These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 160021)

  • 1. A controlled trial of manipulation in a selected group of patients with low back pain favouring one side.
    Fisk JW
    N Z Med J; 1979 Oct; 90(645):288-91. PubMed ID: 160021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A benefit of spinal manipulation as adjunctive therapy for acute low-back pain: a stratified controlled trial.
    Hadler NM; Curtis P; Gillings DB; Stinnett S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1987 Sep; 12(7):702-6. PubMed ID: 2961085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of spinal manipulation on pain and prostaglandin levels in women with primary dysmenorrhea.
    Kokjohn K; Schmid DM; Triano JJ; Brennan PC
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1992 Jun; 15(5):279-85. PubMed ID: 1535359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Functional outcomes of low back pain: comparison of four treatment groups in a randomized controlled trial.
    Hsieh CY; Phillips RB; Adams AH; Pope MH
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1992 Jan; 15(1):4-9. PubMed ID: 1531488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Chiropractic adjustive manipulation on subjects with acute low back pain: visual analog pain scores and plasma beta-endorphin levels.
    Sanders GE; Reinert O; Tepe R; Maloney P
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1990 Sep; 13(7):391-5. PubMed ID: 2145384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The immediate effect of manipulation versus mobilization on pain and range of motion in the cervical spine: a randomized controlled trial.
    Cassidy JD; Lopes AA; Yong-Hing K
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1992; 15(9):570-5. PubMed ID: 1469341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acute low back pain. Comparison of two conservative treatment approaches.
    Farrell JP; Twomey LT
    Med J Aust; 1982 Feb; 1(4):160-4. PubMed ID: 6210835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Twenty years of randomized clinical trials of manipulative therapy for back pain: a review.
    Abenhaim L; Bergeron AM
    Clin Invest Med; 1992 Dec; 15(6):527-35. PubMed ID: 1286535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Back pain during pregnancy and labor.
    Diakow PR; Gadsby TA; Gadsby JB; Gleddie JG; Leprich DJ; Scales AM
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1991 Feb; 14(2):116-8. PubMed ID: 1826921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Musculoskeletal manipulation in the treatment of low back pain.
    Tobis JS; Hoehler FK
    Bull N Y Acad Med; 1983 Sep; 59(7):660-8. PubMed ID: 6226331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An open study of diflunisal, conservative and manipulative therapy in the management of acute mechanical low back pain.
    Waterworth RF; Hunter IA
    N Z Med J; 1985 May; 98(779):372-5. PubMed ID: 3157894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Conservative lower back treatment reduces inhibition in knee-extensor muscles: a randomized controlled trial.
    Suter E; McMorland G; Herzog W; Bray R
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2000 Feb; 23(2):76-80. PubMed ID: 10714531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effectiveness of massage therapy for subacute low-back pain: a randomized controlled trial.
    Preyde M
    CMAJ; 2000 Jun; 162(13):1815-20. PubMed ID: 10906914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Hmax/Mmax ratio as an outcome measure for acute low back pain.
    Cramer GD; Humphreys CR; Hondras MA; McGregor M; Triano JJ
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1993 Jan; 16(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 8423429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The efficacy of chiropractic manipulation for back pain: blinded review of relevant randomized clinical trials.
    Assendelft WJ; Koes BW; van der Heijden GJ; Bouter LM
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1992 Oct; 15(8):487-94. PubMed ID: 1402408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of a mechanical pain stimulus on erector spinae activity before and after a spinal manipulation in patients with back pain: a preliminary investigation.
    Lehman GJ; Vernon H; McGill SM
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2001; 24(6):402-6. PubMed ID: 11514817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lymphocyte profiles in patients with chronic low back pain enrolled in a clinical trial.
    Brennan PC; Graham MA; Triano JJ; Hondras MA; Anderson RJ
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1994 May; 17(4):219-27. PubMed ID: 8046277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of the Swedish Back School in chronic idiopathic low back pain. A prospective controlled study.
    Lankhorst GJ; Van de Stadt RJ; Vogelaar TW; Van der Korst JK; Prevo AJ
    Scand J Rehabil Med; 1983; 15(3):141-5. PubMed ID: 6195731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The short-term effect of a spinal manipulation on pain/pressure threshold in patients with chronic mechanical low back pain.
    Côté P; Mior SA; Vernon H
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1994; 17(6):364-8. PubMed ID: 7964196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Immediate improvements in side-to-side weight bearing and iliac crest symmetry after manipulation in patients with low back pain.
    Childs JD; Piva SR; Erhard RE
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2004 Jun; 27(5):306-13. PubMed ID: 15195038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.