These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis with severe varus deformity. Ünkar EA; Öztürkmen Y; Şükür E; Çarkçı E; Mert M Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2017 Mar; 51(2):95-99. PubMed ID: 28108167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Anteroposterior translation and range of motion after total knee arthroplasty using posterior cruciate ligament-retaining versus posterior cruciate ligament-substituting prostheses. Ishii Y; Noguchi H; Sato J; Sakurai T; Toyabe SI Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2017 Nov; 25(11):3536-3542. PubMed ID: 27485124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Functional outcome and range of motion of high-flexion posterior cruciate-retaining and high-flexion posterior cruciate-substituting total knee prostheses. A prospective, randomized study. Kim YH; Choi Y; Kwon OR; Kim JS J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Apr; 91(4):753-60. PubMed ID: 19339558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical outcome of total knee arthroplasty with medial pivot prosthesis a comparative study between the cruciate retaining and sacrificing. Bae DK; Song SJ; Cho SD J Arthroplasty; 2011 Aug; 26(5):693-8. PubMed ID: 20637557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Posterior slope of the tibial implant and the outcome of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Hernigou P; Deschamps G J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Mar; 86(3):506-11. PubMed ID: 14996875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Knee range of motion during the first two years after use of posterior cruciate-stabilizing or posterior cruciate-retaining total knee prostheses. A randomized clinical trial. Chaudhary R; Beaupré LA; Johnston DW J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Dec; 90(12):2579-86. PubMed ID: 19047702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Distinctions of introarticular force distribution between genesis-II posterior stabilized and cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty: An intraoperative comparative study of 45 patients. Tang H; Chen H; Yang D; Jiang Y; Zhang C; Zhou Y Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2017 Feb; 42():1-8. PubMed ID: 28042976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Posterior cruciate-substituting total knee replacement recovers the flexion arc faster in the early postoperative period in knees with high varus deformity: a prospective randomized study. Öztürk A; Akalın Y; Çevik N; Otuzbir A; Özkan Y; Dostabakan Y Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2016 Jul; 136(7):999-1006. PubMed ID: 27271754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical and radiological results of cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty with the NexGen®-CR system: comparison of patellar resurfacing versus retention with more than 14 years of follow-up. Chun KC; Lee SH; Baik JS; Kook SH; Han JK; Chun CH J Orthop Surg Res; 2017 Oct; 12(1):144. PubMed ID: 28969683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Retention versus sacrifice of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty for treating osteoarthritis. Verra WC; van den Boom LG; Jacobs W; Clement DJ; Wymenga AA; Nelissen RG Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Oct; 2013(10):CD004803. PubMed ID: 24114343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. 12-Year clinical and radiological results of a double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Kersten RFMR; de Vries AJ; van Raaij JJAM; Brouwer RW Knee; 2023 Dec; 45():110-116. PubMed ID: 37925801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Functional comparison of posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Maruyama S; Yoshiya S; Matsui N; Kuroda R; Kurosaka M J Arthroplasty; 2004 Apr; 19(3):349-53. PubMed ID: 15067650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correlation between preoperative and postoperative knee kinematics in total knee arthroplasty using cruciate retaining designs. Seon JK; Park JK; Jeong MS; Jung WB; Park KS; Yoon TR; Song EK Int Orthop; 2011 Apr; 35(4):515-20. PubMed ID: 20431881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Total knee arthroplasty using ultra-congruent inserts can provide similar stability and function compared with cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. Song EK; Lim HA; Joo SD; Kim SK; Lee KB; Seon JK Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2017 Nov; 25(11):3530-3535. PubMed ID: 28439638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of the posterior cruciate ligament and component design on joint line position after primary total knee arthroplasty. Snider MG; Macdonald SJ J Arthroplasty; 2009 Oct; 24(7):1093-8. PubMed ID: 19027265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of a standard and a gender-specific posterior cruciate-substituting high-flexion knee prosthesis: a prospective, randomized, short-term outcome study. Kim YH; Choi Y; Kim JS J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Aug; 92(10):1911-20. PubMed ID: 20720134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Posterior Cruciate-Retaining and High-Flexion Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty Design. Lee WG; Song EK; Choi SW; Jin QH; Seon JK J Arthroplasty; 2020 Mar; 35(3):752-755. PubMed ID: 31676176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]