These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
696 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15999438)
1. Abortion legislation after Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: model statutes and commentaries. Smolin DM Cumberland Law Rev; 1989-1990; 20(1):71-163. PubMed ID: 15999438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. State legislation on abortion after Roe v. Wade: selected constitutional issues. Bryant MD Am J Law Med; 1976; 2(1):101-32. PubMed ID: 973625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Webster and the politics of abortion. Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(2):36-8. PubMed ID: 2703338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Webster versus reproductive health services. Rhodes AM MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 1989; 14(6):423. PubMed ID: 2514333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Coercing conscience: the effort to mandate abortion as a standard of care. Kramlich M Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2004; 4(1):29-40. PubMed ID: 15192848 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A world without Roe: how different would it be? Glendon MA Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(4):30-1. PubMed ID: 2745061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is there life after Roe v. Wade? Mahowald MB Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(4):22-9. PubMed ID: 2663777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Consti-tortion: tort law as an end-run around abortion rights after Planned Parenthood v. Casey. Stone AJ Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2000; 8(2):471-515. PubMed ID: 16594110 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Legislation on contraception and abortion for adolescents. Roemer R Stud Fam Plann; 1985; 16(5):241-51. PubMed ID: 4060209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Family law I: abortion. Koscs ME Annu Surv Am Law; 1984; 2():929-60. PubMed ID: 16086473 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Can Congress settle the abortion issue? Segers MC Hastings Cent Rep; 1982 Jun; 12(3):20-8. PubMed ID: 7107237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Forgotten Supreme Court abortion cases: Drs. Hawker and Hurwitz in the deck and defrocked. Lucas R Pepperdine Law Rev; 2003 May; 30(4):641-70. PubMed ID: 15237509 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court. Brown HO Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Donohue lecture series: "Roe v. Wade: past and future". Weddington S Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1990; 24(3):601-20. PubMed ID: 16047442 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. What happens if Roe is overruled? Extraterritorial regulation of abortion by the states. Bradford CS Ariz Law Rev; 1993; 35(1):87-171. PubMed ID: 12645556 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Just what does Webster mean? Crigger BJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 2312263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Abortion law today. Field MA J Leg Med; 1993 Mar; 14(1):3-24. PubMed ID: 8463750 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Will Webster redefine Roe v. Wade? The Supreme Court could use a Missouri case to begin limiting abortion rights. Chopko ME Health Prog; 1989 Jun; 70(5):58-64. PubMed ID: 10293331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]