These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

323 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16003973)

  • 41. Effect of organic loading rate on a wastewater treatment process combining moving bed biofilm and membrane reactors.
    Melin E; Leiknes T; Helness H; Rasmussen V; Odegaard H
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):421-30. PubMed ID: 16004004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. MBR/RO/ozone processes for TFT-LCD industrial wastewater treatment and recycling.
    Chen TK; Ni CH; Chan YC; Lu MC
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):411-9. PubMed ID: 16004003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The fouling characterization and control in the high concentration PAC membrane bioreactor HCPAC-MBR.
    Seo GT; Jang SW; Lee SH; Yoon CH
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):77-84. PubMed ID: 16003964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Relation between EPS adherence, viscoelastic properties, and MBR operation: Biofouling study with QCM-D.
    Sweity A; Ying W; Ali-Shtayeh MS; Yang F; Bick A; Oron G; Herzberg M
    Water Res; 2011 Dec; 45(19):6430-40. PubMed ID: 22014563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Modeling prediction of membrane bioreactor process with the concept of soluble microbial product.
    Lu SG; Imai T; Ukita M; Sekine M; Higuchi T
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(11-12):63-9. PubMed ID: 12523734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Long-term operation of submerged membrane bioreactor (MBR) for the treatment of synthetic wastewater containing styrene as volatile organic compound (VOC): Effect of hydraulic retention time (HRT).
    Fallah N; Bonakdarpour B; Nasernejad B; Alavi Moghadam MR
    J Hazard Mater; 2010 Jun; 178(1-3):718-24. PubMed ID: 20207478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Membranebioreactor with external membranes.
    Jonkers C; Carrette R; De Lathouwer J; Thoeye C
    Meded Rijksuniv Gent Fak Landbouwkd Toegep Biol Wet; 2001; 66(3a):87-93. PubMed ID: 15954567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Treatment of domestic sewage by a metal membrane bioreactor.
    Xie YH; Zhu T; Xu CH; Nozaki T; Furukawa K
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(6):1102-8. PubMed ID: 22378009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Peak flux performance and microbial removal by selected membrane bioreactor systems.
    Hirani ZM; DeCarolis JF; Adham SS; Jacangelo JG
    Water Res; 2010 Apr; 44(8):2431-40. PubMed ID: 20144839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Performances of a hybrid adsorption/submerged membrane biological process for toxic waste removal.
    Lesage N; Spérandio M; Cabassud C
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):173-80. PubMed ID: 16003976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Calibrating a side-stream membrane bioreactor using Activated Sludge Model No. 1.
    Jiang T; Liu X; Kennedy MD; Schippers JC; Vanrolleghem PA
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(10-11):359-67. PubMed ID: 16459810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Process efficiency and microbial monitoring in MBR (membrane bioreactor) and CASP (conventional activated sludge process) treatment of tannery wastewater.
    Munz G; Gualtiero M; Salvadori L; Claudia B; Claudio L
    Bioresour Technol; 2008 Dec; 99(18):8559-64. PubMed ID: 18499451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Proposing a method for online permeability monitoring in membrane bioreactors.
    Joss A; Böhler M; Wedi D; Siegrist H
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(2):497-506. PubMed ID: 19633393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Influence of filtration conditions on membrane fouling and scouring aeration effectiveness in submerged membrane bioreactors to treat municipal wastewater.
    Nywening JP; Zhou H
    Water Res; 2009 Aug; 43(14):3548-58. PubMed ID: 19501871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Characteristics of aerobic granular sludge membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment].
    Zhu ZZ; Zhou Y; Li XF; Chen J
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2006 Jan; 27(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 16599121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Fate and distribution of pharmaceuticals in wastewater and sewage sludge of the conventional activated sludge (CAS) and advanced membrane bioreactor (MBR) treatment.
    Radjenović J; Petrović M; Barceló D
    Water Res; 2009 Feb; 43(3):831-41. PubMed ID: 19091371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Impact of chemical cleaning and air-sparging on the critical and sustainable flux in a flat sheet membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment.
    Guglielmi G; Chiarani D; Saroj DP; Andreottola G
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(12):1873-9. PubMed ID: 18587173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Use of fouling resistant nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes for dyeing wastewater effluent treatment.
    Myung SW; Choi IH; Lee SH; Kim IC; Lee KH
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):159-64. PubMed ID: 16003974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Application of membrane bioreactor system with full scale plant on livestock wastewater.
    Kim H; Kim HS; Yeom IT; Chae YB
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):465-71. PubMed ID: 16004009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Simultaneous nitrogen and phosphor removal in an aerobic submerged membrane bioreactor.
    Wang ZW; Wu ZC; Gu GW; Yu GP; Ma LM
    J Environ Sci (China); 2006; 18(3):439-45. PubMed ID: 17294637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.