These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15993533)

  • 1. The shadow price of substitutable sulfur in the US electric power plant: a distance function approach.
    Lee M
    J Environ Manage; 2005 Oct; 77(2):104-10. PubMed ID: 15993533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accelerated reduction in SO₂ emissions from the U.S. power sector triggered by changing prices of natural gas.
    Lu X; McElroy MB; Wu G; Nielsen CP
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Jul; 46(14):7882-9. PubMed ID: 22724530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implications of the recent reductions in natural gas prices for emissions of CO2 from the US power sector.
    Lu X; Salovaara J; McElroy MB
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Mar; 46(5):3014-21. PubMed ID: 22321206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Uncertainty and variability in health-related damages from coal-fired power plants in the United States.
    Levy JI; Baxter LK; Schwartz J
    Risk Anal; 2009 Jul; 29(7):1000-14. PubMed ID: 19392676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implications of near-term coal power plant retirement for SO2 and NOX and life cycle GHG emissions.
    Venkatesh A; Jaramillo P; Griffin WM; Matthews HS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Sep; 46(18):9838-45. PubMed ID: 22888978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Economics of an integrated approach to control SO2, NOX, HCl, and particulate emissions from power plants.
    Shemwell BE; Ergut A; Levendis YA
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2002 May; 52(5):521-34. PubMed ID: 12022692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Air quality impacts of power plant emissions in Beijing.
    Hao J; Wang L; Shen M; Li L; Hu J
    Environ Pollut; 2007 May; 147(2):401-8. PubMed ID: 16899328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating the effect of air pollution from a coal-fired power station on the development of children's pulmonary function.
    Dubnov J; Barchana M; Rishpon S; Leventhal A; Segal I; Carel R; Portnov BA
    Environ Res; 2007 Jan; 103(1):87-98. PubMed ID: 16618483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating the benefits of pollution reduction on agricultural yields: Taiwan's air pollution emission fees program.
    Chen TY; Li CS
    J Environ Manage; 2003 Jul; 68(3):287-96. PubMed ID: 12837257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Supply curves for using powder river basin coal to reduce sulfur emissions.
    Malvadkar SB; Smith D; McGurl GV
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2004 Jun; 54(6):741-9. PubMed ID: 15242153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. International trade and air pollution: estimating the economic costs of air emissions from waterborne commerce vessels in the United States.
    Gallagher KP
    J Environ Manage; 2005 Oct; 77(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 15992989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost-effective control of SO2 emissions in Asia.
    Cofala J; Amann M; Gyarfas F; Schoepp W; Boudri JC; Hordijk L; Kroeze C; Junfeng L; Lin D; Panwar TS; Gupta S
    J Environ Manage; 2004 Sep; 72(3):149-61. PubMed ID: 15251221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The cost of carbon capture and storage for natural gas combined cycle power plants.
    Rubin ES; Zhai H
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Mar; 46(6):3076-84. PubMed ID: 22332665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dynamic Management of NOx and SO2 Emissions in the Texas and Mid-Atlantic Electric Power Systems and Implications for Air Quality.
    McDonald-Buller E; Kimura Y; Craig M; McGaughey G; Allen D; Webster M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Feb; 50(3):1611-9. PubMed ID: 26727552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modeling the effects of changes in new source review on national SO2 and NOx emissions from electricity-generating units.
    Evans DA; Hobbs BF; Oren C; Palmer KL
    Environ Sci Technol; 2008 Jan; 42(2):347-53. PubMed ID: 18284129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Emissions impacts of wind and energy storage in a market environment.
    Sioshansi R
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Dec; 45(24):10728-35. PubMed ID: 22044253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing health benefits of controlling air pollution from power generation: the case of a lignite-fired power plant in Thailand.
    Thanh BD; Lefevre T
    Environ Manage; 2001 Feb; 27(2):303-17. PubMed ID: 11116387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intake fractions of industrial air pollutants in China: estimation and application.
    Wang S; Hao J; Ho MS; Li J; Lu Y
    Sci Total Environ; 2006 Feb; 354(2-3):127-41. PubMed ID: 16398989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Decadal emission estimates of carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and nitric oxide emissions from coal burning in electric power generation plants in India.
    Mittal ML; Sharma C; Singh R
    Environ Monit Assess; 2014 Oct; 186(10):6857-66. PubMed ID: 25004854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Costs for integrating wind into the future ERCOT system with related costs for savings in CO2 emissions.
    Lu X; McElroy MB; Sluzas NA
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Apr; 45(7):3160-6. PubMed ID: 21375280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.