516 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16003970)
21. Fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes by dairy industry effluents.
Turan M; Ates A; Inanc B
Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(12):355-60. PubMed ID: 12201123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Treatment of dairy wastewater by two-stage membrane operation with ultrafiltration and nanofiltration.
Gong YW; Zhang HX; Cheng XN
Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(5):915-9. PubMed ID: 22339027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Foulant characterization of the NF membranes with and without pretreatment of biologically treated wastewater.
Shon HK; Vigneswaran S; Ngo HH; Kim IS; Ben Aim R
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):277-84. PubMed ID: 16003987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Biopolymer fouling in dead-end ultrafiltration of treated domestic wastewater.
Zheng X; Ernst M; Huck PM; Jekel M
Water Res; 2010 Oct; 44(18):5212-21. PubMed ID: 20637488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A hybridized photocatalysis-microfiltration system with iron oxide-coated membranes for the removal of natural organic matter in water treatment: effects of iron oxide layers and colloids.
Yao P; Choo KH; Kim MH
Water Res; 2009 Sep; 43(17):4238-48. PubMed ID: 19576613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Organic colloids and their influence on low-pressure membrane filtration.
Laabs C; Amy G; Jekel M
Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(12):311-6. PubMed ID: 15686036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Irreversible membrane fouling during ultrafiltration of surface water.
Kimura K; Hane Y; Watanabe Y; Amy G; Ohkuma N
Water Res; 2004; 38(14-15):3431-41. PubMed ID: 15276760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Influence of the size of membrane foulants on the filterability of WWTP-effluent.
Poele St; Roorda JH; van der Graaf JH
Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(12):111-8. PubMed ID: 15686010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effects of mass retention of dissolved organic matter and membrane pore size on membrane fouling and flux decline.
Lin CF; Yu-Chen Lin A; Sri Chandana P; Tsai CY
Water Res; 2009 Feb; 43(2):389-94. PubMed ID: 19013630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of humic acid rejection and flux decline during filtration with negatively charged and uncharged ultrafiltration membranes.
Shao J; Hou J; Song H
Water Res; 2011 Jan; 45(2):473-82. PubMed ID: 20863548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Removal of coliphages in secondary effluent by microfiltration-mechanisms of removal and impact of operating parameters.
Farahbakhsh K; Smith DW
Water Res; 2004 Feb; 38(3):585-92. PubMed ID: 14723927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Use of fouling resistant nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes for dyeing wastewater effluent treatment.
Myung SW; Choi IH; Lee SH; Kim IC; Lee KH
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):159-64. PubMed ID: 16003974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Investigation on effects of aggregate structure in water and wastewater treatment.
Chau KW
Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(12):119-24. PubMed ID: 15686011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Development of a novel Submerged Membrane Electro-Bioreactor (SMEBR): performance for fouling reduction.
Bani-Melhem K; Elektorowicz M
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 May; 44(9):3298-304. PubMed ID: 20355694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Fouling mitigation by iron-based electroflocculation in microfiltration: Mechanisms and energy minimization.
Ben Sasson M; Adin A
Water Res; 2010 Jul; 44(13):3973-81. PubMed ID: 20570312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Removal of humic acid foulant from ultrafiltration membrane surface using photocatalytic oxidation process.
Fang H; Sun DD; Wu M; Phay W; Tay JH
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):373-80. PubMed ID: 16003999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Impact of coagulation and adsorption on DOC fractions of secondary effluent and resulting fouling behaviour in ultrafiltration.
Haberkamp J; Ruhl AS; Ernst M; Jekel M
Water Res; 2007 Sep; 41(17):3794-802. PubMed ID: 17585987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effect of coagulation on fouling potential and removal of algal organic matter in ultrafiltration pretreatment to seawater reverse osmosis.
Alizadeh Tabatabai SA; Schippers JC; Kennedy MD
Water Res; 2014 Aug; 59():283-94. PubMed ID: 24810744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The fouling characterization and control in the high concentration PAC membrane bioreactor HCPAC-MBR.
Seo GT; Jang SW; Lee SH; Yoon CH
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):77-84. PubMed ID: 16003964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Achieving very low mercury levels in refinery wastewater by membrane filtration.
Urgun-Demirtas M; Benda PL; Gillenwater PS; Negri MC; Xiong H; Snyder SW
J Hazard Mater; 2012 May; 215-216():98-107. PubMed ID: 22410725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
