198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16002263)
1. Image segmentation feature selection and pattern classification for mammographic microcalcifications.
Fu JC; Lee SK; Wong ST; Yeh JY; Wang AH; Wu HK
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2005 Sep; 29(6):419-29. PubMed ID: 16002263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computerized analysis of mammographic microcalcifications in morphological and texture feature spaces.
Chan HP; Sahiner B; Lam KL; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Goodsitt MM; Adler DD
Med Phys; 1998 Oct; 25(10):2007-19. PubMed ID: 9800710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Characterization of clustered microcalcifications in digitized mammograms using neural networks and support vector machines.
Papadopoulos A; Fotiadis DI; Likas A
Artif Intell Med; 2005 Jun; 34(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 15894178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Feature extraction and pattern classification of colorectal polyps in colonoscopic imaging.
Fu JJ; Yu YW; Lin HM; Chai JW; Chen CC
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2014 Jun; 38(4):267-75. PubMed ID: 24495469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A CAD system for the automatic detection of clustered microcalcifications in digitized mammogram films.
Yu S; Guan L
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2000 Feb; 19(2):115-26. PubMed ID: 10784283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimizing parameters for computer-aided diagnosis of microcalcifications at mammography.
Leichter I; Lederman R; Buchbinder S; Bamberger P; Novak B; Fields S
Acad Radiol; 2000 Jun; 7(6):406-12. PubMed ID: 10845399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast microcalcifications detection based on fusing features with DTCWT.
Wang Z; Xin J; Zhang Q; Gao S; Ma C; Ren J; Zhang H; Qian W; Zhu W; Zhang X; Liu J
J Xray Sci Technol; 2020; 28(2):197-218. PubMed ID: 31985483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A support vector machine approach for detection of microcalcifications.
El-Naqa I; Yang Y; Wernick MN; Galatsanos NP; Nishikawa RM
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 Dec; 21(12):1552-63. PubMed ID: 12588039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improving the accuracy in detection of clustered microcalcifications with a context-sensitive classification model.
Wang J; Nishikawa RM; Yang Y
Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 43(1):159. PubMed ID: 26745908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Automated classification of clustered microcalcifications into malignant and benign types.
Veldkamp WJ; Karssemeijer N; Otten JD; Hendriks JH
Med Phys; 2000 Nov; 27(11):2600-8. PubMed ID: 11128313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computerized classification of malignant and benign microcalcifications on mammograms: texture analysis using an artificial neural network.
Chan HP; Sahiner B; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Lam KL; Adler DD; Goodsitt MM
Phys Med Biol; 1997 Mar; 42(3):549-67. PubMed ID: 9080535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automated feature set selection and its application to MCC identification in digital mammograms for breast cancer detection.
Huang YJ; Chan DY; Cheng DC; Ho YJ; Tsai PP; Shen WC; Chen RF
Sensors (Basel); 2013 Apr; 13(4):4855-75. PubMed ID: 23580053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating geodesic active contours in microcalcifications segmentation on mammograms.
Duarte MA; Alvarenga AV; Azevedo CM; Calas MJ; Infantosi AF; Pereira WC
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2015 Dec; 122(3):304-15. PubMed ID: 26363676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A study on several machine-learning methods for classification of malignant and benign clustered microcalcifications.
Wei L; Yang Y; Nishikawa RM; Jiang Y
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 Mar; 24(3):371-80. PubMed ID: 15754987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Relevance vector machine for automatic detection of clustered microcalcifications.
Wei L; Yang Y; Nishikawa RM; Wernick MN; Edwards A
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 Oct; 24(10):1278-85. PubMed ID: 16229415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computerized evaluation of mammographic lesions: what diagnostic role does the shape of the individual microcalcifications play compared with the geometry of the cluster?
Leichter I; Lederman R; Buchbinder SS; Bamberger P; Novak B; Fields S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Mar; 182(3):705-12. PubMed ID: 14975973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A two-stage method for microcalcification cluster segmentation in mammography by deformable models.
Arikidis N; Vassiou K; Kazantzi A; Skiadopoulos S; Karahaliou A; Costaridou L
Med Phys; 2015 Oct; 42(10):5848-61. PubMed ID: 26429259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Segmentation for the enhancement of microcalcifications in digital mammograms.
Milosevic M; Jankovic D; Peulic A
Technol Health Care; 2014; 22(5):701-15. PubMed ID: 25059254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Digital mammography: observer performance study of the effects of pixel size on the characterization of malignant and benign microcalcifications.
Chan HP; Helvie MA; Petrick N; Sahiner B; Adler DD; Paramagul C; Roubidoux MA; Blane CE; Joynt LK; Wilson TE; Hadjiiski LM; Goodsitt MM
Acad Radiol; 2001 Jun; 8(6):454-66. PubMed ID: 11394537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Classification of microcalcifications in radiographs of pathologic specimens for the diagnosis of breast cancer.
Wu YC; Freedman MT; Hasegawa A; Zuurbier RA; Lo SC; Mun SK
Acad Radiol; 1995 Mar; 2(3):199-204. PubMed ID: 9419548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
