274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16003351)
1. Regulatory regimes for transgenic crops.
Schubert D
Nat Biotechnol; 2005 Jul; 23(7):785-7; author reply 787-9. PubMed ID: 16003351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Regulatory regimes for transgenic crops.
Wilson A; Latham J; Steinbrecher R
Nat Biotechnol; 2005 Jul; 23(7):785; author reply 787-9. PubMed ID: 16003352
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Flies in the soup--European GM labeling legislation.
Craddock N
Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Apr; 22(4):383-4. PubMed ID: 15060547
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Drugs in crops--the unpalatable truth.
Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Feb; 22(2):133. PubMed ID: 14755274
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Europe angers US with strict GM labeling.
Mitchell P
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Jan; 21(1):6. PubMed ID: 12511897
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Liabilities and economics of transgenic crops.
Smyth S; Khachatourians GG; Phillips PW
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Jun; 20(6):537-41. PubMed ID: 12042844
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. European Union in disarray over GM seeds.
Meldolesi A
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Apr; 20(4):324-5. PubMed ID: 11923823
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The science and politics of plant biotechnology--a personal perspective.
Vasil IK
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Aug; 21(8):849-51. PubMed ID: 12894193
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Food safety regulations.
Angell PS
Nat Biotechnol; 1999 Apr; 17(4):314. PubMed ID: 10207860
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Consumer acceptance of biotechnology and the role of second generation technologies in the USA and Europe.
Lusk JL; Rozan A
Trends Biotechnol; 2005 Aug; 23(8):386-7. PubMed ID: 15953650
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Drugs in crops (continued).
Phillips GC
Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Jun; 22(6):655-6. PubMed ID: 15175676
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. US-Indian agbiotech deal under scrutiny.
Jayaraman KS
Nat Biotechnol; 2006 May; 24(5):481. PubMed ID: 16680115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. National academy panel urges USDA to toughen reviews of transgenic plants.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Apr; 20(4):323-4. PubMed ID: 11923822
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. GM crops: science, politics and communication.
Arntzen CJ; Coghlan A; Johnson B; Peacock J; Rodemeyer M
Nat Rev Genet; 2003 Oct; 4(10):839-43. PubMed ID: 14526380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The gap between science and perception: the case of plant biotechnology in Europe.
Einsele A
Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol; 2007; 107():1-11. PubMed ID: 17522817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Regulating innovative crop technologies in Canada: the case of regulating genetically modified crops.
Smyth S; McHughen A
Plant Biotechnol J; 2008 Apr; 6(3):213-25. PubMed ID: 18028290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Flawed science underlies laws on transgenic crops.
Sandermann H
Nature; 2003 Aug; 424(6949):613. PubMed ID: 12904760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Genetically modified crops: success, safety assessment, and public concern.
Singh OV; Ghai S; Paul D; Jain RK
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2006 Aug; 71(5):598-607. PubMed ID: 16639559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Beyond food and evil.
Chen J
Duke Law J; 2007 Apr; 56(6):1581-6. PubMed ID: 17679180
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Much food, many problems.
Trewavas A
Nature; 1999 Nov; 402(6759):231-2. PubMed ID: 10580487
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
