These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15996897)

  • 1. Optimizing principal components analysis of event-related potentials: matrix type, factor loading weighting, extraction, and rotations.
    Dien J; Beal DJ; Berg P
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Aug; 116(8):1808-25. PubMed ID: 15996897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating two-step PCA of ERP data with Geomin, Infomax, Oblimin, Promax, and Varimax rotations.
    Dien J
    Psychophysiology; 2010 Jan; 47(1):170-83. PubMed ID: 19761521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Principal components analysis of Laplacian waveforms as a generic method for identifying ERP generator patterns: II. Adequacy of low-density estimates.
    Kayser J; Tenke CE
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Feb; 117(2):369-80. PubMed ID: 16356768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recovering Wood and McCarthy's ERP-prototypes by means of ERP-specific procrustes-rotation.
    Beauducel A
    J Neurosci Methods; 2018 Feb; 295():20-36. PubMed ID: 29175590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Controlling for experimental effects in event-related potentials by means of principal component rotation.
    Beauducel A; Leue A
    J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Jan; 239():139-47. PubMed ID: 25455342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Principal components analysis of Laplacian waveforms as a generic method for identifying ERP generator patterns: I. Evaluation with auditory oddball tasks.
    Kayser J; Tenke CE
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Feb; 117(2):348-68. PubMed ID: 16356767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Decomposing ERP time-frequency energy using PCA.
    Bernat EM; Williams WJ; Gehring WJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1314-34. PubMed ID: 15978494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recovering dipole sources from scalp-recorded event-related-potentials using component analysis: principal component analysis and independent component analysis.
    Richards JE
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2004 Nov; 54(3):201-20. PubMed ID: 15331212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Principal component analysis of event-related potentials: simulation studies demonstrate misallocation of variance across components.
    Wood CC; McCarthy G
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1984 Jun; 59(3):249-60. PubMed ID: 6203715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Principles behind variance misallocation in temporal exploratory factor analysis for ERP data: Insights from an inter-factor covariance decomposition.
    Scharf F; Nestler S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Jun; 128():119-136. PubMed ID: 29621554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Applying principal components analysis to event-related potentials: a tutorial.
    Dien J
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2012; 37(6):497-517. PubMed ID: 22889342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimizing PCA methodology for ERP component identification and measurement: theoretical rationale and empirical evaluation.
    Kayser J; Tenke CE
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2003 Dec; 114(12):2307-25. PubMed ID: 14652090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The ERP PCA Toolkit: an open source program for advanced statistical analysis of event-related potential data.
    Dien J
    J Neurosci Methods; 2010 Mar; 187(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 20035787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Parallel Factor Analysis as an exploratory tool for wavelet transformed event-related EEG.
    Mørup M; Hansen LK; Herrmann CS; Parnas J; Arnfred SM
    Neuroimage; 2006 Feb; 29(3):938-47. PubMed ID: 16185898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Abnormal flash visual evoked potentials in malnourished infants: an evaluation using principal component analysis.
    McDonald CG; Joffe CL; Barnet AB; Flinn JM
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Apr; 118(4):896-900. PubMed ID: 17317298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of PCA and ICA of simulated ERPs: Promax vs. Infomax rotations.
    Dien J; Khoe W; Mangun GR
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2007 Aug; 28(8):742-63. PubMed ID: 17133395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interpretation of ANOVA models for microarray data using PCA.
    de Haan JR; Wehrens R; Bauerschmidt S; Piek E; van Schaik RC; Buydens LM
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Jan; 23(2):184-90. PubMed ID: 17105717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improving the detection of significant factors using ANOVA-PCA by selective reduction of residual variability.
    Climaco-Pinto R; Barros AS; Locquet N; Schmidtke L; Rutledge DN
    Anal Chim Acta; 2009 Oct; 653(2):131-42. PubMed ID: 19808105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Misallocation of variance in event-related potentials: simulation studies on the effects of test power, topography, and baseline-to-peak versus principal component quantifications.
    Beauducel A; Debener S
    J Neurosci Methods; 2003 Mar; 124(1):103-12. PubMed ID: 12648769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Principal component analysis of event-related potentials: a note on misallocation of variance.
    Möcks J; Verleger R
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1986 Sep; 65(5):393-8. PubMed ID: 2427330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.