These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15999790)

  • 1. [Speech discrimination through telephone in patients implanted with a Combi 40+].
    Castro A; Lassaletta L; Bastarrica M; Prim MP; de Sarriá MJ; Gavilán J
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2005; 56(6):246-51. PubMed ID: 15999790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of different mobile telephones in Combi40+ users.
    Castro A; Lassaletta L; Bastarrica M; Prim MP; De Sarriá MJ; Gavilán J
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 Jul; 126(7):714-7. PubMed ID: 16803710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Benefits from a mobile telephone adapter in Combi40+ cochlear implant users.
    Castro A; Lassaletta L; Bastarrica M; Perez-Mora R; Josefa De Sarria M; Gavilan J
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Jun; 128(6):661-5. PubMed ID: 18568501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. HiResolution and conventional sound processing in the HiResolution bionic ear: using appropriate outcome measures to assess speech recognition ability.
    Koch DB; Osberger MJ; Segel P; Kessler D
    Audiol Neurootol; 2004; 9(4):214-23. PubMed ID: 15205549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.
    Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W
    Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech discrimination scores of postlingually deaf adults implanted with the Combi 40 cochlear implant.
    Gstoettner WK; Hamzavi J; Baumgartner WD
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1998 Sep; 118(5):640-5. PubMed ID: 9840498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Speech discrimination in noise for patients with cochlear implants].
    Hamzavi J; Adunka O; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2000 Jun; 112(11):498-504. PubMed ID: 10890128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Telephone use by a multi-channel cochlear implant patient. An evaluation using open-set CID sentences.
    Brown AM; Clark GM; Dowell RC; Martin LF; Seligman PM
    J Laryngol Otol; 1985 Mar; 99(3):231-8. PubMed ID: 3838331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech understanding in quiet and noise in bilateral users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implant system.
    Müller J; Schön F; Helms J
    Ear Hear; 2002 Jun; 23(3):198-206. PubMed ID: 12072612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perception of connected speech without lipreading, using a multi-channel hearing prosthesis.
    Dowell RC; Clark GM; Seligman PM; Brown AM
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1986; 102(1-2):7-11. PubMed ID: 3755563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mobile and landline telephone performance outcomes among telephone-using cochlear implant recipients.
    Tan BY; Gluth MB; Statham EL; Eikelboom RH; Atlas MD
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Feb; 146(2):283-8. PubMed ID: 21969279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of continuous interleaved sampling and simultaneous analog stimulation speech processing strategies in newly implanted adults with a Clarion 1.2 cochlear implant.
    Zwolan TA; Kileny PR; Smith S; Waltzman S; Chute P; Domico E; Firszt J; Hodges A; Mills D; Whearty M; Osberger MJ; Fisher L
    Otol Neurotol; 2005 May; 26(3):455-65. PubMed ID: 15891649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech perception and communication ability over the telephone by Mandarin-speaking children with cochlear implants.
    Wu CM; Liu TC; Wang NM; Chao WC
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Aug; 77(8):1295-302. PubMed ID: 23768483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of programming threshold and maplaw settings on acoustic thresholds and speech discrimination with the MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implant.
    Boyd PJ
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):608-18. PubMed ID: 17086073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical evaluation of higher stimulation rates in the nucleus research platform 8 system.
    Plant K; Holden L; Skinner M; Arcaroli J; Whitford L; Law MA; Nel E
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):381-93. PubMed ID: 17485987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech discrimination scores of postlingually deaf adults implanted with the Combi 40 cochlear implant.
    Gstoettner WK; Hamzavi J; Baumgartner WD
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 57():323-6. PubMed ID: 11892180
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cochllear implants and GSM phone.
    Sorri MJ; Huttunen KH; Välimaa TT; Karinen PJ; Löppönen HJ
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 2001; (52):54-6. PubMed ID: 11318483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nucleus 24 advanced encoder conversion study: performance versus preference.
    Skinner MW; Arndt PL; Staller SJ
    Ear Hear; 2002 Feb; 23(1 Suppl):2S-17S. PubMed ID: 11883765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fitting prelingually deafened adult cochlear implant users based on electrode discrimination performance.
    Debruyne JA; Francart T; Janssen AM; Douma K; Brokx JP
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Mar; 56(3):174-185. PubMed ID: 27758152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Cochlear implants in elderly: performance outcomes in the long term].
    Marx M; Gutierrez D; Lepage B; Khoury E; Laborde ML; Deguine O; Fraysse B
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2011; 132(4-5):187-91. PubMed ID: 22908538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.