463 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16003976)
21. Domestic wastewater reclamation by submerged membrane bioreactor with high concentration powdered activated carbon for stream restoration.
Seo GT; Ahan HI; Kim JT; Lee YJ; Kim IS
Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 15344788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Modelling the degradation of low concentration pollutants in membrane bioreactors.
Peev M; Schönerklee M; De Wever H
Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(5):209-18. PubMed ID: 15497850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effect of PAC dosage in a pilot-scale PAC-MBR treating micro-polluted surface water.
Hu J; Shang R; Deng H; Heijman SG; Rietveld LC
Bioresour Technol; 2014 Feb; 154():290-6. PubMed ID: 24412856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Ozonation effect on natural organic matter adsorption and biodegradation--application to a membrane bioreactor containing activated carbon for drinking water production.
Treguer R; Tatin R; Couvert A; Wolbert D; Tazi-Pain A
Water Res; 2010 Feb; 44(3):781-8. PubMed ID: 19906398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Influence of diatomite addition on membrane fouling and performance in a submerged membrane bioreactor.
Yang XL; Song HL; Lu JL; Fu DF; Cheng B
Bioresour Technol; 2010 Dec; 101(23):9178-84. PubMed ID: 20685114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of biological activated carbon (BAC) and membrane bioreactor (MBR) for pollutants removal in drinking water treatment.
Tian JY; Chen ZL; Liang H; Li X; Wang ZZ; Li GB
Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(6):1515-23. PubMed ID: 19759454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Influence of suspension viscosity and colloidal particles on permeability of membrane used in membrane bioreactor (MBR).
Itonaga T; Kimura K; Watanabe Y
Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(12):301-9. PubMed ID: 15686035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Change in the fouling propensity of sludge in membrane bioreactors (MBR) in relation to the accumulation of biopolymer clusters.
Sun FY; Wang XM; Li XY
Bioresour Technol; 2011 Apr; 102(7):4718-25. PubMed ID: 21316942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison between sequential and simultaneous application of activated carbon with membrane bioreactor for trace organic contaminant removal.
Nguyen LN; Hai FI; Kang J; Nghiem LD; Price WE; Guo W; Ngo HH; Tung KL
Bioresour Technol; 2013 Feb; 130():412-7. PubMed ID: 23313687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effect of powdered activated carbon (PAC) and cationic polymer on biofouling mitigation in hybrid MBRs.
Jamal Khan S; Visvanathan C; Jegatheesan V
Bioresour Technol; 2012 Jun; 113():165-8. PubMed ID: 22264429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Rapid adsorption pretreatment with submicrometre powdered activated carbon particles before microfiltration.
Matsui Y; Murase R; Sanogawa T; Aoki N; Mima S; Inoue T; Matsushita T
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):249-56. PubMed ID: 16003984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effect of mixed liquor pH on the removal of trace organic contaminants in a membrane bioreactor.
Tadkaew N; Sivakumar M; Khan SJ; McDonald JA; Nghiem LD
Bioresour Technol; 2010 Mar; 101(5):1494-500. PubMed ID: 19864128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of sulfonated and other micropollutants removal in membrane bioreactor and conventional wastewater treatment.
De Wever H; Weiss S; Reemtsma T; Vereecken J; Müller J; Knepper T; Rörden O; Gonzalez S; Barcelo D; Dolores Hernando M
Water Res; 2007 Feb; 41(4):935-45. PubMed ID: 17207834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Membranebioreactor with external membranes.
Jonkers C; Carrette R; De Lathouwer J; Thoeye C
Meded Rijksuniv Gent Fak Landbouwkd Toegep Biol Wet; 2001; 66(3a):87-93. PubMed ID: 15954567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Membrane bioreactors for water reclamation.
Tao G; Kekre K; Wei Z; Lee TC; Viswanath B; Seah H
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):431-40. PubMed ID: 16004005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Studies on the effect of humic acids and phenol on adsorption-ultrafiltration process performance.
Mozia S; Tomaszewska M; Morawski AW
Water Res; 2005; 39(2-3):501-9. PubMed ID: 15644259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Biomass characteristics of two types of submerged membrane bioreactors for nitrogen removal from wastewater.
Liang Z; Das A; Beerman D; Hu Z
Water Res; 2010 Jun; 44(11):3313-20. PubMed ID: 20371094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Microbial adaptation to biodegrade toxic organic micro-pollutants in membrane bioreactor using different sludge sources.
Boonnorat J; Chiemchaisri C; Chiemchaisri W; Yamamoto K
Bioresour Technol; 2014 Aug; 165():50-9. PubMed ID: 24791712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Membranes coupled with physico chemical treatment in water reuse.
Guo WS; Zhang R; Vigneswaran S; Ngo HH; Kandasamy J
Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(2):513-9. PubMed ID: 20107279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of two treatments for the removal of selected organic micropollutants and bulk organic matter: conventional activated sludge followed by ultrafiltration versus membrane bioreactor.
Sahar E; Ernst M; Godehardt M; Hein A; Herr J; Kazner C; Melin T; Cikurel H; Aharoni A; Messalem R; Brenner A; Jekel M
Water Sci Technol; 2011; 63(4):733-40. PubMed ID: 21330721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
