These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16003922)

  • 1. [Extended push-out test to characterize the failure of bone-implant interface].
    Brandt J; Bierögel C; Holweg K; Hein W; Grellmann W
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2005 Jun; 50(6):201-6. PubMed ID: 16003922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A dynamic analytical model for impact evaluation of percutaneous implants.
    Swain R; Faulkner G; Raboud D; Wolfaardt J
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Oct; 130(5):051013. PubMed ID: 19045520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A finite element analysis of the push-out test: influence of test conditions.
    Dhert WJ; Verheyen CC; Braak LH; de Wijn JR; Klein CP; de Groot K; Rozing PM
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1992 Jan; 26(1):119-30. PubMed ID: 1577832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Simulation of impact test for determining "health" of percutaneous bone anchored implants.
    Jones S; Faulkner G; Raboud D; Fyfe K; Wolfaardt J
    J Biomech Eng; 2006 Oct; 128(5):647-53. PubMed ID: 16995750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of support conditions in the loading fixture on failure mechanisms in the push-out test: a finite element study.
    Harrigan TP; Kareh J; Harris WH
    J Orthop Res; 1990 Sep; 8(5):678-84. PubMed ID: 2388107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of screw positioning in a new anterior spine fixator on implant loosening in osteoporotic vertebrae.
    Reinhold M; Schwieger K; Goldhahn J; Linke B; Knop C; Blauth M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Feb; 31(4):406-13. PubMed ID: 16481950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tribology and total hip joint replacement: current concepts in mechanical simulation.
    Affatato S; Spinelli M; Zavalloni M; Mazzega-Fabbro C; Viceconti M
    Med Eng Phys; 2008 Dec; 30(10):1305-17. PubMed ID: 18774742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development of implant movement checker for determining dental implant stability.
    Wijaya SK; Oka H; Saratani K; Sumikawa T; Kawazoe T
    Med Eng Phys; 2004 Jul; 26(6):513-22. PubMed ID: 15234687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bone attachment to glass-fibre-reinforced composite implant with porous surface.
    Mattila RH; Laurila P; Rekola J; Gunn J; Lassila LV; Mäntylä T; Aho AJ; Vallittu PK
    Acta Biomater; 2009 Jun; 5(5):1639-46. PubMed ID: 19268643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Natural frequency analysis of osseointegration for trans-femoral implant.
    Shao F; Xu W; Crocombe A; Ewins D
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2007 May; 35(5):817-24. PubMed ID: 17377843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comments on "Tribology and total hip joint replacement: current concepts in mechanical simulation" [Med. Eng. Phys. 30 (2008) 1305-1317].
    Asseman F
    Med Eng Phys; 2009 Jul; 31(6):730; author reply 731. PubMed ID: 19342287
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Peri-implant stress analysis in simulation models with or without trabecular bone structure.
    Stegaroiu R; Watanabe N; Tanaka M; Ejiri S; Nomura S; Miyakawa O
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 16479759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Artificial composite bone as a model of human trabecular bone: the implant-bone interface.
    Grant JA; Bishop NE; Götzen N; Sprecher C; Honl M; Morlock MM
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(5):1158-64. PubMed ID: 16806236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A novel real-time confocal imaging technique for examining host-implant interfacial shear failure patterns.
    Cook RJ; Thompson ID; Robinson PD; Watson TF
    J Microsc; 2006 Aug; 223(Pt 2):96-106. PubMed ID: 16911070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Friction moments of large metal-on-metal hip joint bearings and other modern designs.
    Bishop NE; Waldow F; Morlock MM
    Med Eng Phys; 2008 Oct; 30(8):1057-64. PubMed ID: 18291702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bone-implant interface shear modulus and ultimate stress in a transcortical rabbit model of open-pore Ti6Al4V implants.
    Müller M; Hennig FF; Hothorn T; Stangl R
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(11):2123-32. PubMed ID: 16085075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of compromised cortical bone on implant load distribution.
    Akça K; Fanuscu MI; Caputo AA
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Dec; 17(8):616-20. PubMed ID: 18798784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The dynamic natures of implant loading.
    Wang RF; Kang B; Lang LA; Razzoog ME
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.