697 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15999438)
1. Abortion legislation after Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: model statutes and commentaries.
Smolin DM
Cumberland Law Rev; 1989-1990; 20(1):71-163. PubMed ID: 15999438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. State legislation on abortion after Roe v. Wade: selected constitutional issues.
Bryant MD
Am J Law Med; 1976; 2(1):101-32. PubMed ID: 973625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Four-one-four.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(5):27-9. PubMed ID: 2793440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Webster and the politics of abortion.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(2):36-8. PubMed ID: 2703338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Webster versus reproductive health services.
Rhodes AM
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 1989; 14(6):423. PubMed ID: 2514333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Coercing conscience: the effort to mandate abortion as a standard of care.
Kramlich M
Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2004; 4(1):29-40. PubMed ID: 15192848
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A world without Roe: how different would it be?
Glendon MA
Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(4):30-1. PubMed ID: 2745061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is there life after Roe v. Wade?
Mahowald MB
Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(4):22-9. PubMed ID: 2663777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Consti-tortion: tort law as an end-run around abortion rights after Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
Stone AJ
Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2000; 8(2):471-515. PubMed ID: 16594110
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Roe v. Wade reaffirmed, again.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Oct; 16(5):26-7. PubMed ID: 3771197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Legislation on contraception and abortion for adolescents.
Roemer R
Stud Fam Plann; 1985; 16(5):241-51. PubMed ID: 4060209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Family law I: abortion.
Koscs ME
Annu Surv Am Law; 1984; 2():929-60. PubMed ID: 16086473
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Can Congress settle the abortion issue?
Segers MC
Hastings Cent Rep; 1982 Jun; 12(3):20-8. PubMed ID: 7107237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Forgotten Supreme Court abortion cases: Drs. Hawker and Hurwitz in the deck and defrocked.
Lucas R
Pepperdine Law Rev; 2003 May; 30(4):641-70. PubMed ID: 15237509
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court.
Brown HO
Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Donohue lecture series: "Roe v. Wade: past and future".
Weddington S
Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1990; 24(3):601-20. PubMed ID: 16047442
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. What happens if Roe is overruled? Extraterritorial regulation of abortion by the states.
Bradford CS
Ariz Law Rev; 1993; 35(1):87-171. PubMed ID: 12645556
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Just what does Webster mean?
Crigger BJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 2312263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Abortion law today.
Field MA
J Leg Med; 1993 Mar; 14(1):3-24. PubMed ID: 8463750
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Will Webster redefine Roe v. Wade? The Supreme Court could use a Missouri case to begin limiting abortion rights.
Chopko ME
Health Prog; 1989 Jun; 70(5):58-64. PubMed ID: 10293331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
