These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15995481)

  • 41. Trauma outcome analysis of two Canadian centres using the TRISS method.
    Guirguis EM; Hong C; Liu D; Watters JM; Baillie F; McIntyre RW
    J Trauma; 1990 Apr; 30(4):426-9. PubMed ID: 2325173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Summary of the discussion: trauma registry data and TRISS evidence.
    Pollock DA
    J Trauma; 1999 Sep; 47(3 Suppl):S56-8. PubMed ID: 10496612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Different definitions of patient outcome: consequences for performance analysis in trauma.
    Skaga NO; Eken T; Jones JM; Steen PA
    Injury; 2008 May; 39(5):612-22. PubMed ID: 18377909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Comparison of modified Kampala trauma score with trauma mortality prediction model and trauma-injury severity score: A National Trauma Data Bank Study.
    Akay S; Ozturk AM; Akay H
    Am J Emerg Med; 2017 Aug; 35(8):1056-1059. PubMed ID: 28222915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. New Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) adjustments for survival prediction.
    Domingues CA; Coimbra R; Poggetti RS; Nogueira LS; de Sousa RMC
    World J Emerg Surg; 2018; 13():12. PubMed ID: 29541155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparison of the trauma and injury severity score and modified early warning score with rapid lactate level (the ViEWS-L score) in blunt trauma patients.
    Jo S; Lee JB; Jin YH; Jeong T; Yoon J; Choi SJ; Park B
    Eur J Emerg Med; 2014 Jun; 21(3):199-205. PubMed ID: 23628928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Applicability of the predictors of the historical trauma score in the present Dutch trauma population: modelling the TRISS predictors.
    Gunning AC; Leenen LP
    J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2014 Oct; 77(4):614-9. PubMed ID: 25250603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Is 24-hour operating room staff absolutely necessary for level II trauma center designation?
    Barone JE; Ryan MC; Cayten CG; Murphy JG
    J Trauma; 1993 Jun; 34(6):878-82; discussion 882-3. PubMed ID: 8315684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Unification of the revised trauma score.
    Moore L; Lavoie A; Abdous B; Le Sage N; Liberman M; Bergeron E; Emond M
    J Trauma; 2006 Sep; 61(3):718-22; discussion 722. PubMed ID: 16967013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Limitations of the TRISS method for interhospital comparisons: a multihospital study.
    Cayten CG; Stahl WM; Murphy JG; Agarwal N; Byrne DW
    J Trauma; 1991 Apr; 31(4):471-81; discussion 481-2. PubMed ID: 2020032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Summary of the discussion: what have we learned about population-based investigations?
    Hedges JR
    J Trauma; 1999 Sep; 47(3 Suppl):S67-8. PubMed ID: 10496614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Primary verification: is the TRISS appropriate for Thailand?
    Podang J; Singhasivanon P; Podhipak A; Santikarn C; Sarol JN; Ancheta CA
    Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 2004 Mar; 35(1):188-94. PubMed ID: 15272768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Systematic review of trauma system effectiveness based on registry comparisons.
    Jurkovich GJ; Mock C
    J Trauma; 1999 Sep; 47(3 Suppl):S46-55. PubMed ID: 10496611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Should Level I trauma centers be rated NC-17?
    Sherman HF; Landry VL; Jones LM
    J Trauma; 2001 May; 50(5):784-91. PubMed ID: 11371833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. TRISS methodology in trauma: the need for alternatives.
    Demetriades D; Chan LS; Velmahos G; Berne TV; Cornwell EE; Belzberg H; Asensio JA; Murray J; Berne J; Shoemaker W
    Br J Surg; 1998 Mar; 85(3):379-84. PubMed ID: 9529498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The trauma risk adjustment model: a new model for evaluating trauma care.
    Moore L; Lavoie A; Turgeon AF; Abdous B; Le Sage N; Emond M; Liberman M; Bergeron E
    Ann Surg; 2009 Jun; 249(6):1040-6. PubMed ID: 19474674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A comparison of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score and the Trauma-Injury Severity Score (TRISS) for outcome assessment in intensive care unit trauma patients.
    Wong DT; Barrow PM; Gomez M; McGuire GP
    Crit Care Med; 1996 Oct; 24(10):1642-8. PubMed ID: 8874299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Pediatric coefficients for TRISS analysis.
    Eichelberger MR; Champion HR; Sacco WJ; Gotschall CS; Copes WS; Bowman LM
    J Trauma; 1993 Mar; 34(3):319-22. PubMed ID: 8483167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A new approach to outcome prediction in trauma: A comparison with the TRISS model.
    Bouamra O; Wrotchford A; Hollis S; Vail A; Woodford M; Lecky F
    J Trauma; 2006 Sep; 61(3):701-10. PubMed ID: 16967011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A simple mathematical modification of TRISS markedly improves calibration.
    Osler TM; Rogers FB; Badger GJ; Healey M; Vane DW; Shackford SR
    J Trauma; 2002 Oct; 53(4):630-4. PubMed ID: 12394858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.