These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15997367)

  • 1. Cost analysis of procedures related to the management of renal artery stenosis from various perspectives.
    van Helvoort-Postulart D; Dirksen CD; Kroon AA; Nelemans PJ; de Leeuw PW; Kessels AG; van Engelshoven JM; Myriam Hunink MG
    Eur Radiol; 2006 Jan; 16(1):154-60. PubMed ID: 15997367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Renal artery stenosis: cost-effectiveness of diagnosis and treatment.
    van Helvoort-Postulart D; Dirksen CD; Nelemans PJ; Kroon AA; Kessels AG; de Leeuw PW; Vasbinder GB; van Engelshoven JM; Hunink MG
    Radiology; 2007 Aug; 244(2):505-13. PubMed ID: 17581886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of computed tomographic angiography and magnetic resonance angiography for diagnosing renal artery stenosis.
    Vasbinder GB; Nelemans PJ; Kessels AG; Kroon AA; Maki JH; Leiner T; Beek FJ; Korst MB; Flobbe K; de Haan MW; van Zwam WH; Postma CT; Hunink MG; de Leeuw PW; van Engelshoven JM;
    Ann Intern Med; 2004 Nov; 141(9):674-82; discussion 682. PubMed ID: 15520423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Imaging modalities for renal artery stenosis in suspected renovascular hypertension: prospective intraindividual comparison of color Doppler US, CT angiography, GD-enhanced MR angiography, and digital substraction angiography.
    Rountas C; Vlychou M; Vassiou K; Liakopoulos V; Kapsalaki E; Koukoulis G; Fezoulidis IV; Stefanidis I
    Ren Fail; 2007; 29(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 17497443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Costs in follow-up of endovascularly repaired abdominal aortic aneurysms. Magnetic resonance imaging with MR angiography versus EUROSTAR protocols.
    Engellau L; Albrechtsson U; Höjgård S; Norgren L; Larsson EM
    Int Angiol; 2003 Mar; 22(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 12771854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. MR angiography versus intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography of the lower extremities: activity-based cost analysis.
    Stacul F; Pozzi-Mucelli F; Lubin E; Gava S; Cuttin-Zernich R; Grisi G; Cova MA
    Radiol Med; 2006 Feb; 111(1):73-84. PubMed ID: 16623307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography vs intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography for carotid imaging: activity-based cost analysis.
    U-King-Im JM; Hollingworth W; Trivedi RA; Cross JJ; Higgins NJ; Graves MJ; Kirkpatrick PJ; Antoun NM; Gillard JH
    Eur Radiol; 2004 Apr; 14(4):730-5. PubMed ID: 14618366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced computed tomographic angiography and gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for the assessment of hemodynamically significant transplant renal artery stenosis.
    Gaddikeri S; Mitsumori L; Vaidya S; Hippe DS; Bhargava P; Dighe MK
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2014; 43(4):162-8. PubMed ID: 24948209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. CT angiography of the abdominal arteries.
    Prokop M
    Abdom Imaging; 1998; 23(5):462-8. PubMed ID: 9841059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The cost-effectiveness of the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis.
    Nelemans PJ; Kessels AG; De Leeuw P; De Haan M; van Engelshoven J
    Eur J Radiol; 1998 May; 27(2):95-107. PubMed ID: 9639134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of non-breath-hold high resolution gadolinium-enhanced MRA with digital subtraction angiography in the evaluation on allograft renal artery stenosis.
    Chan YL; Leung CB; Yu SC; Yeung DK; Li PK
    Clin Radiol; 2001 Feb; 56(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 11222071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. DSA versus multi-detector row CT angiography in peripheral arterial disease: randomized controlled trial.
    Kock MC; Adriaensen ME; Pattynama PM; van Sambeek MR; van Urk H; Stijnen T; Hunink MG
    Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):727-37. PubMed ID: 16244280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The costs and effects of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and digital substraction angiography on quality of life in patients with peripheral arterial disease.
    Bosma J; Dijksman LM; Lam K; Wisselink W; van Swijndregt AD; Vahl A
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Apr; 55(3):279-86. PubMed ID: 23939383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating patients with renal failure for renal artery stenosis with gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography.
    Ghantous VE; Eisen TD; Sherman AH; Finkelstein FO
    Am J Kidney Dis; 1999 Jan; 33(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 9915265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An international multicenter comparison of time-SLIP unenhanced MR angiography and contrast-enhanced CT angiography for assessing renal artery stenosis: the renal artery contrast-free trial.
    Albert TS; Akahane M; Parienty I; Yellin N; Catalá V; Alomar X; Prot A; Tomizawa N; Xue H; Katabathina VS; Lopera JE; Jin Z
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jan; 204(1):182-8. PubMed ID: 25539255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Non-invasive imaging cannot replace formal angiography in the diagnosis of renovascular hypertension.
    Trautmann A; Roebuck DJ; McLaren CA; Brennan E; Marks SD; Tullus K
    Pediatr Nephrol; 2017 Mar; 32(3):495-502. PubMed ID: 27747454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison between willingness to pay and willingness to give up time.
    van Helvoort-Postulart D; Dirksen CD; Kessels AG; van Engelshoven JM; Myriam Hunink MG
    Eur J Health Econ; 2009 Feb; 10(1):81-91. PubMed ID: 18437436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Noninvasive investigation for renal artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and color Doppler sonography as compared to digital subtraction angiography.
    Voiculescu A; Hofer M; Hetzel GR; Malms J; Mödder U; Grabensee B; Hollenbeck M
    Clin Exp Hypertens; 2001 Oct; 23(7):521-31. PubMed ID: 11710754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimally invasive diagnosis of renal artery stenosis by spiral computed tomography angiography.
    Olbricht CJ; Paul K; Prokop M; Chavan A; Schaefer-Prokop CM; Jandeleit K; Koch KM; Galanski M
    Kidney Int; 1995 Oct; 48(4):1332-7. PubMed ID: 8569096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost impact of diagnostic imaging for lower extremity peripheral vascular occlusive disease.
    Hay JW; Lawler E; Yucel K; Guo A; Balzer T; Gaziano JM; Scranton RE
    Value Health; 2009; 12(2):262-6. PubMed ID: 18657093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.