These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16001469)

  • 1. When the shouting has to stop: America and abortion.
    Economist; 1992 Apr; 323(7756):15-6. PubMed ID: 16001469
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Supreme Court, abortion policy, and state response: a preliminary analysis.
    Nicholson JB; Steward DW
    Publius; 1978; 8(1):159-78. PubMed ID: 11664024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Abortion in America.
    Shostak AB
    Futurist; 1991; 25(4):20-4. PubMed ID: 16145782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What happens if Roe is overruled? Extraterritorial regulation of abortion by the states.
    Bradford CS
    Ariz Law Rev; 1993; 35(1):87-171. PubMed ID: 12645556
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Coercing conscience: the effort to mandate abortion as a standard of care.
    Kramlich M
    Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2004; 4(1):29-40. PubMed ID: 15192848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Parents, judges, and a minor's abortion decisions: third party participation and the evolution of a judicial alternative.
    Green W
    Akron Law Rev; 1983; 17(1):87-110. PubMed ID: 16086471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Casey reflections.
    Cavendish EA
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2002; 10(2):305-14. PubMed ID: 16526134
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. State constitutional privacy rights post Webster--broader protection against abortion restrictions?
    Ezzard MM
    Denver Univ Law Rev; 1990; 67(3):401-19. PubMed ID: 15999439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Physician assistant as abortion provider: lessons from Vermont, New York, and Montana.
    Schirmer JT
    Hastings Law J; 1997 Nov; 49(1):253-88. PubMed ID: 14758819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2000.
    Arkes H
    Hum Life Rev; 2000; 26(4):15-26. PubMed ID: 12530369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Constitutionalizing Roe, Casey and Carhart: a legislative due-process anti-discrimination principle that gives constitutional content to the "undue burden" standard of review applied to abortion control legislation.
    Van Detta JA
    South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2001; 10(2):211-92. PubMed ID: 16485363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Casey undue burden standard: problems predicted and encountered, and the split over the Salerno test.
    Burdick R
    Hastings Constit Law Q; 1996; 23():825-76. PubMed ID: 16086482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Abortion wars, once again. The case being argued this week before the Supreme Court may determine just how far state restrictions can go.
    Halloran L
    US News World Rep; 2005 Dec; 139(21):29-30. PubMed ID: 16389673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Abortion in 1938 and today: plus ca change, plus c'est la meme chose.
    Bourne RW
    South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2003; 12(2):225-75. PubMed ID: 16493843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prenatal tort law and the personhood of the unborn child: a separate legal existence.
    Roden GJ
    St Thomas Law Rev; 2003; 16(1):207-86. PubMed ID: 16211760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Abortion issue moves to states: shift on federal bench spurs governors, legislators to battle Roe.
    Solomon D
    Wall St J (East Ed); 2006 Mar; ():A4. PubMed ID: 16578913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Commerce Clause and federal abortion law: why progressives might be tempted to embrace federalism.
    Goldberg J
    Fordham Law Rev; 2006 Oct; 75(1):301-54. PubMed ID: 17115483
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Casey and its impact on abortion regulation.
    Moses MF
    Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):805-15. PubMed ID: 16700123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Forgotten Supreme Court abortion cases: Drs. Hawker and Hurwitz in the deck and defrocked.
    Lucas R
    Pepperdine Law Rev; 2003 May; 30(4):641-70. PubMed ID: 15237509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The worst of both worlds?: parental involvement requirements and the privacy rights of mature minors.
    O'Shaughnessy M
    Ohio State Law J; 1996; 57(5):1731-65. PubMed ID: 16086519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.