These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15993452)

  • 1. An integrated framework for health and ecological risk assessment.
    Suter GW; Vermeire T; Munns WR; Sekizawa J
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2005 Sep; 207(2 Suppl):611-6. PubMed ID: 15993452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bottom-up and top-down integration of human and ecological risk assessment.
    Suter GW
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2004 Apr 23-May 28; 67(8-10):779-90. PubMed ID: 15192868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The contrast between risk assessment and rules of evidence in the context of international trade disputes: can the US experience inform the process?
    Anderson EL; Hilaire CS
    Risk Anal; 2004 Apr; 24(2):449-59. PubMed ID: 15078316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Framework for metals risk assessment.
    Fairbrother A; Wenstel R; Sappington K; Wood W
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2007 Oct; 68(2):145-227. PubMed ID: 17889701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ecological effects of diffuse mixed pollution are site-specific and require higher-tier risk assessment to improve site management decisions: a discussion paper.
    Leo P; Eijsackers HJ; Koelmans AA; Vijver MG
    Sci Total Environ; 2008 Dec; 406(3):503-17. PubMed ID: 18757078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Enhancing the ecological risk assessment process.
    Dale VH; Biddinger GR; Newman MC; Oris JT; Suter GW; Thompson T; Armitage TM; Meyer JL; Allen-King RM; Burton GA; Chapman PM; Conquest LL; Fernandez IJ; Landis WG; Master LL; Mitsch WJ; Mueller TC; Rabeni CF; Rodewald AD; Sanders JG; van Heerden IL
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2008 Jul; 4(3):306-13. PubMed ID: 18324871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk assessment for invasive species.
    Andersen MC; Adams H; Hope B; Powell M
    Risk Anal; 2004 Aug; 24(4):787-93. PubMed ID: 15357799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A conceptual framework to assess the risks of human disease following exposure to pathogens. ILSI Risk Science Institute Pathogen Risk Assessment Working Group.
    Risk Anal; 1996 Dec; 16(6):841-8. PubMed ID: 8972112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Holistic risk assessment: an emerging process for environmental decisions.
    Harvey T; Mahaffey KR; Velazquez S; Dourson M
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1995 Oct; 22(2):110-7. PubMed ID: 8577946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A framework for the integration of ecosystem and human health in public policy: two case studies with infectious agents.
    Koren HS; Crawford-Brown D
    Environ Res; 2004 May; 95(1):92-105. PubMed ID: 15068935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The strengths of the ecological risk assessment process: linking science to decision making.
    Barnthouse L
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2008 Jul; 4(3):299-305. PubMed ID: 18597567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Need for an "integrated safety assessment" of GMOs, linking food safety and environmental considerations.
    Haslberger AG
    J Agric Food Chem; 2006 May; 54(9):3173-80. PubMed ID: 16637668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Human health and environmental risk assessment: the need for a more harmonised and integrated approach.
    Bridges J
    Chemosphere; 2003 Sep; 52(9):1347-51. PubMed ID: 12867163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Limitations of the current practices used to perform ecological risk assessment.
    Kapustka L
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2008 Jul; 4(3):290-8. PubMed ID: 18324872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Environmental risk evaluation of chemicals: achievements of the project and seeds for future--development of metrics for evaluating risks.
    Nakanishi J; Gamo M; Iwasa Y; Tanaka Y
    Chemosphere; 2003 Oct; 53(4):389-98. PubMed ID: 12946396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Which aspects of non-clinical quality of care are most important? Results from WHO's general population surveys of "health systems responsiveness" in 41 countries.
    Valentine N; Darby C; Bonsel GJ
    Soc Sci Med; 2008 May; 66(9):1939-50. PubMed ID: 18313822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An examination of ecological risk assessment and management practices.
    Hope BK
    Environ Int; 2006 Dec; 32(8):983-95. PubMed ID: 16843527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. WHO health risk assessment process for static fields.
    van Deventer TE; Saunders R; Repacholi MH
    Prog Biophys Mol Biol; 2005; 87(2-3):355-63. PubMed ID: 15556671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.