523 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16002592)
1. Epidemiology. Radiation dangerous even at lowest doses.
Kaiser J
Science; 2005 Jul; 309(5732):233. PubMed ID: 16002592
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Biologic responses to low doses of ionizing radiation: Detriment versus hormesis. Part 2. Dose responses of organisms.
Pollycove M; Feinendegen LE
J Nucl Med; 2001 Sep; 42(9):26N-32N, 37N. PubMed ID: 11554390
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Two principal considerations are needed after low doses of ionizing radiation.
Feinendegen LE; Paretzke H; Neumann RD
Radiat Res; 2008 Feb; 169(2):247-8. PubMed ID: 18220467
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Common sense about the linear no-threshold controversy-give the general public a break.
Leonard BE
Radiat Res; 2008 Feb; 169(2):245-6; author reply 246-7. PubMed ID: 18220465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The meaning of low dose and low dose-rate.
Wakeford R; Tawn EJ
J Radiol Prot; 2010 Mar; 30(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 20234068
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Economic and policy considerations drive the LNT debate.
Mossman KL
Radiat Res; 2008 Feb; 169(2):245; author reply 246-7. PubMed ID: 18220464
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [The effect of low doses of ionizing radiation on living organisms with special emphasis on evaluating the risk of these doses].
Kraljević P
Lijec Vjesn; 1988; 110(1-2):34-7. PubMed ID: 3283485
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Health risks from ionizing radiation in the environment].
Auvinen A
Duodecim; 2004; 120(13):1673-80. PubMed ID: 15326974
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Devastation in Japan. Radiation risks outlined by bombs, weapons work, and accidents.
Kaiser J
Science; 2011 Mar; 331(6024):1504. PubMed ID: 21436411
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Occupational radiation exposure: population studies.
Schleipman AR
Radiol Technol; 2005; 76(3):185-91. PubMed ID: 15732889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The low-level nuclear threat.
Nature; 2012 Feb; 482(7383):5. PubMed ID: 22297929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Biologic responses to low doses of ionizing radiation: adaptive response versus bystander effect.
Adelstein SJ
J Nucl Med; 2003 Jan; 44(1):125; author reply 125-6. PubMed ID: 12515886
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Low doses of ionizing radiation: the complexity of the problem and the uncertainty of late sequelae].
Davydov BI; Zhiliaev EG; Ushakov IB; Soldatov SK; Ushakov BN
Voen Med Zh; 1994 Apr; (4):20-4. PubMed ID: 8091690
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Biologic responses to low doses of ionizing radiation: detriment versus hormesis. Part 1. Dose responses of cells and tissues.
Feinendegen LE; Pollycove M
J Nucl Med; 2001 Jul; 42(7):17N-27N. PubMed ID: 11441881
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Radiation risks and their prevention].
Rytömaa T
Duodecim; 2003; 119(2):113-21. PubMed ID: 12607426
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Biological effects and mortality in connection with low dosage ionizing radiation].
Henriksen JH
Ugeskr Laeger; 2001 Jan; 163(1):44-5. PubMed ID: 11586674
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [How to understand low dose risks].
Nakamura N
Igaku Butsuri; 2012; 32(4):202-8. PubMed ID: 24568026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Low levels of ionising radiation may cause harm.
J Radiol Prot; 2005 Sep; 25(3):333-5. PubMed ID: 16312035
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Age-time patterns for cancer and noncancer excess risks in the atomic bomb survivors.
Preston DL; Pierce DA; Shimizu Y
Radiat Res; 2000 Dec; 154(6):733-4;discussion 734-5. PubMed ID: 11187021
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Risk observations in radiologic practice with reference to indications for roentgen examination].
Beck HR
Strahlenschutz Forsch Prax; 1976; 16():98-110. PubMed ID: 1006709
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
