127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15992283)
1. Detection of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts in experimentally contaminated lettuce using filtration, immunomagnetic separation, light microscopy, and PCR.
Ripabelli G; Leone A; Sammarco ML; Fanelli I; Grasso GM; McLauchlin J
Foodborne Pathog Dis; 2004; 1(4):216-22. PubMed ID: 15992283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Towards standard methods for the detection of Cryptosporidium parvum on lettuce and raspberries. Part 1: development and optimization of methods.
Cook N; Paton CA; Wilkinson N; Nichols RA; Barker K; Smith HV
Int J Food Microbiol; 2006 Jun; 109(3):215-21. PubMed ID: 16529835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Towards standard methods for the detection of Cryptosporidium parvum on lettuce and raspberries. Part 2: validation.
Cook N; Paton CA; Wilkinson N; Nichols RA; Barker K; Smith HV
Int J Food Microbiol; 2006 Jun; 109(3):222-8. PubMed ID: 16546283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An immunomagnetic separation-real-time PCR method for quantification of Cryptosporidium parvum in water samples.
Fontaine M; Guillot E
J Microbiol Methods; 2003 Jul; 54(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 12732419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detection and discrimination of Cryptosporidium parvum and C. hominis in water samples by immunomagnetic separation-PCR.
Ochiai Y; Takada C; Hosaka M
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2005 Feb; 71(2):898-903. PubMed ID: 15691946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Cryptosporidium oocyst recovery methods for their applicability for monitoring of consumer-ready fresh shellfish.
Kaupke A; Osiński Z; Rzeżutka A
Int J Food Microbiol; 2019 May; 296():14-20. PubMed ID: 30826538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An immunomagnetic separation-reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (IMS-RT-PCR) test for sensitive and rapid detection of viable waterborne Cryptosporidium parvum.
Hallier-Soulier S; Guillot E
Environ Microbiol; 2003 Jul; 5(7):592-8. PubMed ID: 12823191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Immunomagnetic capture PCR to detect viable Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts from environmental samples.
Deng MQ; Cliver DO; Mariam TW
Appl Environ Microbiol; 1997 Aug; 63(8):3134-8. PubMed ID: 9251200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Immunomagnetic separation (IMS)-fluorescent antibody detection and IMS-PCR detection of seeded Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts in natural waters and their limitations.
Sturbaum GD; Klonicki PT; Marshall MM; Jost BH; Clay BL; Sterling CR
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2002 Jun; 68(6):2991-6. PubMed ID: 12039759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development of an immunomagnetic bead separation-coupled quantitative PCR method for rapid and sensitive detection of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts in calf feces.
Gao S; Zhang M; Amer S; Luo J; Wang C; Wu S; Zhao B; He H
Parasitol Res; 2014 Jun; 113(6):2069-77. PubMed ID: 24687282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts on fresh vegetables and 1 herbs using antibodies specific for a Cryptosporidium parvum viral antigen.
Kniel KE; Jenkins MC
J Food Prot; 2005 May; 68(5):1093-6. PubMed ID: 15895749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Direct detection of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts by immunomagnetic separation-polymerase chain reaction in raw milk.
Di Pinto A; Tantillo MG
J Food Prot; 2002 Aug; 65(8):1345-8. PubMed ID: 12182493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Immunomagnetic separation of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts using MACS MicroBeads and high gradient separation columns.
Deng MQ; Lam KM; Cliver DO
J Microbiol Methods; 2000 Mar; 40(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 10739338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection of cryptosporidia and Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts in environmental water samples by immunomagnetic separation-polymerase chain reaction.
Hallier-Soulier S; Guillot E
J Appl Microbiol; 2000 Jul; 89(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 10945772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Recovery and detection of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts from water samples using continuous flow centrifugation.
Higgins JA; Trout JM; Fayer R; Shelton D; Jenkins MC
Water Res; 2003 Sep; 37(15):3551-60. PubMed ID: 12867321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An immunomagnetic separation polymerase chain reaction assay for rapid and ultra-sensitive detection of Cryptosporidium parvum in drinking water.
Hallier-Soulier S; Guillot E
FEMS Microbiol Lett; 1999 Jul; 176(2):285-9. PubMed ID: 10427711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of assays for sensitive and reproducible detection of cell culture-infectious Cryptosporidium parvum and Cryptosporidium hominis in drinking water.
Johnson AM; Giovanni GD; Rochelle PA
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2012 Jan; 78(1):156-62. PubMed ID: 22038611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of methods for improved detection of Cryptosporidium spp. in mussels (Mytilus californianus).
Miller WA; Gardner IA; Atwill ER; Leutenegger CM; Miller MA; Hedrick RP; Melli AC; Barnes NM; Conrad PA
J Microbiol Methods; 2006 Jun; 65(3):367-79. PubMed ID: 16181691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clams (Corbicula fluminea) as bioindicators of fecal contamination with Cryptosporidium and Giardia spp. in freshwater ecosystems in California.
Miller WA; Atwill ER; Gardner IA; Miller MA; Fritz HM; Hedrick RP; Melli AC; Barnes NM; Conrad PA
Int J Parasitol; 2005 May; 35(6):673-84. PubMed ID: 15862580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Utility of the Cryptosporidium oocyst wall protein (COWP) gene in a nested PCR approach for detection infection in cattle.
Kato S; Lindergard G; Mohammed HO
Vet Parasitol; 2003 Feb; 111(2-3):153-9. PubMed ID: 12531291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
