These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1600213)

  • 21. Loudness discrimination of speech signals spectrally shaped by a simulated hearing aid.
    Rakerd B; Punch J; Hooks W; Amlani A; Vander Velde TJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1999 Dec; 42(6):1285-94. PubMed ID: 10599612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of hearing aid frequency response fittings in pediatric and young adult bimodal recipients.
    Davidson LS; Firszt JB; Brenner C; Cadieux JH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Apr; 26(4):393-407. PubMed ID: 25879243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Should children who use cochlear implants wear hearing aids in the opposite ear?
    Ching TY; Psarros C; Hill M; Dillon H; Incerti P
    Ear Hear; 2001 Oct; 22(5):365-80. PubMed ID: 11605945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Key issues in hearing aid selection and evaluation.
    Byrne D
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1992 Mar; 3(2):67-80. PubMed ID: 1600218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Relative loudness perception of low and high frequency sounds in the open and occluded ear.
    Keidser G; Katsch R; Dillon H; Grant F
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Jun; 107(6):3351-7. PubMed ID: 10875380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Loudness scaling revisited.
    Elberling C
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1999 May; 10(5):248-60. PubMed ID: 10331617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of UCL on aided Articulation Index calculation.
    Berger KW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1991 Jul; 2(3):151-5. PubMed ID: 1768883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effect of presentation level on normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners' acceptable speech and noise levels.
    Recker KL; Edwards BW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jan; 24(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 23231813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Differences in loudness of positive and negative Schroeder-phase tone complexes as a function of the fundamental frequency.
    Mauermann M; Hohmann V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Feb; 121(2):1028-39. PubMed ID: 17348525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Improving audibility with nonlinear amplification for listeners with high-frequency loss.
    Souza PE; Bishop RD
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2000 Apr; 11(4):214-23. PubMed ID: 10783924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A measure for predicting audibility discrimination thresholds for spectral envelope distortions in vowel sounds.
    Rao P; van Dinther R; Veldhuis R; Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 May; 109(5 Pt 1):2085-97. PubMed ID: 11386560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Verifying loudness perception after hearing aid fitting.
    Cox RM; Gray GA
    Am J Audiol; 2001 Dec; 10(2):91-8. PubMed ID: 11808725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Complex and pure-tone signals in the evaluation of hearing-aid characteristics.
    Stelmachowicz PG; Lewis DE; Seewald RC; Hawkins DB
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Jun; 33(2):380-5. PubMed ID: 2359278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Spectral and binaural loudness summation for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Oetting D; Hohmann V; Appell JE; Kollmeier B; Ewert SD
    Hear Res; 2016 May; 335():179-192. PubMed ID: 27006003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sound quality and speech reception for prescribed hearing aid frequency responses.
    Leijon A; Lindkvist A; Ringdahl A; Israelsson B
    Ear Hear; 1991 Aug; 12(4):251-60. PubMed ID: 1783227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A model to evaluate and maximize hearing aid performance by integrating the articulation index across listening conditions.
    Hou Z; Thornton AR
    Ear Hear; 1994 Feb; 15(1):105-12. PubMed ID: 8194674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The relationship between the acoustic reflex threshold and levels of loudness categories in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Olsen SO; Rasmussen AN; Nielsen LH; Borgkvist BV
    Audiology; 1999; 38(6):308-11. PubMed ID: 10582531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Preferred overall loudness. I: Sound field presentation in the laboratory.
    Smeds K; Keidser G; Zakis J; Dillon H; Leijon A; Grant F; Convery E; Brew C
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Jan; 45(1):2-11. PubMed ID: 16562559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Control of hearing-aid saturated sound pressure level by frequency-shaped output compression limiting.
    McDermott HJ; Dean MR; Dillon H
    Scand Audiol; 1999; 28(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 10207954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.