906 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16001039)
21. Korean scandal will have global fallout.
Check E; Cyranoski D
Nature; 2005 Dec; 438(7071):1056-7. PubMed ID: 16371963
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Bureaucracy won't change the character of a cheat.
Bentley P
Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):782-4. PubMed ID: 16482126
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Named and shamed.
Cyranoski D
Nature; 2006 May; 441(7092):392-3. PubMed ID: 16724027
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Meyer case poses a challenge to the system.
Málaga-Trillo E; Gerlach G
Nature; 2004 Sep; 431(7008):505. PubMed ID: 15457230
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Fraud offers big rewards for relatively little risk.
Fenning TM
Nature; 2004 Jan; 427(6973):393. PubMed ID: 14749800
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Retractions' realities.
Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6927):1. PubMed ID: 12621394
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Duplicate publication Part 1. Consideration of the issues.
Davidhizar R; Newman Giger J
Nurse Author Ed; 2002; 12(3):1-4. PubMed ID: 12092429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Complacency about misconduct.
Nature; 2004 Jan; 427(6969):1. PubMed ID: 14702049
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Publication dilemmas.
Hughes G
Emerg Med J; 2007 Sep; 24(9):610. PubMed ID: 17711931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. [Investigation of scientific fraud. Statements from the Swedish Research Council not sufficiently normative].
Werkö L
Lakartidningen; 2006 Oct 25-31; 103(43):3288-91. PubMed ID: 17117661
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Bad peer reviewers.
Nature; 2001 Sep; 413(6852):93. PubMed ID: 11557930
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Self-plagiarism.
Wiwanitkit V
Eur J Clin Invest; 2012 Oct; 42(10):1145; author reply 1146. PubMed ID: 22428656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Three cheers for peers.
Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7073):118. PubMed ID: 16407911
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Cash for papers: putting a premium on publication.
Fuyuno I; Cyranoski D
Nature; 2006 Jun; 441(7095):792. PubMed ID: 16778850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The trouble with replication.
Giles J
Nature; 2006 Jul; 442(7101):344-7. PubMed ID: 16871184
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Journals under pressure: publish, and be damned.
Adam D; Knight J
Nature; 2002 Oct; 419(6909):772-6. PubMed ID: 12397323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Editors are meant to be judges, not postmen.
Michell B
Nature; 2003 May; 423(6939):479-80; discussion 480. PubMed ID: 12774094
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Publication ethics.
Hays JC
Public Health Nurs; 2009; 26(3):205-6. PubMed ID: 19386055
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Reviewers peering from under a pile of 'omics' data.
Nicholson JK
Nature; 2006 Apr; 440(7087):992. PubMed ID: 16625173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. What do duplicate publications; self-plagiarism and the monotony of endless descriptive studies signify: publication pressures or simply a collective lack of imagination?
O'Connor SJ
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2010 May; 19(3):281-3. PubMed ID: 20525059
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
