BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15998475)

  • 1. [Factors for expulsion of intrauterine device Tcu380A applied immediately postpartum and after a delayed period].
    Bonilla Rosales F; Aguilar Zamudio ME; Cázares Montero Mde L; Hernández Ortiz ME; Luna Ruiz MA
    Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc; 2005; 43(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 15998475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Current status of frameless anchored IUD for immediate intracesarean insertion.
    Wildemeersch D; Goldstuck ND; Hasskamp T
    Dev Period Med; 2016; 20(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 27416620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Use of modified intrauterine device (IUD) TCu 380 with chromium filaments in the immediate postpartum].
    Hernández Valencia M; Becerril Flores LC
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2000 Feb; 68():70-6. PubMed ID: 10774108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intrauterine device developments.
    Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1984; 5(4):4-6. PubMed ID: 12313225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Insertion technique, not design, affects expulsion rates of postpartum intrauterine device.
    Stumpf PG; Lenker RM
    Contraception; 1984 Oct; 30(4):327-30. PubMed ID: 6509985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Immediate postplacental insertion of a copper intrauterine device: a pilot study to evaluate expulsion rate by mode of delivery.
    Sucak A; Ozcan S; Çelen Ş; Çağlar T; Göksu G; Danışman N
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2015 Sep; 15():202. PubMed ID: 26330364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk factors for postpartum intrauterine device expulsion among women delivering at a tertiary Hospital in Uganda: a prospective cohort study.
    Muhumuza J; Migisha R; Ngonzi J; Kayondo M; Mugyenyi G
    Contracept Reprod Med; 2021 Mar; 6(1):7. PubMed ID: 33648587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. One-year follow up on post-placental IUD insertion: A randomized clinical trial.
    Marangoni M; Laporte M; Surita F; Kraft MB; Bahamondes L; Juliato CRT
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Apr; 100(4):596-603. PubMed ID: 33421091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Postplacental insertion of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device after cesarean delivery vs. delayed insertion: a randomized controlled trial.
    Whitaker AK; Endres LK; Mistretta SQ; Gilliam ML
    Contraception; 2014 Jun; 89(6):534-9. PubMed ID: 24457061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception.
    Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun; 18(101):125-30. PubMed ID: 19637436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transvaginal ultrasonographic assessment of the expulsion rate of intrauterine devices inserted in the immediate postpartum period: a pilot study.
    Letti Müller AL; Lopes Ramos JG; Martins-Costa SH; Palma Dias RS; Valério EG; Hammes LS; Glitz CL; Zucatto AE; Vettori DV; Magalhães JA
    Contraception; 2005 Sep; 72(3):192-5. PubMed ID: 16102554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Postpartum insertion of modified intrauterine devices.
    Cole LP; Edelman DA; Potts DM; Wheeler RG; Laufe LE
    J Reprod Med; 1984 Sep; 29(9):677-82. PubMed ID: 6387112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Expulsion rate of intrauterine device: mediate vs. immediate puerperium period.
    Hochmuller JT; Lopes KS; Guazzelli CAF; Gomes MKO; Araujo Júnior E; Peixoto AB
    J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc; 2020 Sep; 21(3):143-149. PubMed ID: 32517434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of echosonography to monitor uterine placement of intrauterine devices after immediate postpartum insertions.
    Ortiz Mariscal JD; Guerrero Barrera C; Wheeler RG; Waszak CS
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1987 Feb; 25(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 2883046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Immediate postplacental insertion and fixation of the CuFix postpartum implant system.
    Van Kets H; Parewijck W; Van der Pas H; Batar I; Creatsas G; Koumantakis K; Thiery M
    Contraception; 1993 Oct; 48(4):349-57. PubMed ID: 8222662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Wider opportunities for IUD insertion.
    Cole LP; Potts DM
    IPPF Med Bull; 1983 Feb; 17(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 12264751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of ultrasound in predicting success of intrauterine contraceptive device insertion immediately after delivery.
    Dias T; Abeykoon S; Kumarasiri S; Gunawardena C; Padeniya T; D'Antonio F
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jul; 46(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 25418016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intrauterine device termination rates and the menstrual cycle day of insertion.
    White MK; Ory HW; Rooks JB; Rochat RW
    Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Feb; 55(2):220-4. PubMed ID: 7352085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Six-month and 1-year continuation rates following postpartum insertion of implants and intrauterine devices.
    Woo I; Seifert S; Hendricks D; Jamshidi RM; Burke AE; Fox MC
    Contraception; 2015 Dec; 92(6):532-5. PubMed ID: 26408376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contraceptive effectiveness of immediate compared with delayed insertion of intrauterine devices after abortion: a decision analysis.
    Reeves MF; Smith KJ; Creinin MD
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jun; 109(6):1286-94. PubMed ID: 17540799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.