These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16003963)

  • 1. Using an improved 1D boundary layer model with CFD for flux prediction in gas-sparged tubular membrane ultrafiltration.
    Smith R; Taha T; Cui ZF
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):69-76. PubMed ID: 16003963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pressure and flux profiles in bead-filled ultrafiltration/microfiltration hollow fiber membrane modules.
    Dai XP; Luo RG; Sirkar KK
    Biotechnol Prog; 2000; 16(6):1044-54. PubMed ID: 11101333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of flux enhancing polymer on the characteristics of sludge in membrane bioreactor process.
    Yoon SH; Collins JH; Musale D; Sundararajan S; Tsai SP; Hallsby GA; Kong JF; Koppes J; Cachia P
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):151-7. PubMed ID: 16003973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of mass retention of dissolved organic matter and membrane pore size on membrane fouling and flux decline.
    Lin CF; Yu-Chen Lin A; Sri Chandana P; Tsai CY
    Water Res; 2009 Feb; 43(2):389-94. PubMed ID: 19013630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Membrane gas transfer under conditions of creeping flow: modeling gas composition effects.
    Fang Y; Clapp LW; Hozalski RM; Novak PJ; Semmens MJ
    Water Res; 2004 May; 38(10):2489-98. PubMed ID: 15159152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of mass transfer characteristics in a tubular membrane using CFD modeling.
    Yang J; Vedantam S; Spanjers H; Nopens I; van Lier JB
    Water Res; 2012 Oct; 46(15):4705-12. PubMed ID: 22770967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Numerical simulation of bubble induced shear in membrane bioreactors: effects of mixed liquor rheology and membrane configuration.
    Liu X; Wang Y; Waite TD; Leslie G
    Water Res; 2015 May; 75():131-45. PubMed ID: 25768986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The relationship between critical flux and fibre movement induced by bubbling in a submerged hollow fibre system.
    Wicaksana F; Fan AG; Chen V
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):115-22. PubMed ID: 16003969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Experimental and CFD simulation studies of wall shear stress for different impeller configurations and MBR activated sludge.
    Ratkovich N; Chan CC; Bentzen TR; Rasmussen MR
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(11):2061-70. PubMed ID: 22592479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Membrane bioreactors for water reclamation.
    Tao G; Kekre K; Wei Z; Lee TC; Viswanath B; Seah H
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):431-40. PubMed ID: 16004005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fluid hydrodynamics in submerged and sidestream membrane bioreactors.
    Le-Clech P; Alvarez-Vazquez H; Jefferson B; Judd S
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(3):113-9. PubMed ID: 14518862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predicting membrane flux decline from complex mixtures using flow-field flow fractionation measurements and semi-empirical theory.
    Pellegrino J; Wright S; Ranvill J; Amy G
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):85-92. PubMed ID: 16003965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modelling of the extractive membrane bioreactor process based on natural fluorescence fingerprints and process operation history.
    Wolf G; Almeida JS; Reis MA; Crespo JG
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):51-8. PubMed ID: 16003961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. MBR/RO/ozone processes for TFT-LCD industrial wastewater treatment and recycling.
    Chen TK; Ni CH; Chan YC; Lu MC
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):411-9. PubMed ID: 16004003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Removal of cobalt ions from aqueous solutions by polymer assisted ultrafiltration using experimental design approach: part 2: Optimization of hydrodynamic conditions for a crossflow ultrafiltration module with rotating part.
    Cojocaru C; Zakrzewska-Trznadel G; Miskiewicz A
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Sep; 169(1-3):610-20. PubMed ID: 19414217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Integration of coliform decay within a CFD (computational fluid dynamic) model of a waste stabilisation pond.
    Shilton A; Harrison J
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 14510212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Complexity of ultrafiltration membrane fouling caused by macromolecular dissolved organic compounds in secondary effluents.
    Haberkamp J; Ernst M; Böckelmann U; Szewzyk U; Jekel M
    Water Res; 2008 Jun; 42(12):3153-61. PubMed ID: 18423516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Enzyme recovery during gas/liquid two-phase flow microfiltration of enzyme/yeast mixtures.
    Mercier-Bonin M; Fonade C
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2002 Dec; 80(6):610-21. PubMed ID: 12378602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of chemical cleaning and air-sparging on the critical and sustainable flux in a flat sheet membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment.
    Guglielmi G; Chiarani D; Saroj DP; Andreottola G
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(12):1873-9. PubMed ID: 18587173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prediction of permeate flux during osmotic pressure-controlled electric field-enhanced cross-flow ultrafiltration.
    Sarkar B; DasGupta S; De S
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 2008 Mar; 319(1):236-46. PubMed ID: 18068719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.