These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

702 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15999438)

  • 41. Abortion and its viability standard: the woman's diminishing right to choose.
    Swyers MH
    Geoge Mason Univ Civ Rights Law J; 1997; 8(1-2):87-109. PubMed ID: 14628785
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The implications of Webster for practicing physicians.
    Allen AE; Pearse WH
    JAMA; 1989 Sep; 262(11):1510-1. PubMed ID: 2769903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. South Dakota's abortion script--threatening the physician-patient relationship.
    Lazzarini Z
    N Engl J Med; 2008 Nov; 359(21):2189-91. PubMed ID: 19020321
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Supreme Court rules on access to contraception, abortion: states can deny Medicaid benefits, hospital services for elective abortions.
    Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1977 Aug; 6(4):41+. PubMed ID: 11663780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Winter count: taking stock of abortion rights after Casey and Carhart.
    Borgmann CE
    Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):675-716. PubMed ID: 16700116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. State constitutional privacy rights post Webster--broader protection against abortion restrictions?
    Ezzard MM
    Denver Univ Law Rev; 1990; 67(3):401-19. PubMed ID: 15999439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Location and life: how Stenberg v. Carhart undercut Roe v. Wade.
    Stith R
    William Mary J Women Law; 2003; 9(2):255-78. PubMed ID: 15977326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Substantive due process after Gonzales v. Carhart.
    Calabresi SG
    Mich Law Rev; 2008 Jun; 106(8):1517-42. PubMed ID: 18595213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The Court edges away from Roe v. Wade.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1989; 21(4):184-7. PubMed ID: 2792338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Roe v. Wade and the lesson of the pre-Roe case law.
    Morgan RG
    Mich Law Rev; 1979 Aug; 77(7):1724-48. PubMed ID: 10245969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The unacknowledged consensus on abortion.
    Watson K
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):57-9. PubMed ID: 21161849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. After Ayotte: the need to defend abortion rights with renewed "purpose.".
    Harv Law Rev; 2006 Jun; 119(8):2552-73. PubMed ID: 16827220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Journey through the courts: minors, abortion and the quest for reproductive fairness.
    Ehrlich JS
    Yale J Law Fem; 1998; 10(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 16596765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Abortion 1990s: contemporary issues and the activist court.
    Bertz RC
    West State Univ Law Rev; 1992; 19(2):393-429. PubMed ID: 16047452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Court backs states on abortion.
    Marwick C
    JAMA; 1989 Jul; 262(4):451-2. PubMed ID: 2739042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The abortion arena: recent activity.
    Goldstein LS; Comeau DJ
    Leg Med; 1982; ():213-26. PubMed ID: 7121180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Parents, judges, and a minor's abortion decisions: third party participation and the evolution of a judicial alternative.
    Green W
    Akron Law Rev; 1983; 17(1):87-110. PubMed ID: 16086471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Refusal clause seen as threat to reproductive health, gag on information.
    Krisberg K
    Nations Health; 2005 Feb; 35(1):1, 10. PubMed ID: 15810206
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Lochner redeemed: family privacy after Troxel and Carhart.
    Meyer DD
    UCLA Law Rev; 2001 Jun; 48(5):1125-90. PubMed ID: 16273684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Roe v. Wade reaffirmed.
    Annas GJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1983 Aug; 13(4):21-2. PubMed ID: 6629744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 36.