154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15995626)
1. Radiation-induced DNA-damage and gene expression profiles in human lung cancer cells with different radiosensitivity.
Hellman B; Brodin D; Andersson M; Dahlman-Wright K; Isacsson U; Brattstrom D; Bergqvist M
Exp Oncol; 2005 Jun; 27(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 15995626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Less initial rejoining of X-ray-induced DNA double-strand breaks in cells of a small cell (U-1285) compared to a large cell (U-1810) lung carcinoma cell line.
Cedervall B; Sirzea F; Brodin O; Lewensohn R
Radiat Res; 1994 Jul; 139(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 8016305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Relationship between cellular radiosensitivity and DNA damage measured by comet assay in human normal, NBS and AT fibroblasts.
Brammer I; Zoller M; Dikomey E
Int J Radiat Biol; 2001 Sep; 77(9):929-38. PubMed ID: 11576452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiosensitivity, apoptosis and repair of DNA double-strand breaks in radiation-sensitive Chinese hamster ovary cell mutants treated at different dose rates.
Hu Q; Hill RP
Radiat Res; 1996 Dec; 146(6):636-45. PubMed ID: 8955713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Induction and rejoining of DNA double-strand breaks in human cervix carcinoma cell lines of differing radiosensitivity.
Kelland LR; Edwards SM; Steel GG
Radiat Res; 1988 Dec; 116(3):526-38. PubMed ID: 3205912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Identification of differential gene expression profiles of radioresistant lung cancer cell line established by fractionated ionizing radiation in vitro.
Xu QY; Gao Y; Liu Y; Yang WZ; Xu XY
Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Sep; 121(18):1830-7. PubMed ID: 19080366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Radiosensitivity detected by "comet" assay in two human tumor cell lines].
Gao YH; Yang WZ; Yan J; Yuan ZY; Liu XF; Xu GZ
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2004 Apr; 26(4):217-9. PubMed ID: 15312383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. HIV-1 Tat depresses DNA-PK(CS) expression and DNA repair, and sensitizes cells to ionizing radiation.
Sun Y; Huang YC; Xu QZ; Wang HP; Bai B; Sui JL; Zhou PK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jul; 65(3):842-50. PubMed ID: 16751065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison between pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and the comet assay as predictive assays for radiosensitivity in fibroblasts.
Sarkaria JN; Bush C; Eady JJ; Peacock JH; Steel GG; Yarnold JR
Radiat Res; 1998 Jul; 150(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 9650597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of motexafin gadolinium on DNA damage and X-ray-induced DNA damage repair, as assessed by the Comet assay.
Donnelly ET; Liu Y; Paul TK; Rockwell S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jul; 62(4):1176-86. PubMed ID: 15990023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The potential value of the neutral comet assay and the expression of genes associated with DNA damage in assessing the radiosensitivity of tumor cells.
Jayakumar S; Bhilwade HN; Pandey BN; Sandur SK; Chaubey RC
Mutat Res; 2012 Oct; 748(1-2):52-9. PubMed ID: 22790088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiation-induced effects on telomerase in gynecological cancer cell lines with different radiosensitivity and repair capacity.
Kurvinen K; Rantanen V; Syrjänen S; Johansson B
Int J Radiat Biol; 2006 Dec; 82(12):859-67. PubMed ID: 17178626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differences in repair of radiation induced damage in two human tumor cell lines as measured by cell survival and alkaline DNA unwinding.
Schwachöfer JH; Crooijmans RP; Hoogenhout H; Kal HB; Schaapveld RQ; Wessels J
Strahlenther Onkol; 1991 Jan; 167(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 1992541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radiosensitivity of cervical cancer cell lines: the impact of polymorphisms in DNA repair genes.
Gurská S; Farkasová T; Gábelová A
Neoplasma; 2007; 54(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 17447849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lack of a correlation between radiosensitivity and DNA double-strand break induction or rejoining in six human tumor cell lines.
Olive PL; Banáth JP; MacPhail HS
Cancer Res; 1994 Jul; 54(14):3939-46. PubMed ID: 8033118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Explaining differences in sensitivity to killing by ionizing radiation between human lymphoid cell lines.
Aldridge DR; Radford IR
Cancer Res; 1998 Jul; 58(13):2817-24. PubMed ID: 9661896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The frequency of micronuclei in lung cancer cell lines and their correlation to intrinsic radiation sensitivity.
Bergqvist AS; Brattström D; Bergqvist M; Brodin O; Wagenius G; Zetterberg LA
Anticancer Res; 2001; 21(6A):3853-6. PubMed ID: 11911257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radiation inactivation of human prostate cancer cells: the role of apoptosis.
Algan O; Stobbe CC; Helt AM; Hanks GE; Chapman JD
Radiat Res; 1996 Sep; 146(3):267-75. PubMed ID: 8752304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Lymphoblastoid cell lines differing in p53 status show clear differences in basal gene expression with minor changes after irradiation.
Zschenker O; Borgmann K; Streichert T; Meier I; Wrona A; Dikomey E
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Aug; 80(2):236-49. PubMed ID: 16905214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Differential repair of radiation-induced DNA damage in cells of human squamous cell carcinoma and the effect of caffeine and cysteamine on induction and repair of DNA double-strand breaks.
Smeets MF; Mooren EH; Abdel-Wahab AH; Bartelink H; Begg AC
Radiat Res; 1994 Nov; 140(2):153-60. PubMed ID: 7938462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
