BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

410 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16003372)

  • 41. Protein interaction networks of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster: large-scale organization and robustness.
    Li D; Li J; Ouyang S; Wang J; Wu S; Wan P; Zhu Y; Xu X; He F
    Proteomics; 2006 Jan; 6(2):456-61. PubMed ID: 16317777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Protein networking: insights into global functional organization of proteomes.
    Pieroni E; de la Fuente van Bentem S; Mancosu G; Capobianco E; Hirt H; de la Fuente A
    Proteomics; 2008 Feb; 8(4):799-816. PubMed ID: 18297653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Analysis of membrane protein complexes using the split-ubiquitin membrane yeast two-hybrid (MYTH) system.
    Kittanakom S; Chuk M; Wong V; Snyder J; Edmonds D; Lydakis A; Zhang Z; Auerbach D; Stagljar I
    Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 548():247-71. PubMed ID: 19521829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. InteroPORC: automated inference of highly conserved protein interaction networks.
    Michaut M; Kerrien S; Montecchi-Palazzi L; Chauvat F; Cassier-Chauvat C; Aude JC; Legrain P; Hermjakob H
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Jul; 24(14):1625-31. PubMed ID: 18508856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Graph-theoretical comparison reveals structural divergence of human protein interaction networks.
    Futschik ME; Tschaut A; Chaurasia G; Herzel H
    Genome Inform; 2007; 18():141-51. PubMed ID: 18546482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Efficient estimation of graphlet frequency distributions in protein-protein interaction networks.
    Przulj N; Corneil DG; Jurisica I
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Apr; 22(8):974-80. PubMed ID: 16452112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Modularity of cellular networks shows general center-periphery polarization.
    Vinogradov AE
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Dec; 24(24):2814-7. PubMed ID: 18953046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. What do we learn from high-throughput protein interaction data?
    Titz B; Schlesner M; Uetz P
    Expert Rev Proteomics; 2004 Jun; 1(1):111-21. PubMed ID: 15966804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Bioinformatics analysis of protein interaction networks: statistics, topologies, and meeting the standards of experimental biologists.
    Bulgakov VP; Tsitsiashvili GSh
    Biochemistry (Mosc); 2013 Oct; 78(10):1098-103. PubMed ID: 24237143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Studying the interactome with the yeast two-hybrid system and mass spectrometry.
    Causier B
    Mass Spectrom Rev; 2004; 23(5):350-67. PubMed ID: 15264234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Predicting co-complexed protein pairs using genomic and proteomic data integration.
    Zhang LV; Wong SL; King OD; Roth FP
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Apr; 5():38. PubMed ID: 15090078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Identification of human protein interaction domains using an ORFeome-based yeast two-hybrid fragment library.
    Waaijers S; Koorman T; Kerver J; Boxem M
    J Proteome Res; 2013 Jul; 12(7):3181-92. PubMed ID: 23718855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Plant protein interactomes.
    Braun P; Aubourg S; Van Leene J; De Jaeger G; Lurin C
    Annu Rev Plant Biol; 2013; 64():161-87. PubMed ID: 23330791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Analyzing protein-protein interaction networks.
    Koh GC; Porras P; Aranda B; Hermjakob H; Orchard SE
    J Proteome Res; 2012 Apr; 11(4):2014-31. PubMed ID: 22385417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Bacterial interactomes: from interactions to networks.
    Bouveret E; Brun C
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 804():15-33. PubMed ID: 22144146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Multi-level integrative analysis of Protein Protein Interaction networks: connecting completeness, depth and robustness.
    Blayney JK; Zheng H; Wang H; Azuaje F
    Int J Comput Biol Drug Des; 2010; 3(1):31-51. PubMed ID: 20693609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. High-quality binary protein interaction map of the yeast interactome network.
    Yu H; Braun P; Yildirim MA; Lemmens I; Venkatesan K; Sahalie J; Hirozane-Kishikawa T; Gebreab F; Li N; Simonis N; Hao T; Rual JF; Dricot A; Vazquez A; Murray RR; Simon C; Tardivo L; Tam S; Svrzikapa N; Fan C; de Smet AS; Motyl A; Hudson ME; Park J; Xin X; Cusick ME; Moore T; Boone C; Snyder M; Roth FP; Barabási AL; Tavernier J; Hill DE; Vidal M
    Science; 2008 Oct; 322(5898):104-10. PubMed ID: 18719252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A novel scoring approach for protein co-purification data reveals high interaction specificity.
    Yu X; Ivanic J; Wallqvist A; Reifman J
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2009 Sep; 5(9):e1000515. PubMed ID: 19779545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Transferring network topological knowledge for predicting protein-protein interactions.
    Xu Q; Xiang EW; Yang Q
    Proteomics; 2011 Oct; 11(19):3818-25. PubMed ID: 21770035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Resilience of protein-protein interaction networks as determined by their large-scale topological features.
    Rodrigues FA; Costa Lda F; Barbieri AL
    Mol Biosyst; 2011 Apr; 7(4):1263-9. PubMed ID: 21298132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.