943 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16003773)
1. Prognostic value of the 2002 TNM classification for breast carcinoma with regard to the number of metastatic axillary lymph nodes.
Duraker N; Caynak ZC
Cancer; 2005 Aug; 104(4):700-7. PubMed ID: 16003773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The 2003 revised TNM staging system for breast cancer: results of stage re-classification on survival and future comparisons among stage groups.
Escobar PF; Patrick RJ; Rybicki LA; Weng DE; Crowe JP
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Jan; 14(1):143-7. PubMed ID: 17058125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is there any prognostically different subgroup among patients with stage IIIC (any TN3M0) breast carcinoma?
Duraker N; Caynak ZC; Bati B
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Feb; 15(2):430-7. PubMed ID: 17912589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor-node-metastasis (AJCC TNM) staging in patients with stage II and stage III colorectal carcinoma: analysis of 2511 cases from a medical centre in Korea.
Kim KH; Yang SS; Yoon YS; Lim SB; Yu CS; Kim JC
Colorectal Dis; 2011 Aug; 13(8):e220-6. PubMed ID: 21689314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Prognosis after complete surgical resection for non-small cell lung cancer based on the staging classification].
Pfannschmidt J; Muley T; Hoffmann H; Bülzebruck H; Dienemann H
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2006 Nov; 131(47):2643-8. PubMed ID: 17109272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reassessment of the 1997 TNM classification system for renal cell carcinoma.
Elmore JM; Kadesky KT; Koeneman KS; Sagalowsky AI
Cancer; 2003 Dec; 98(11):2329-34. PubMed ID: 14635066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Influence of number of removed lymph nodes on the TNM staging and survival in advanced esophageal carcinoma].
Chen LQ; Hu CY; Zhang HL; He M; Meng XL; Ping YM
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2007 Aug; 29(8):604-8. PubMed ID: 18210881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of staging between the old (6th edition) and new (7th edition) TNM classifications in advanced gastric cancer.
Kikuchi S; Futawatari N; Sakuramoto S; Katada N; Yamashita K; Shibata T; Nemoto M; Watanabe M
Anticancer Res; 2011 Jun; 31(6):2361-5. PubMed ID: 21737665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The validity and significance of substage IIIC by node involvement in epithelial ovarian cancer: impact of nodal metastasis on patient survival.
Kanazawa K; Suzuki T; Tokashiki M
Gynecol Oncol; 1999 May; 73(2):237-41. PubMed ID: 10329040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Classification of lymph node metastases from gastric cancer: comparison between N-site and N-number systems. Our experience and review of the literature.
Aurello P; D'Angelo F; Rossi S; Bellagamba R; Cicchini C; Nigri G; Ercolani G; De Angelis R; Ramacciato G
Am Surg; 2007 Apr; 73(4):359-66. PubMed ID: 17439029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Survival rates of sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma with the new AJCC staging system.
Lee CH; Hur DG; Roh HJ; Rha KS; Jin HR; Rhee CS; Min YG
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Feb; 133(2):131-4. PubMed ID: 17309980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Survival impact of lymph node metastasis in TNM stage III carcinoma of the colon and rectum.
Tang R; Wang JY; Chen JS; Chang-Chien CR; Tang S; Lin SE; You YT; Hsu KC; Ho YS; Fan HA
J Am Coll Surg; 1995 Jun; 180(6):705-12. PubMed ID: 7773484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of the proposals of the international association for the study of lung cancer in the forthcoming edition of lung cancer staging system to predict long-term prognosis of operated patients.
Rena O; Massera F; Robustellini M; Papalia E; Delfanti R; Lisi E; Pirondini E; Turello D; Casadio C
Cancer J; 2010; 16(2):176-81. PubMed ID: 20404615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prediction of prognosis is not improved by the seventh and latest edition of the TNM classification for colorectal cancer in a single-center collective.
Nitsche U; Maak M; Schuster T; Künzli B; Langer R; Slotta-Huspenina J; Janssen KP; Friess H; Rosenberg R
Ann Surg; 2011 Nov; 254(5):793-800; discussion 800-1. PubMed ID: 22042471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prognostic value and clinical relevance of the 6th Edition 2002 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system in patients with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma.
Lei HJ; Chau GY; Lui WY; Tsay SH; King KL; Loong CC; Wu CW
J Am Coll Surg; 2006 Oct; 203(4):426-35. PubMed ID: 17000385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Changes in the 2003 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging for breast cancer dramatically affect stage-specific survival.
Woodward WA; Strom EA; Tucker SL; McNeese MD; Perkins GH; Schechter NR; Singletary SE; Theriault RL; Hortobagyi GN; Hunt KK; Buchholz TA
J Clin Oncol; 2003 Sep; 21(17):3244-8. PubMed ID: 12947058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of axillary lymph nodes removed in staging of node-positive breast carcinoma.
Kuru B; Bozgul M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Dec; 66(5):1328-34. PubMed ID: 16997505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical evaluation of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer defined by the fifth edition of the TNM classification in comparison with the Japanese system.
Fujii K; Isozaki H; Okajima K; Nomura E; Niki M; Sako S; Izumi N; Mabuchi H; Nishiguchi K; Tanigawa N
Br J Surg; 1999 May; 86(5):685-9. PubMed ID: 10361195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Evaluation of new TNM staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy].
Li BK; Cui BK; Yuan YF; Li JQ; Zhang YQ; Shi M; Li GH
Ai Zheng; 2005 Jul; 24(7):769-73. PubMed ID: 16004798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. New tumor-node-metastasis staging strategy for node-positive (stage III) rectal cancer: an analysis.
Greene FL; Stewart AK; Norton HJ
J Clin Oncol; 2004 May; 22(10):1778-84. PubMed ID: 14769855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
