These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15997027)

  • 1. Kappa statistic.
    Allan GM
    CMAJ; 2005 Jul; 173(1):16-7; author reply 17. PubMed ID: 15997027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Kappa statistic.
    Juurlink DN; Detsky AS
    CMAJ; 2005 Jul; 173(1):16; author reply 17. PubMed ID: 15997028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Kappa statistic.
    Carpenter CR
    CMAJ; 2005 Jul; 173(1):15-6; author reply 17. PubMed ID: 15997024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tips for learners of evidence-based medicine: 3. Measures of observer variability (kappa statistic).
    McGinn T; Wyer PC; Newman TB; Keitz S; Leipzig R; For GG;
    CMAJ; 2004 Nov; 171(11):1369-73. PubMed ID: 15557592
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Understanding the error of our ways: mapping the concepts of validity and reliability.
    Higgins PA; Straub AJ
    Nurs Outlook; 2006; 54(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 16487776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The concordance test between two experts].
    Dupuy A; Guillaume JC
    Ann Dermatol Venereol; 2003 May; 130(5):570. PubMed ID: 12843842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interrater reliability and the kappa statistic: a comment on Morris et al. (2008).
    Kottner J
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Jan; 46(1):140-1. PubMed ID: 18485349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fourth and forty?
    Huang G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Aug; 134(2):174-5. PubMed ID: 18675190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence-based medicine (EBM) in practice: agreement between observers rating esophageal varices: how to cope with chance?
    Sierra F; Cárdenas A
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Nov; 102(11):2363-6. PubMed ID: 17958753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rating scales, scales of measurement, issues of reliability: resolving some critical issues for clinicians and researchers.
    Cicchetti D; Bronen R; Spencer S; Haut S; Berg A; Oliver P; Tyrer P
    J Nerv Ment Dis; 2006 Aug; 194(8):557-64. PubMed ID: 16909062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Importance of scientific research design to improve the quality of clinical study].
    Wang J
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1999 Apr; 34(4):197-8. PubMed ID: 11326913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations.
    Polit DF; Beck CT; Owen SV
    Res Nurs Health; 2007 Aug; 30(4):459-67. PubMed ID: 17654487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Grading the evidence: levels of evidence and grades of recommendation.
    Petrisor BA; Keating J; Schemitsch E
    Injury; 2006 Apr; 37(4):321-7. PubMed ID: 16488417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interrater reliability in assessing quality of diagnostic accuracy studies using the QUADAS tool. A preliminary assessment.
    Hollingworth W; Medina LS; Lenkinski RE; Shibata DK; Bernal B; Zurakowski D; Comstock B; Jarvik JG
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Jul; 13(7):803-10. PubMed ID: 16777553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A review of five cardiology journals found that observer variability of measured variables was infrequently reported.
    Gow RM; Barrowman NJ; Lai L; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 61(4):394-401. PubMed ID: 18313565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Midwives' visual interpretation of intrapartum cardiotocographs: intra- and inter-observer agreement.
    Devane D; Lalor J
    J Adv Nurs; 2005 Oct; 52(2):133-41. PubMed ID: 16164474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Researcher bias and generalization of results in bias and limits of agreement analyses: a commentary based on the review of 50 Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica papers using the Altman-Bland approach.
    Berthelsen PG; Nilsson LB
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2006 Oct; 50(9):1111-3. PubMed ID: 16987340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Critical appraisal for emergency medicine: 1. Concepts and definitions.
    Goodacre S
    Emerg Med J; 2008 Apr; 25(4):219-21. PubMed ID: 18356354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Statistical significance, power and sample size - what does it all mean?
    Christley RM
    J Small Anim Pract; 2008 Jun; 49(6):263. PubMed ID: 18510495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.