These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15998176)

  • 1. Use of the extreme groups approach: a critical reexamination and new recommendations.
    Preacher KJ; Rucker DD; MacCallum RC; Nicewander WA
    Psychol Methods; 2005 Jun; 10(2):178-92. PubMed ID: 15998176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing groups in a before-after design: when t test and ANCOVA produce different results.
    Wright DB
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2006 Sep; 76(Pt 3):663-75. PubMed ID: 16953968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A generally robust approach for testing hypotheses and setting confidence intervals for effect sizes.
    Keselman HJ; Algina J; Lix LM; Wilcox RR; Deering KN
    Psychol Methods; 2008 Jun; 13(2):110-29. PubMed ID: 18557681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations.
    Shrout PE; Bolger N
    Psychol Methods; 2002 Dec; 7(4):422-45. PubMed ID: 12530702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The multilevel latent covariate model: a new, more reliable approach to group-level effects in contextual studies.
    Lüdtke O; Marsh HW; Robitzsch A; Trautwein U; Asparouhov T; Muthén B
    Psychol Methods; 2008 Sep; 13(3):203-29. PubMed ID: 18778152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The importance of distinguishing between constructs and methods when comparing predictors in personnel selection research and practice.
    Arthur W; Villado AJ
    J Appl Psychol; 2008 Mar; 93(2):435-42. PubMed ID: 18361642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Obtaining representative nominal groups.
    Kelley MR; Wright DB
    Behav Res Methods; 2010 Feb; 42(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 20160284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The statistical analysis of data from small groups.
    Kenny DA; Mannetti L; Pierro A; Livi S; Kashy DA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2002 Jul; 83(1):126-37. PubMed ID: 12088122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The integration of continuous and discrete latent variable models: potential problems and promising opportunities.
    Bauer DJ; Curran PJ
    Psychol Methods; 2004 Mar; 9(1):3-29. PubMed ID: 15053717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of study duration, frequency of observation, and sample size on power in studies of group differences in polynomial change.
    Raudenbush SW; Xiao-Feng L
    Psychol Methods; 2001 Dec; 6(4):387-401. PubMed ID: 11778679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Determining the statistical significance of relative weights.
    Tonidandel S; Lebreton JM; Johnson JW
    Psychol Methods; 2009 Dec; 14(4):387-99. PubMed ID: 19968399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using effect sizes for research reporting: examples using item response theory to analyze differential item functioning.
    Steinberg L; Thissen D
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Dec; 11(4):402-15. PubMed ID: 17154754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the power of multivariate latent growth curve models to detect correlated change.
    Hertzog C; Lindenberger U; Ghisletta P; Oertzen Tv
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Sep; 11(3):244-52. PubMed ID: 16953703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adaptive robust estimation and testing.
    Keselman HJ; Wilcox RR; Lix LM; Algina J; Fradette K
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 Nov; 60(Pt 2):267-93. PubMed ID: 17971270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sample size planning for statistical power and accuracy in parameter estimation.
    Maxwell SE; Kelley K; Rausch JR
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2008; 59():537-63. PubMed ID: 17937603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The moderator effect that wasn't there: statistical problems in ambivalence research.
    Ullrich J; Schermelleh-Engel K; Böttcher B
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Oct; 95(4):774-94. PubMed ID: 18808259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The true-change model with individual method effects: reliability issues.
    Vautier S; Steyer R; Boomsma A
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 Nov; 61(Pt 2):379-99. PubMed ID: 17535486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Structural equation modeling of multitrait-multimethod data: different models for different types of methods.
    Eid M; Nussbeck FW; Geiser C; Cole DA; Gollwitzer M; Lischetzke T
    Psychol Methods; 2008 Sep; 13(3):230-53. PubMed ID: 18778153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predicting group-level outcome variables from variables measured at the individual level: a latent variable multilevel model.
    Croon MA; van Veldhoven MJ
    Psychol Methods; 2007 Mar; 12(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 17402811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Determining the most unfavourable variance to calculate the Measurement Scale Imprecision Factor, and extension to other types of sampling methods].
    Martínez García JA; Martínez Caro L
    Psicothema; 2008 May; 20(2):311-6. PubMed ID: 18413096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.