These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15996561)

  • 1. How do speakers avoid ambiguous linguistic expressions?
    Ferreira VS; Slevc LR; Rogers ES
    Cognition; 2005 Jul; 96(3):263-84. PubMed ID: 15996561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do speakers avoid ambiguities during dialogue?
    Haywood SL; Pickering MJ; Branigan HP
    Psychol Sci; 2005 May; 16(5):362-6. PubMed ID: 15869694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Syntactic alignment and participant role in dialogue.
    Branigan HP; Pickering MJ; McLean JF; Cleland AA
    Cognition; 2007 Aug; 104(2):163-97. PubMed ID: 16876778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Avoiding gender ambiguous pronouns in French.
    Fukumura K; Pozniak C; Alario FX
    Cognition; 2022 Jan; 218():104909. PubMed ID: 34649089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prosodic disambiguation of syntactic structure: for the speaker or for the addressee?
    Kraljic T; Brennan SE
    Cogn Psychol; 2005 Mar; 50(2):194-231. PubMed ID: 15680144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preschoolers' sensitivity to referential ambiguity: evidence for a dissociation between implicit understanding and explicit behavior.
    Nilsen ES; Graham SA; Smith S; Chambers CG
    Dev Sci; 2008 Jul; 11(4):556-62. PubMed ID: 18576963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Morphophonological influences on the comprehension of subject-verb agreement: an ERP study.
    Severens E; Jansma BM; Hartsuiker RJ
    Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1228():135-44. PubMed ID: 18634765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How speakers interrupt themselves in managing problems in speaking: evidence from self-repairs.
    Seyfeddinipur M; Kita S; Indefrey P
    Cognition; 2008 Sep; 108(3):837-42. PubMed ID: 18589407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The use of visual context during the production of referring expressions.
    Fukumura K; van Gompel RP; Pickering MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Sep; 63(9):1700-15. PubMed ID: 20127548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The production of Turkish relative clauses in agrammatism: Verb inflection and constituent order.
    Duman TY; Aygen G; Bastiaanse R
    Brain Lang; 2008 Jun; 105(3):149-60. PubMed ID: 18076978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Give and take: syntactic priming during spoken language comprehension.
    Thothathiri M; Snedeker J
    Cognition; 2008 Jul; 108(1):51-68. PubMed ID: 18258226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. You said it before and you'll say it again: expectations of consistency in communication.
    Shintel H; Keysar B
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):357-69. PubMed ID: 17352617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Infants' use of shared linguistic information to clarify ambiguous requests.
    Ganea PA; Saylor MM
    Child Dev; 2007; 78(2):493-502. PubMed ID: 17381786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigating linguistic relativity through bilingualism: the case of grammatical gender.
    Kousta ST; Vinson DP; Vigliocco G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jul; 34(4):843-58. PubMed ID: 18605873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual scenes trigger immediate syntactic reanalysis: evidence from ERPs during situated spoken comprehension.
    Knoeferle P; Habets B; Crocker MW; Münte TF
    Cereb Cortex; 2008 Apr; 18(4):789-95. PubMed ID: 17644830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gender affects semantic competition: the effect of gender in a non-gender-marking language.
    Fukumura K; Hyönä J; Scholfield M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1012-21. PubMed ID: 23356244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Persistent structural priming from language comprehension to language production.
    Bock K; Dell GS; Chang F; Onishi KH
    Cognition; 2007 Sep; 104(3):437-58. PubMed ID: 16973143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Eye movements and lexical ambiguity resolution: investigating the subordinate-bias effect.
    Sereno SC; O'Donnell PJ; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):335-50. PubMed ID: 16634674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Communicative Context Affects Use of Referential Prosody.
    Tzeng CY; Namy LL; Nygaard LC
    Cogn Sci; 2019 Nov; 43(11):e12799. PubMed ID: 31742754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Language, thought, and real nouns.
    Barner D; Inagaki S; Li P
    Cognition; 2009 Jun; 111(3):329-44. PubMed ID: 19345937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.