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
Bal AS; Dhagat NN
Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Advancements of sequencing batch biofilm reactor for slaughterhouse wastewater assisted with response surface methodology.
Sadaf S; Singh AK; Iqbal J; Kumar RN; Sulejmanović J; Habila MA; Pinê Américo-Pinheiro JH; Sher F
Chemosphere; 2022 Nov; 307(Pt 3):135952. PubMed ID: 35964716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Practical aspects of nitrogen and phosphorous removal with floating media SBBR.
Joeng H; Choi E; Yun Z; Park JB
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2003; 38(10):2135-45. PubMed ID: 14524668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Enhanced biological phosphorus removal in a semi full-scale SBBR.
Arnz P; Arnold E; Wilderer PA
Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(3):167-74. PubMed ID: 11381901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of intermittently aerated continuous and batch biofilm reactor in nutrient removal.
Altinbaş U; Oztürk I
Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(11-12):371-6. PubMed ID: 14753558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pumped flow biofilm reactors (PFBR) for treating municipal wastewater.
O'Reilly E; Rodgers M; Zhan XM
Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(12):1857-65. PubMed ID: 18587171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the performance of MBBR and SBR systems for the treatment of anaerobic reactor biowaste effluent.
Comett-Ambriz I; Gonzalez-Martinez S; Wilderer P
Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(12):155-61. PubMed ID: 12926683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Partial nutrient removal under insufficient organic carbon from digested swine wastewater in sequencing batch biofilm reactor.
Kritsunankul C; Wantawin C
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2008 Jul; 43(9):1085-92. PubMed ID: 18569324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
