BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15998206)

  • 1. Discrimination of multidimensional visual stimuli by mice: intra- and extradimensional shifts.
    Brigman JL; Bussey TJ; Saksida LM; Rothblat LA
    Behav Neurosci; 2005 Jun; 119(3):839-42. PubMed ID: 15998206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stimulus specific deficit on visual reversal learning after lesions of medial prefrontal cortex in the mouse.
    Brigman JL; Rothblat LA
    Behav Brain Res; 2008 Mar; 187(2):405-10. PubMed ID: 18022704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attentional changes during discrimination learning by retarded children.
    Singh NN; Beale IL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1978 May; 29(3):527-33. PubMed ID: 670856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance of C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice on a touchscreen-based attentional set-shifting task.
    Dickson PE; Calton MA; Mittleman G
    Behav Brain Res; 2014 Mar; 261():158-70. PubMed ID: 24361287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intermodal transfer from a visual to an auditory discrimination using an errorless learning procedure.
    Arantes J; Berg ME
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):303-8. PubMed ID: 19429224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The ultimate intra-/extra-dimensional attentional set-shifting task for mice.
    Scheggia D; Bebensee A; Weinberger DR; Papaleo F
    Biol Psychiatry; 2014 Apr; 75(8):660-70. PubMed ID: 23810621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Animal neuropsychology: validation of the Intra-Dimensional Extra-Dimensional set shifting task for mice.
    Garner JP; Thogerson CM; Würbel H; Murray JD; Mench JA
    Behav Brain Res; 2006 Oct; 173(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 16842867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Auditory--visual cross-modal perception of communicative stimuli in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).
    Evans TA; Howell S; Westergaard GC
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Oct; 31(4):399-406. PubMed ID: 16248726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implicit learning in a serial choice visual discrimination task in the operant 9-hole box by intact and striatal lesioned mice.
    Trueman RC; Brooks SP; Dunnett SB
    Behav Brain Res; 2005 Apr; 159(2):313-22. PubMed ID: 15817194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intradimensional and extradimensional shifts in spatial learning.
    Trobalon JB; Miguelez D; McLaren IP; Mackintosh NJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2003 Apr; 29(2):143-52. PubMed ID: 12735278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differential effects of inactivation of the orbitofrontal cortex on strategy set-shifting and reversal learning.
    Ghods-Sharifi S; Haluk DM; Floresco SB
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2008 May; 89(4):567-73. PubMed ID: 18054257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Categorization of visual stimuli in the honeybee Apis mellifera.
    Benard J; Stach S; Giurfa M
    Anim Cogn; 2006 Oct; 9(4):257-70. PubMed ID: 16909238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance of MA-matched nonretarded and retarded children on discrimination learning and transfer-shift tasks.
    Richman CL; Adams KA; Nida SA; Richman J
    Am J Ment Defic; 1978 Nov; 83(3):262-9. PubMed ID: 717439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contrasting cortical and subcortical activations produced by attentional-set shifting and reversal learning in humans.
    Rogers RD; Andrews TC; Grasby PM; Brooks DJ; Robbins TW
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2000 Jan; 12(1):142-62. PubMed ID: 10769312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prefrontal cortex lesions and scopolamine impair attention performance of C57BL/6 mice in a novel 2-choice visual discrimination task.
    Dillon GM; Shelton D; McKinney AP; Caniga M; Marcus JN; Ferguson MT; Kornecook TJ; Dodart JC
    Behav Brain Res; 2009 Dec; 204(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 19416740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Responses of pigeon (Columba livia) Wulst neurons during acquisition and reversal of a visual discrimination task.
    Bingman VP; Gasser B; Colombo M
    Behav Neurosci; 2008 Oct; 122(5):1139-47. PubMed ID: 18823169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stimulus control by same-versus-different relations among multiple visual stimuli.
    Wasserman EA; Frank AJ; Young ME
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2002 Oct; 28(4):347-57. PubMed ID: 12395492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inactivation of the medial prefrontal cortex of the rat impairs strategy set-shifting, but not reversal learning, using a novel, automated procedure.
    Floresco SB; Block AE; Tse MT
    Behav Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 190(1):85-96. PubMed ID: 18359099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Same-different discrimination: the keel and backbone of thought and reasoning.
    Wasserman EA; Young ME
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2010 Jan; 36(1):3-22. PubMed ID: 20141313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.