These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15992462)
21. Diagnostic values of digital rectal examination, prostate specific antigen and trans-rectal ultrasound in men with prostatism. Manyahi JP; Musau P; Mteta AK East Afr Med J; 2009 Sep; 86(9):450-3. PubMed ID: 21644416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Extended use of Prostate Health Index and percentage of [-2]pro-prostate-specific antigen in Chinese men with prostate specific antigen 10-20 ng/mL and normal digital rectal examination. Chiu PK; Teoh JY; Lee WM; Yee CH; Chan ES; Hou SM; Ng CF Investig Clin Urol; 2016 Sep; 57(5):336-42. PubMed ID: 27617315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Volume-adjusted prostate-specific antigen (PSA) variables in detecting impalpable prostate cancer in men with PSA levels of 2-4 ng/mL: transabdominal measurement makes a significant contribution. Kobayashi T; Kawahara T; Nishizawa K; Ogura K; Mitsumori K; Ide Y BJU Int; 2005 Jun; 95(9):1245-8. PubMed ID: 15892809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The digital rectal examination (DRE) remains important - outcomes from a contemporary cohort of men undergoing an initial 12-18 core prostate needle biopsy. Palmerola R; Smith P; Elliot V; Reese CT; Mahon FB; Harpster LE; Icitovic N; Raman JD Can J Urol; 2012 Dec; 19(6):6542-7. PubMed ID: 23228289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [The digital rectal exam, prostate-specific antigen and transrectal echography in the diagnosis of prostatic cancer]. Martínez de Hurtado J; Chéchile Toniolo G; Villavicencio Mavrich H Arch Esp Urol; 1995 Apr; 48(3):247-59. PubMed ID: 7538749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Early detection of prostate cancer in the ESRD population. Khairullah QT; Pamatmat SD; Chatha M; Provenzano R; Telang D; Temple M Clin Nephrol; 2004 May; 61(5):308-15. PubMed ID: 15182125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A multicenter study on the detection of prostate cancer by digital rectal examination and prostate-specific antigen in men with or without urinary symptoms. Cooperative Group for Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol; 1997; 32(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 9286642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Clinicopathological features of prostate cancer detected by transrectal ultrasonography-guided systematic six-sextant biopsy. Ito K; Ichinose Y; Kubota Y; Imai K; Yamanaka H Int J Urol; 1997 Sep; 4(5):474-9. PubMed ID: 9354949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Relative contribution of digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography in interpreting serum prostate-specific antigen values for screening prostate cancer in Arab men. Sheikh M; Sinan T; Kehinde EO; Hussein AY; Anim JT; Al-Hunayan AA Ann Saudi Med; 2007; 27(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 17356323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Potential predictive factors of positive prostate biopsy in the Japanese population. Shigemura K; Arakawa S; Yamanaka K; Yasui N; Matsubara S; Iwamoto T; Kataoka N; Yuien K; Fujisawa M Int Urol Nephrol; 2008; 40(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 17610138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Development of a nomogram that predicts the probability of a positive prostate biopsy in men with an abnormal digital rectal examination and a prostate-specific antigen between 0 and 4 ng/mL. Eastham JA; May R; Robertson JL; Sartor O; Kattan MW Urology; 1999 Oct; 54(4):709-13. PubMed ID: 10510933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Detection of prostatic carcinoma: the role of TRUS, TRUS guided biopsy, digital rectal examination, PSA and PSA density. Men S; Cakar B; Conkbayir I; Hekimoglu B J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2001 Dec; 20(4):473-80. PubMed ID: 11876539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Relationship between screening by stratifying cases into groups on prostate specific antigen level and the positive rate of transrectal ultrasound guided systematic sextant prostate biopsy]. Cao XL; Gao JP; Han G; Tang J; Hong BF Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Mar; 44(6):372-5. PubMed ID: 16638344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Local anesthesia type affects cancer detection rate in transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. Temiz MZ; Kandirali E; Colakerol A; Tuken M; Semercioz A Int Braz J Urol; 2015; 41(5):859-63. PubMed ID: 26689511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The role of prostate-specific antigen as part of the diagnostic triad and as a guide when to perform a biopsy. Babaian RJ; Camps JL Cancer; 1991 Nov; 68(9):2060-3. PubMed ID: 1717134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cost-effective prostate cancer detection. Reduction of low-yield biopsies. Investigators of the American Cancer Society National Prostate Cancer Detection Project. Littrup PJ; Kane RA; Mettlin CJ; Murphy GP; Lee F; Toi A; Badalament R; Babaian R Cancer; 1994 Dec; 74(12):3146-58. PubMed ID: 7526969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Diagnostic yield of repeated transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsies stratified by specific histopathologic diagnoses and prostate specific antigen levels. Roehrborn CG; Pickens GJ; Sanders JS Urology; 1996 Mar; 47(3):347-52. PubMed ID: 8633400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of prostatic specific antigen and digital rectal examination as screening tests for prostate cancer. Candas B; Cusan L; Gomez JL; Diamond P; Suburu RE; Lévesque J; Brousseau G; Bélanger A; Labrie F Prostate; 2000 Sep; 45(1):19-35. PubMed ID: 10960839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Diagnostic significance of digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography in men with prostate-specific antigen levels of 4 NG/ML or less. Yamamoto T; Ito K; Ohi M; Kubota Y; Suzuki K; Fukabori Y; Kurokawa K; Yamanaka H Urology; 2001 Dec; 58(6):994-8. PubMed ID: 11744475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Clinical evaluation of transrectal power doppler imaging in the detection of prostate cancer. Inahara M; Suzuki H; Nakamachi H; Kamiya N; Shimbo M; Komiya A; Ueda T; Ichikawa T; Akakura K; Ito H Int Urol Nephrol; 2004; 36(2):175-80. PubMed ID: 15368688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]